The Saudi Fuhrer of Saudi based islamofascist OIC

Theresa May is for sharia and EU - but against EU's Human Rights Court which condemns sharia

Sayeeda Warsi like all sharia muslims is against basic Human Rights

If you don't agree on the most basic Human Rights, then you're a racist/sexist hater

Klevius is probably now the world's foremost expert on sex segregation (sad isn't it), and islam (the worst cime ever) is the foremost expression of sex segregation. By 'islam' Klevius means the same as true sharia supporting (and therefore against the most basic of Human Rights) muslims.

British muslim jihadists: Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo (who murdered Le

Wednesday, November 30, 2016

Should BBC be prosecuted as an accomplice to Saudi terrorism and war crimes: Disgusting BBC doesn't even mention the human suffering in Mosul but continues its extremely biased "reporting" about Syria.


Islam is a tool for evil*. The sooner you get it the sooner Human Rights equality can reach and release islam's suffering victims!

* It's an open secret that islam will loose its racist/sexist attraction in the very moment it conforms with basic Human Rights equality.

Peter Klevius question: How can BBC staff and politicians sleep at night - well knowing they are lying about Syria and the suffering they themselves are accomplices to?


Syria war would stop in the very moment West stops supporting the Saudi dictator family. However, BBC and some politicians continue the Saudi evil - and accuse Syria and Russia for what in reality is almost entirely up to the Saudi "ally".


The current CIA director John Brennan, who joined the CIA in 1980 and was a station chief in Saudi Arabia and the chief of the national counterterrorism center, thinks Mohammad bin Salman is a nice guy:


Mohammad bin Salman did not go abroad to university, choosing to remain in Riyadh where he attended King Saud University, graduating in sharia "law". Associates said he neither smoked nor drank and had no interest in partying.

BND, the German intelligence agency, portrayed Saudi defense minister and Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, as a political gambler who is destabilizing the Arab world through proxy wars in Yemen and Syria.

On 24 September 2015, 2,236 Hajj pilgrimage attendees were killed by an event now called the Mina Stampede, which sources claim was due to attempts by the personal convoy of Mohammed bin Salman to force itself through the crowd, and due to several road closures in the area.

Here's an other close friend of John Brennan


 and here's what he's doing


Paul Sperry, author of “Infiltration: How Muslim Spies and Subversives Have Penetrated Washington.”: Counterterrorism experts have long suspected Saudi Arabia’s “rehabilitation” center for terrorists does a poor job of de-radicalizing jihadists. But a Saudi detainee at Guantanamo Bay now reveals it’s actually a recruiting and training factory for jihad.

According to recently declassified documents, senior al Qaeda operative Ghassan Abdullah al-Sharbi told a Gitmo parole board that the Saudi government has been encouraging previously released prisoners to rejoin the jihad at its terrorist reform school, officially known as the Prince Mohammed bin Naif Counseling and Care Center.

The Obama administration has praised the effectiveness of the Saudi rehab program — which uses “art therapy,” swimming, ping-pong, PlayStation and soccer to de-radicalize terrorists — and conditioned the release of dozens of Gitmo prisoners, including former Osama bin Laden bodyguards, on their enrollment in the controversial program.

To date, 134 Saudi detainees have been transferred to the Saudi reform camps in Riyadh and Jeddah. Last year, nine Yemeni detainees were sent there, as well, and more are expected to follow over the next two months, as President Obama strives to meet his campaign goal of closing Gitmo.

Al-Sharbi dropped a bombshell on the Gitmo parole board at his hearing earlier this year when he informed members that the Saudi kingdom was playing them for suckers. “You guys want to send me back to Saudi Arabia because you believe there is a de-radicalization program on the surface.

“True. You are 100 percent right, there is a strong — externally, a strong — de-radicalization program. But make no mistake, underneath there is a hidden radicalization program,” al-Sharbi added. “There is a very hidden strong — way stronger in magnitude — broader in financing, in all that.”

Al-Sharbi is one of the longest-serving, and most unrepentant, prisoners at Gitmo. A Saudi national with an electrical engineering degree from King Fahd University, he attended a US flight school associated with two of the 9/11 hijackers. He traveled to Afghanistan in the summer of 2001 and trained at an al Qaeda camp, building IEDs to use against allied forces.

Al-Sharbi was captured March 28, 2002, at an al Qaeda safehouse in Faisalabad, Pakistan, with senior al Qaeda leader Abu Zubaydah. According to his US intel dossier, he told interrogators that “the US got what it deserved from the terrorist attacks on 9/11.”

Given a chance at parole after 14 years, however, al-Sharbi was surprisingly frank with the board.

He explained that Riyadh is actively recruiting and training fighters to battle Iranian elements in neighboring Yemen and Syria. Saudi views Shiite-controlled Iran as a regional threat to its security.

“They’re launching more wars and the [United] States is backing off from the region,” he said. “They’re poking their nose here and here and there and they’re recruiting more jihadists, and they’ll tell you, ‘Okay, go fight in Yemen. Go fight in Syria.’ ”

Al-Sharbi said the Saudis also are “encouraging” former detainees “to fight their jihad in the States.”

“It’s not like a past history,” he said. “It’s increasing.”

A growing body of evidence backs up his claims. Last month, for example, a WikiLeaked email from Hillary Clinton revealed, citing US intelligence sources, that Saudi Arabia has provided “clandestine financial and logistic support to” ISIS and other Sunni terrorist groups in the region.

Al-Sharbi said the kingdom is playing a double game.

“They will proudly tell you they will fight terrorism,” he said. “That means they will support it.”

Al-Sharbi told the Gitmo board he doesn’t want to enroll in the Saudi rehab program, because he would be used to “fight under the Saudi royal cloak.”

“This is in the cause of a king. This is not a true jihad,” he said. “And I’m not going to Saudi unless I am sure they’re not gonna be using me.”

The Saudi rehab ruse has carried a lot of weight with the Gitmo parole board. Earlier this year, it released “Saudi al Qaeda recruiter and fighter” Muhammed Al Shumrani after his lawyers insisted that repatriating him to Saudi Arabia and enrolling him in its “well-established reintegration program” would cure his admittedly “problematic behavior.”

Last year, the defense team of longtime bin Laden bodyguard Abdul Rahman Shalabi insisted that the same Saudi rehab program would make sure he’s reformed. In approving his release, the board said that it was “confident about the efficacy of the Saudi program.”

In both cases, US intelligence warned the board that the hardened terrorists would more than likely “re-engage in terrorist activity.”

By Riyadh’s own numbers, some 20 percent of the terrorist enrollees at its rehab club — which features golf carts, palm trees and an Olympic-size pool — go back to the jihad, returning to the ranks of the Taliban or al Qaeda. US officials believe the recidivism rate is much higher, but Saudi Arabia does not disclose criteria for evaluation.

One high-profile failure was Said Ali al-Shihri. After his graduation from the Saudi program, he returned to Yemen, where he ran an al Qaeda branch and helped plan the deadly bombing of the US Embassy and mastermind the failed plot to blow up a 2009 Christmas flight over Detroit, before a drone-fired missile finally caught up to him.

The Saudi center is more holiday resort than halfway house for paroled inmates. Jihadists are rewarded with gourmet meals, video games, ping-pong, jacuzzis and newly furnished private apartments reserved for conjugal visits. They also are allowed unescorted visits to family members. In September, the center granted “beneficiaries” Eid al-Adha holiday vacation for 12 days.

Graduates are further rewarded with young brides and new cars.

Lending credence to al-Sharbi’s charges, the three-month program includes a few hours a day of lessons in Islam from Saudi clerics and “Shariah specialists.”

“Beneficiaries spend 15 hours a week in the Shariah program,” according to a local Jeddah press report, which is triple the amount of time devoted to psychological counseling.

Al-Sharbi’s parole was declined; he is still in Gitmo, along with 60 detainees — down from the 241 who were there when Obama started his term.

But with the administration rushing to reduce that number even further before the end of Obama’s term, how many more jihadists will be released into this highly suspect program?

Congress has an obligation to ask hard questions: Is this a pre-emptive campaign to prevent terror attacks or more likely an incubator for facilitating more attacks?



The CIA’s director John Brennan told Al Arabiya News Channel that “there was no evidence” of a Saudi involvement in the 9/11 attacks.

However, there are 29 pages, not 28, numbered 415 through 443 in the congressional inquiry into the 9/11 attacks. And deletions on the pages — sometimes words, often whole lines — add up to the equivalent of a total of three pages. So we still are not being given the full story.

It is instantly apparent that the widely held belief for why the pages were not initially released — to prevent embarrassing the Saudi royal family — is true.

The pages are devastating:

Page 415: “While in the United States, some of the September 11 hijackers were in contact with, and received support and assistance from, individuals who may be connected to the Saudi Government.… [A]t least two of those individuals were alleged by some to be Saudi intelligence officers.”

Page 417: One of the individuals identified in the pages as a financial supporter of two of the 9/11 hijackers, Osama Bassnan, later received a “significant amount of cash” from “a member of the Saudi Royal Family”during a 2002 trip to Houston.

Page 418: “Another Saudi national with close ties to the Saudi Royal Family, [deleted], is the subject of FBI counterterrorism investigations.”

Pages 418 and 419: Detained al Qaeda leader Abu Zubaida had in his phone book the unlisted number for the security company that managed the Colorado residence of the then-Saudi ambassador to the United States, Prince Bandar bin Sultan.

Page 421: “a [deleted], dated July 2, 2002, [indicates] ‘incontrovertible evidence that there is support for these terrorists inside the Saudi Government.’”

Page 426: Bassnan’s wife was receiving money “from Princess Haifa Bint Sultan,” the wife of the Saudi ambassador. (Her correct name is actually Princess Haifa bint Faisal.)

Page 436: The general counsel of the US Treasury Department, David Aufhauser, testified that “offices [of the Saudi charity al-Haramain] have significant contacts with extremists, Islamic extremists.” CIA officials also testified “that they were making progress on their investigations of al-Haramain.… [T]he head of the central office is complicit in supporting terrorism, and it also raised questions about [then-Saudi Interior Minister] Prince Nayef.”


And here's the Saudi dictator family's "peaceful" branch.

Saudi based and steered OIC is all Sunni muslims Umma organization, which has declared the most basic Human Rights obsolete if they aren't sharia compliant.



WikiLeaks:

               
Congrats!

               

                    From:john.podesta@gmail.com
                    To: hrod17@clintonemail.com
                    Date: 2014-09-27 15:15
                    Subject: Congrats!
                   
               


           

               

                    Send our love to Chelsea,  Marc and Grandpa. Can't wait to meet Charlotte.
 On Aug 19, 2014 9:22 AM, "H" wrote:

 Agree but there may be opportunities as the Iraqi piece improves.

Also, any idea whose fighters attacked Islamist positions in Tripoli, Libya?
Worth analyzing for future purposes.

 *From*: John Podesta [mailto:john.podesta@gmail.com]
*Sent*: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 09:19 AM
*To*: H
*Subject*: Re: Here's what I mentioned

Hit send too soon. Meant to say Syria elements are vexing.
On Aug 19, 2014 9:17 AM, "John Podesta" wrote:

> I think we are headed down this path in Iraq, but the Syria elements are
> On Aug 17, 2014 3:50 PM, "H" wrote:
>
>> Note: Sources include Western intelligence, US intelligence and sources
>> in the region.
>>
>>
>>
>>             1. With all of its tragic aspects, the advance of ISIL
>> through Iraq gives the U.S. Government an opportunity to change the way it
>> deals with the chaotic security situation in North Africa and the Middle
>> East.  The most important factor in this matter is to make use of
>> intelligence resources and Special Operations troops in an aggressive
>> manner, while avoiding the old school solution, which calls for more
>> traditional military operations.  In Iraq it is important that we engage
>> ISIL using the resources of the Peshmerga fighters of the Kurdish Regional
>> Government (KRG), and what, if any, reliable units exist in the Iraqi
>> Army.  The Peshmerga commanders are aggressive hard fighting troops, who
>> have long standing relationships with CIA officers and Special Forces
>> operators.  However, they will need the continued commitment of U.S.
>> personnel to work with them as advisors and strategic planners, the new
>> generation of Peshmerga commanders being largely untested in traditional
>> combat.  That said, with this U.S. aid the Kurdish troops can inflict a
>> real defeat on ISIL.
>>
>>
>>
>>             2.  It is important that once we engage ISIL, as we have now
>> done in a limited manner, we and our allies should carry on until they are
>> driven back suffering a tangible defeat.  Anything short of this will be
>> seen by other fighters in the region, Libya, Lebanon, and even Jordan, as
>> an American defeat. However, if we provide advisors and planners, as well
>> as increased close air support for the Peshmerga, these soldiers can defeat
>> ISIL.  They will give the new Iraqi Government a chance to organize itself,
>> and restructure the Sunni resistance in Syria, moving the center of power
>> toward moderate forces like the Free Syrian Army (FSA).  In addition to air
>> support, the Peshmerga also need artillery and armored vehicles to deal
>> with the tanks and other heavy equipment captured from the Iraqi army by
>> ISIL.
>>
>>
>>
>> 3.  In the past the USG, in an agreement with the Turkish General Staff,
>> did not provide such heavy weapons to the Peshmerga, out of a concern that
>> they would end up in the hands of Kurdish rebels inside of Turkey.  The
>> current situation in Iraq, not to mention the political environment in
>> Turkey, makes this policy obsolete.  Also this equipment can now be
>> airlifted directly into the KRG zone.
>>
>>
>>
>> 4.  Armed with proper equipment, and working with U.S. advisors, the
>> Peshmerga can attack the ISIL with a coordinated assault supported from the
>> air.  This effort will come as a surprise to the ISIL, whose leaders
>> believe we will always stop with targeted bombing, and weaken them both in
>> Iraq and inside of Syria.  At the same time we should return to plans to
>> provide the FSA, or some group of moderate forces, with equipment that will
>> allow them to deal with a weakened ISIL, and stepped up operations against
>> the Syrian regime.  This entire effort should be done with a low profile,
>> avoiding the massive traditional military operations that are at best
>> temporary solutions.  While this military/para-military operation is moving
>> forward, we need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence
>> assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia,
>> which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL and
>> other radical Sunni groups in the region.  This effort will be enhanced by
>> the stepped up commitment in the KRG.  The Qataris and Saudis will be put
>> in a position of balancing policy between their ongoing competition to
>> dominate the Sunni world and the consequences of serious U.S. pressure.  By
>> the same token, the threat of similar, realistic U.S. operations will serve
>> to assist moderate forces in Libya, Lebanon, and even Jordan, where
>> insurgents are increasingly fascinated by the ISIL success in Iraq.
>>
>>
>>
>> 6.  In the end the situation in Iraq is merely the latest and most
>> dangerous example of the regional restructuring that is taking place across
>> North Africa, all the way to the Turkish border.  These developments are
>> important to the U.S. for reasons that often differ from country to
>> country: energy and moral commitment to Iraq, energy issues in Libya, and
>> strategic commitments in Jordan.  At the same time, as Turkey moves toward
>> a new, more serious Islamic reality, it will be important for them to
>> realize that we are willing to take serious actions, which can be sustained
>> to protect our national interests.  This course of action offers the
>> potential for success, as opposed to large scale, traditional military
>> campaigns, that are too expensive and awkward to maintain over time.
>>
>>
>>
>> 7.  (Note: A source in Tripoli stated in confidence that when the U.S.
>> Embassy was evacuated, the presence of two U.S. Navy jet fighters over the
>> city brought all fighting to a halt for several hours, as Islamist forces
>> were not certain that these aircraft would not also provide close ground
>> support for moderate government forces.)
>>
>>
>>
>>             8.  If we do not take the changes needed to make our security
>> policy in the region more realistic, there is a real danger of ISIL
>> veterans moving on to other countries to facilitate operations by Islamist
>> forces.  This is already happening in Libya and Egypt, where fighters are
>> returning from Syria to work with local forces. ISIL is only the latest and
>> most violent example of this process.  If we don’t act to defeat them in
>> Iraq something even more violent and dangerous will develop.  Successful
>> military operations against these very irregular but determined forces can
>> only be accomplished by making proper use of clandestine/special operations
>> resources, in coordination with airpower, and established local allies.
>> There is, unfortunately, a narrow window of opportunity on this issue, as
>> we need to act before an ISIL state becomes better organized and reaches
>> into Lebanon and Jordan.
>>
>>
>>
>>             9. (Note: It is important to keep in mind that as a result of
>> this policy there probably will be concern in the Sunni regions of Iraq and
>> the Central Government regarding the possible expansion of KRG controlled
>> territory.  With advisors in the Peshmerga command we can reassure the
>> concerned parties that, in return for increase autonomy, the KRG will not
>> exclude the Iraqi Government from participation in the management of the
>> oil fields around Kirkuk, and the Mosel Dam hydroelectric facility.  At the
>> same time we will be able to work with the Peshmerga as they pursue ISIL
>> into disputed areas of Eastern Syria, coordinating with FSA troops who can
>> move against ISIL from the North.  This will make certain Basher al Assad
>> does not gain an advantage from these operations.  Finally, as it now
>> appears the U.S. is considering a plan to offer contractors as advisors to
>> the Iraqi Ministry of Defense, we will be in a position to coordinate more
>> effectively between the Peshmerga and the Iraqi Army.)

Wednesday, November 23, 2016

BBC Today says "heil" - to protect sharia islamofascism


Why is BBC so deliberately painting a picture of Trump as a Nazi when he's as far you can get from it*, while doing the opposite with islamofascist sharia muslims?

* Trump has, for example, never said women should be sex segregated by law - sharia muslims do.

BBC Today with Nick Robinson and John Humphreys: What's the difference between white nationalists whom Trump condemns and disavows of, and the "alt-right" that supports him?

Klevius: What a weird question, keeping in mind that BBC started the report with a soundbite of some fringe American nationalists shouting "Heil Trump" (compare a similar situation with black supremacists heiling Obama and Nation of Islam).

BBC's cherry picked guest ("expert on white supremacism") then worried that although Breitbart News and Bannon etc. condemn and disavow of racism, anti-semitism etc. - but are critical of islam - don't distinguish between racist nationalists and the alt-right movement.



Klevius: Well, isn't that what BBC does all the time with islam and sharia islamofascism? The only exception being when muslims use bombs, knives etc. against the "wrong" target. Otherwise whatever Human Rights violating sharia muslim is just considered a muslim in general committed to islam in general.

Immediately after this hateful and deliberately divisive "news report", as it happened, BBC started talking about Nazi Germany and Anne Frank - all in an effort to paint a picture for its listeners (especially the ignorant ones - and younger people already well brainwashed about "the great religion of islam" at school, by BBC etc.) that Trump somehow could be connected to Hitler and German Nationalsocialism (aka Nazism).


Tuesday, November 22, 2016

Obama is a tight accomplice with the Saudi dictator family's wars on its neighbors - as is BBC


How long will Obama's "race-tan" protect his appalling bigotry and hypocrisy from a more general scrutiny*?

* Klevius is quite sure he has made a deal with Trump about criminal Hillary Clinton. However, has he also protected his own retirement? Probably.


An an alternative view to that of Obama, NYT, BBC etc.

Stephen Lendman: US-supported terrorists control eastern Aleppo public and private hospitals still functioning – using them for military purposes, denying vital treatment for residents in need.

Syrian and forces began a large-scale offensive to liberate Aleppo entirely from the scourge of US-backed terrorism.

On October 18, Russian and Syrian aerial operations were halted within a 10 km area in terrorist-controlled eastern parts of the city – conducting them in surrounding areas alone so far, aimed at cutting supply lines and aiding the advance of government-led forces.

At the same time, Russian and Syrian aerial operations are ongoing in Idlib and Homs provinces, along with other areas infested with US-backed terrorists.

In times of war, media scoundrels are virtual Pentagon and administration press agents, notably The New York Times, America’s leading propaganda disseminator.

It’s latest misinformation claims “intensifying bombardment…forced (eastern Aleppo hospitals) to stop providing care,” citing a World Health Organization report lacking credibility.

For months, area hospitals controlled by US-supported terrorists virtually halted treatment for injured and ill residents, using the facilities entirely for themselves.

NYT:

    “(T)he Syrian government has resolved to press forward regardless of the humanitarian cost, and to gamble that Western countries, particularly the United States, will not stop them.”

    “President Obama has never been keen on military action in Syria, and the incoming American president, Donald J. Trump, is more sympathetic to Russia, which has allied with the Syrian government.”

Fact: Syrian and allied forces launched a large-scale offensive to liberate eastern Aleppo from US-backed terrorists controlling it – an operation deserving universal support.

Fact: Syria is Obama’s war, naked aggression against a sovereign independent nation threatening no one, using ISIS, al-Nusra and other terrorist groups as imperial foot soldiers. So-called “moderate rebels” are misnamed. None exist. All anti-government forces are foreign-supported cutthroat killers.

Terrorists continue massacring defenseless civilians in eastern and western parts of the city, including women and children. The Times and other media scoundrels ignore their war crimes – blaming Syria and Russia irresponsibly.

Throughout years of endless war and fruitless Russian diplomatic efforts for resolution, media scoundrels continue misreporting what’s ongoing.

In all US war theaters, they’re imperial agents and facilitators, abdicating their responsibility as journalists – serving as advocates for Washington’s geopolitical agenda.



Klevius: BBC is no less contributing to the suffering ultimately caused by the US and UK "close ally", the islamofascist Saudi dictator family who has been masterminding and supporting most of the islamic* atrocities around the world through deliberate islamic hate mongering.

* BBC recently explained for its listeners that although islamofascism is 'islamic' it has nothing to do with islam.
When "Emergency Relief Co-ordinator" Stephen O'Brien today was interviewed by BBC Radio 4, the al-Nusra/al-Qaeda/IS terrorists bombardment of western Aleppo wasn't even mentioned. Only Russia and Syria itself were supposed to be the root of the evil.

Klevius question to you dear reader: What could possibly be more disgusting than using the suffering of a deliberate proxy war as a means to "prove" the "need" for prolonging more of the same?

How can the BBC's reporters face themselves in the morning mirror?

Monday, November 21, 2016

BBC uses a week's news to describe in detail a murder committed by a white mentally ill white Brit, as well as what "right wing" stuff he had in his home and on his search history - while presenting the death of an IS terrorist in an emotional interview with his muslim mother.


Ruthless BBC abuses the Cox/Mair tragedy to cover up the problem of sharia islamofascism


Thomas Mair, who is being held in connection with the death of MP Jo Cox had a long history of mental illness and sought help for his mental health problems the very night before she was killed - but was told to make an appointment and come back the next day.

However, BBC today didn't even mention his mental illness but instead used every news hour for a lengthy description of the murder and about his confused materials at home.

This is the very same BBC that has as its policy to quickly tone down (or rather not report at all if possible) atrocities committed by healthy but islam indoctrinated muslims.


Klevius wrote:

Saturday, September 5, 2015

Klevius proposes: Give a visa to civilization to every muslim who abandons Human Rights violating sharia islam!


How many in this muslim invasion are sharia muslims?




The Saudi dictator family is the by far worst single cause to islamic evil in Mideast and elsewhere today. And because they own both media and politicians, average people are still equally ignorant about islam as were the two UK girls visiting Zanzibar. Here's from Klevius blog 2013:


Klevius: Yes, it's perfectly normal. What a pity no one has told you before. Islam is the very essence of ultimate racism! This is why muslims are so sensitive about criticism against islam while showing extreme contempt and insensitivity against others. And this is also why OIC (all muslims world organization) not only have abandoned and even criminalized Human Rights (via UN) but also made it a crime to criticize islam (the worst ideological crime history knows about).

Later these girls were attacked by, most probably the muslim sons, who threw acid in their face.

We need more "islamophobia" and less sharia muslims. Politicians like Jeremy Corbyn, however, do the opposite and thereby cause even more suffering among islam's victims.

.
 Muslim countries without oil or aid







If islam is squeezed to fit the most basic of Human Rights - i.e. abandoning Human Rights violating sharia - then that would mean the definitive cure against Klevius "islamophobia". 

This is how it looks like in UK where Labour seems to be most pro-islamofascism.

We need more "islamophobia" to protect our children - not criminalize it as Jeremy Corbyn (and the Saudi dictator family) wants!



 Raed Salah: Very soon, Muhammad will be the most popular name in Europe.

Klevius: Question is, will most of those Muhammads have dropped that name when realizing the difference between Human Rights and evil Muhammad islam?

 Yes, Christians suffer under islam - but what about non-Christians?



Daniel Greenfield: There are Christian and non-Muslim minorities who are genuine refugees, but the two Muslim sects whose militias are murdering each other are not victims, they are perpetrators. Just because Sunnis are running from a Shiite militia or Shiites from a Sunni militia right now doesn’t make them victims.

The moment that their side’s militia wins and begins slaughtering the other side, the oppressed will become the oppressors. Such shifts have already taken place countless times in this conflict.

The refugees aren’t fleeing a dictator. They’re fleeing each other while carrying the hateful ideologies that caused this bloodshed with them.

 The head of a UNHCR camp called Syrian refugees "The most difficult refugees I've ever seen. In Bulgaria, they complained that there were no jobs. In Sweden, they took off their clothes to protest that it was too cold.

In Italy, Muslim African “refugees” rejected pasta and demanded food from their own countries. But the cruel Europeans who “mistreat” migrants set up a kitchen in Calais with imported spices cooked by a Michelin chef determined to give them the stir-fried rabbit and lamb meatballs they’re used to. There are also mobile phone charging stations so the destitute refugees can check on their Facebook accounts.

It had to be done because the refugees in Italy were throwing rocks at police while demanding free wifi.

This is the tawdry sense of entitlement of the Syrian Muslim refugee that the media champions.

Hussein said: "We have the feeling that the aid workers are heartless." (He) lives in a trailer that cost $3,000. The air-conditioner runs with electricity he is tapping from the Italian hospital. The water for his tea is from canisters provided by UNICEF. He hasn't worked, paid or thanked anyone for any of it.”

And why would he? He’s entitled to it by virtue of his superiority as a Muslim and our inferiority as infidels. There is no sense of gratitude. Only constant demands as if the people who drove out their own Christians and Jews have some moral claim on the charity of the Christians and Jews of the West.

The media howls that the Syrian refugee crisis is our fault. That is a lie.

What is happening in Syria is a religious civil war fought over the same ideologies as the ones practiced by the vast majority of the refugees. This is an Islamic war fought to determine which branch of Islam will be supreme. It is not a war that started last week or last year, but 1,400 years ago.

Klevius to non-sharia "muslims": Please, help Klevius (and yourself) by challenging stupid Western politicians and media!

Because of Arabic language imperialism (Allah talked Arabic only) Sunni islamofascism is much bigger and more dangerous than Shia. And the heart of not only Sunni islam but islam itself is in the hands of the Saudi dictator family which protects itself with the bodies of the victims it has itself created.

Klevius wrote:

Friday, April 27, 2012


Why isn't Alwaleed bin Talal arrested?! And why isn't OIC/Sharia criminalized just like Nazism etc fascist political ideologies?

Crimes against humanity and violation of the most basic Human Rights in the name of islamofascist Sharia. Rape or accomplice to rape, perverting the course of justice, media and finance manipulation etc etc. Possibilities for indictment may be some or all of these - or maybe more. It may be reasonable to assume that the actions of this scumbag has caused a lot more harm than Rupert Murdoch ever has (you know, the Brit whom BBC has chased for more than a year by now ' that very BBC whose commercial Mideast section functions as a channel for Sunni islam propaganda).

This rape accused Saudi islamofascist*, Alwaleed bin Talal, censors what you learn in schools and universities and in most news channels.

Here kissing/hugging Sudan's "president" Bashir who is arrested (although not produced as yet) by ICC. 

 * Definition of islamofascism: The deliberate neglect of the most basic Human Rights. And don't let them lure you by calling islamofascist Sharia "islamic human rights"!
!
Klevius question:  Why is the female person (sex slave under Sharia rapetivism?)  looking down? And what does she see? The origin of islam?!






















According to rumors members of European royalty partied on Turama together with lots of drugs and prostitutes. The Spanish court dismissed the rape case despite witnesses, semen, traces of drugs etc  were available.

Saudi based islamic Sharia organization OIC is the most powerful voting unit in UN and is also the foremost threat to UN's 1948 Human Rights Declaration. It has long since abandoned every Human Right that doesn't comply with Koranic Sharia.












OIC Secretary General, the Turk Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, and Alwaleed bin Talal. The other persons on the pic don't count because of their sex - other than if they say the right thing and if that is in accordance with that very Sharia that is so basically different from Human Rights that OIC had to abandon Human Rights altogether!

Wednesday, November 16, 2016

What's the connection between black cancer and black arrests?


Klevius: Why is black women's higher risk for cancer due to self imposed neglect of breast cancer screening, while black men's higher risk for criminal behavior is due to white "racism"?


Could it be that the eager hunt for non-existing racism* contributes to a "counter racism" which then propels and excuses a disproportionate amount of criminal behavior compared to a default state where skin color can't be used as an "excuse"?

* At least not more "racism" than among the blacks - probably much less.

Late-stage breast cancer affected almost twice as many black women (22% of black African women and 22% of black Caribbean women) than white women (13%).

This is for many reasons, including possible differences in tumour biology, low awareness of symptoms and screening and barriers to seeking help.

Heather Nelson of BME Cancer Voice: “Women of colour are less likely to go for screening. You’ll get leaflets through your door and they will be predominantly of white, middle-class women. There’s no representation of South Asian, African descent et cetera.
If you get information like that, you’re going to look and think, ‘That’s not about me.’”

One woman said: “A lot of us black people bury our head in the sand: ‘Oh, me, well, I don’t need to go, there’s nothing wrong with me.’”


How many non-black police etc. has Obama's race-race contributed to?

This is the black supremacist hate preacher Farra-Khan of Nation of Islam whom Obama's (and his wife's) house cleric Wright for some twenty years, rewarded.

Muslim born (apostate? - bio father and adoptive father were both muslims) Obama was voted "president"* by deliberately playing the race card hard, well knowing that true racism usually resides together with inferiority complex.

* Unconstitutional but forgiven because he was half black.

NYPD officers turning their back against NY mayor Blasio who together with muslim born (apostate?!) Mr X "president" Hussein Obama Soetoro (or whatever) has been agitating in support of black racism. NYPD officers Wenjian Liu and Rafael Ramos (top left) were murdered by a black thug (with a long criminal record) while sitting in their patrol car.


Obama's and Clinton's cynical use of the race card has resulted in more racial tensions incl. murders of non-blacks.

If you critically check historical events you will soon realize that racial hatred has usually stemmed from this same attitude.

When Klevius watched Missisippi burning first time he got very agitated and could barely see it to the end because of the tears. However, a completely different picture started soon to emerge.

The pattern has been there for more than a century. When vigilante groups evolved among white minorities in places with lots of poor uneducated blacks far from Washington, the "analysis" among wealthy urban whites was immediately directed against the "rural white deplorables" without a thought about the true nature of the problems behind, namely that young unemployed blacks often turned to a combination of criminals and "revengers" against the white population. And this "analysis" was often backed up by those blacks who had moved away via education and careers.

An important factor in this disgusting attitude is that it boosts the self-esteem of those privileged whites who use it because it works as a social insurance signaling "I'm not a white racist - it's the white deplorable working class down there". And it's easy because the "deplorables" can't move and the privileged whites are surrounded with other privileged blacks, muslims etc. who wouldn't dream of living with those they encourage to hate.

It's the same with muslims. By saying "islam is a great religion" and white non-muslims (especially less educated working class white Western men who live in the same poorer areas as uneducated working class muslims) are "racist", a trigger is released for letting the hate lose.

And while black "deplorables" are encouraged to hate by Nation of Islam, muslim "deplorables" are encouraged to hate by the very "great religion" that devastated Africa for some 1,400 years. 

Again, the only solution is to thoroughly read and apply the original 1948 Human Rights declaration against fascist and totalitarian racism and sexism.

Human Right don't accept segregation for hate!

How to make political career by creating hate - like Obama, Clinton etc.



People from black, Asian and minority ethnic backgrounds are more likely to be jailed for some crimes than those who are white, according to a government-commissioned report.
However, black people are known to be almost four times more likely to be in prison than white people and young black males are 10.5 times more likely than young white males to be arrested for robbery.

Peter Klevius: Does anyone really believe this is because of the "racism" of the white working class "deplorables" in the neighborhood or because of "racism" among officials caefully brainwashed about "diversity" throughout their education and threathened with harsh consequences if labeled "racist" or "islamophobic"? No, Klevius rather suggests tooking for the real problem in the political, medial and educational ivory towers. Moreover, Klevius suggests comparison with similar white groups, i.e. white outside the ivoy towers.

David Lammy, the MP for Tottenham in north London, said: “These emerging findings raise difficult questions about whether ethnic minority communities are getting a fair deal in our justice system. We need to fully understand why, for example, ethnic minority defendants are more likely to receive prison sentences than white defendants. These are complex issues, and I will dig deeper in the coming months to establish whether bias is a factor.”

Peter Klevius (who among many other things also happens to be a criminologist): Why not first try to eliminate the possibility of bias instead of searching for bias. The first option is the scientific one whereas the latter is the political one? Oh, you're a bias-politician, right.

Tuesday, November 15, 2016

While Trump in a couple of days eases tension between super powers, Theresa May hasn't after half a year figured out what Brexit means.


However, Theresa May "knows" that the Brits need more sharia and less "islamophobia"




With these "allies" she certainly isn't "islamophobic" - but how many Brits (incl. non-sharia "muslims") share her view? And what about the economy?

Trump talks to Russia but May (and BBC) wants confrontation with the world's second military and space super power - although only 12th in financial power. However, how wise is it to prefer confrontation instead of cooperation with the world's largest country with endless resources yet to be explored and utilized - starting with its strategic position between China and EU/UK.

India buys six times more technological products from China than it manages to sell. What would May like to import? Gems, clothing, chemicals or perhaps students - incl. some 15-20% muslim ones. Is that what the Brits wanted with Brexit - more muslim immigration?

Budget > Revenues:   
India  $172.10 billion Ranked 23th.    
Russia $416.80 billion Ranked 12th.   

On the foreign debt list UK is among the worst hit. Does May need a better financial advisor!


Is defending the most basic Human Rights against islamofascist sharia all that's needed to be classified as "right-wing extremist" and "islamophobe"?


Nowadays defending the most basic of Human Rights against islamofascist sharia totalitarianism seems to be enough to be labeled "far right". And if you happen to be too pale to classify as "colored", you will automatically be labeled "white supremacist" on top of it. Not to mention if you're a man and older than thirty and - God forbid - a deplorable non-zo ialist Atheist without any other moral guidance than the crazy thought about equality for all - incl. women.

The dirty gray zone of islam - created by PC "diversity" and "islam is a great relgion" and "that's not islam" and "there's only one islam"rhetoric - is the open gate to Koranic sharia fascism, racism and sexism.

Who is more "koranic"? BBC's muslim sharia presenter Saudi raised Mishal Husain, who doesn't fast on Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol etc., or the Saudi sponsored Islamic State and Saudi based and steered muslim world organization OIC with its basic Human Rights violating sharia declaration in UN? Do they all fit in islam? And if not, who has to go?

Mishal Husain: My way of life under no threat. Klevius: Thanks to Human Rights - not sharia!

According to Google 'racist muslims' don't exist - only "islamophobes".


Klevius question: Who created these "muslim communities" which are so extremely "sensitive"? And how come that muslims are always "targeted by "islamophobes" but never the other way round? And all these attacks by muslims around the world shouting "allahu akbar" and trying to stab people's necks etc?

When is it right for non-muslims to be offended?

Or why not do as Klevius has proposed since 9/11: Criminalize every Human Rightsophobic muslim who is racist and sexist based on a fascist koranic sharia ideology that violates the civilized idea about Human Rights equality. Because those "muslims" who share Human Rights equality pose no risk at all - except for islam's own survival of course.

Wednesday, November 9, 2016

Congratulations Donald, you may have contributed to halt the path to sharia inequality and islamofascist hate mongering!

Trump's winning slogan: "I think islam hates us"



Klevius comment: Sharia islamofascism isn't protected by US Constitution!

Monday, November 7, 2016

BBC lies for the purpose of helping sharia* supporting Clinton becoming president - while smearing Trump because he wants to vet sharia muslims

* Have you btw, dear reader, noticed how sharia supporting media in an extremely childish manner use to attack "those who think Obama is a muslim" and then always add in a bracket "which he is not". Klevius really wonders how low standard their readers have.

Why is US voting for someone who is "extremely careless in her handling of very sensitive, highly classified state information", and who is supporting Saudi sharia against women's right to equality?

One may also add the question whether a person who is actively searching for confrontation with a country that has equally many nuclear warheads as US but has shown no aggression against US, is a particularly wise choice.


What if BBC would be equally engaged in sharia muslim atrocities against girls/women as it is in Trump's women affairs?! If BBC really bothers about sexism against girls/women it should immediately start targeting sharia islam and Saudi islamofascism. Why so quiet?


This is how BBC "clears" Clinton and smears Trump

Klevius clarification to BBC in very simple English: Hillary Clinton isn't "cleared" by FBI. Far from it!

 "Cleared" from charges of criminal intent, yes, but clearly not cleared from her senseless criminal carelessness with US security. When muslim Lord Ahmed in UK killed a person in close connection with sending SMS, his intent wasn't probably to kill. However, his carelessness constituted a crime.

DUIT (driving under the influence of texting)

 Unbelievably he got away with a two weeks jail term while a Polish driver got 10 years for a similar crime in UK.


July 2016

FBI (James Comey, who was appointed by Obama): "Hillary Clinton is extremely careless in her handling of very sensitive, highly classified information."


November 2016


More emails were found from Hillary Clinton's aide Huma Abedin on the laptop belonging to her estranged husband, Anthony Weiner.


This is how Breitbart News (the one that Saudi sponsored Clinton wants to destroy as president) reports it:

Breitbart News 6 Nov 201628994

UPDATE: Republican National Committee (RNC) Chairman Reince Priebus reacts to this breaking news, with a statement reaffirming that the Clinton’s charity, which has raised billions of dollars, is still under FBI investigation:

“The FBI’s findings from its criminal investigation of Hillary Clinton’s secret email server were a damning and unprecedented indictment of her judgment. The FBI found evidence Clinton broke the law, that she placed highly classified national security information at risk and repeatedly lied to the American people about her reckless conduct. None of this changes the fact that the FBI continues to investigate the Clinton Foundation for corruption involving her tenure as secretary of state. Hillary Clinton should never be president.”

The original story starts below:

WASHINGTON (AP) — FBI director James Comey tells Congress review of additional Clinton emails does not change conclusion she should not face charges.

Comey says that agents have “reviewed all of the communications that were to or from Hillary Clinton” that were part of newly discovered emails.

Comey sent a letter to Congress Sunday informing them that the FBI has “not changed our conclusions” from earlier this year that she should not face charges.

The emails were found on the computer of Anthony Weiner, the estranged husband of top Clinton aide Huma Abedin.

Comey’s brief letter did not indicate how many emails were reviewed or what sort of material was found in Abedin’s emails.

Comey’s initial letter last month revealing that agents were reviewing the newly discovered email breathed new life into Donald Trump’s campaign. Trump has repeatedly warned that a cloud of scandal would follow Clinton to the White House.

Saturday, November 5, 2016

The worst choice for US women happens to be a woman

Women against women's equality


Here's an other Saudi raised muslim, BBC's sharia presenter Mishal Husain, disguised as a Brit with "British values"* (or is she perhaps an apostate?!) seems to think that too few Jews have been murdered by muslim terrorists. Judge for yourself!

* Incl. not fasting during Ramadan but instead drinking alcohol etc.

 

These US women fought in vain against men and women who denied them full equality - as is customary in the civilized world after the 1948 Human Rights declaration against fascist segregation of people because of their sex etc.
No, it's not about 5-10% US muslims, NOI supporters, Christian and Jewish fundamentalists etc - it's about the threat it constitutes against US girls/women!
The equality amendment is still waiting to be passed. And Hillary seems to support the very opposite, namely sharia islam.

Klevius wrote: There seems to be an almost total lack of sociologists challenging sex segregation. A possible exception is Pierre Bourdieu's cautious and defensive Masculine Domination which, by the way, may well be his thinnest book. Already the title seems to try avoiding a closer look on feminine domination (of females).

Muslim born (apostate?) and raised by his muslim adoptive father, Barrakeh Hussain Obama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever)  was (together with Michelle Obama) for some 20 years an eager admirer of one of US worst racist hate preachers. Hillary Clinton has for an equal long period befriended her personal aide, the Saudi raised muslim Huma Abedin with extremely suspicious connections.


Should a US president bee aided by Human Rights or Human Rights violating sharia?

M.G. Oprea: Last week, the Southern Poverty Law Center released a list of 15 anti-Muslim extremists, including writers, intellectuals, and activists. This “Field Guide” is meant to help journalists tell the “good guys” from the “bad guys” by providing them with ammunition against outspoken critics of Islam.

The people on this list are lambasted for talking about violence in Islam, unequal treatment of women, the increasing number of Islamist advisors to our government—including Muslim Brotherhood-backed groups like the Islamic Society of North America and the Center for American-Islamic Relations—and the growing treatment of Islam as a protected class, mostly at the behest of the aforementioned Islamist groups.

This guide called what these writers and thinkers produce “propaganda” that’s “baseless” and “exploitative” of terrorist attacks. It accuses them of “demoniz[ing] the entire Islamic faith” and “inspiring hate-based violence.” Importantly, the SPLC used the term “extremist” to describe the people on their list (that’s left-speak for “terrorist”).

One of the individuals they profiled is author and women’s rights activist Ayaan Hirsi Ali, who works to end the cruel practice of female genital mutilation in the Muslim world. She’s also known for co-producing a short film on women’s rights with Dutch filmmaker Theo Van Gogh. He was brutally beheaded by a Dutch-Moroccan Muslim, who also threatened Hirsi Ali’s life.
People Who Talk Are Bad, People Who Shoot Misunderstood

But if Hirsi Ali, who has called for an Islamic reformation, is tantamount to a terrorist, then what does that make the Orlando shooter or the San Bernardino attackers? We’ve reached a point of absurdity in our national conversation on Islam, where religious terrorists are just misunderstood or mentally ill, but activists working against the persistent problem of violence in Islam are terrorists.

The Left shies away from terms like “Islamic terrorist,” and “Muslim extremist,” opting instead for the uber-sensitive and inchoate “violent extremism,” as though one could be an extremist about nothing in particular. That’s because they reject any association between Muslims and violence, no matter how many terrorist attacks are carried out in the name of Allah. Because groups like the SPLC refuse to acknowledge this relationship, even in its weakest form, they consequently view any mention of it as anti-Muslim.


Sha'i ben-Tekoa: One candidate for most amazing video of the presidential race on the Net now is an anonymous 8-minute biography of Huma Abedin, former right-hand woman to American Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and (until last Friday) her closest associate for twenty years.

See video here

Snippets of Abedin’s biography have floated through the blogosphere for years, but this is the first coherent exposé that tempts a reasonable person to consider the current crisis surrounding Hillary Clinton and emails as part of the greatest spying operation, the greatest secret agent story, in history.

Huma Abedin, though born in the States, grew up in Saudi Arabia, ages 2-18, in a family whose livelihood was provided by the same network of Saudi jihadis connected to Al-Qaida on September 11, 2001. Indeed, on that very day, Huma herself was a salaried employee of a Muslim think tank run by her mother, a major figure in the women’s section of the Muslim Brotherhood. Huma’s mother, completely enrobed, supports female genital mutilation, the world conquest of sharia, and other principles of the same version of Islam that Osama bin Ladin lived and died by. Huma’s brother also works for this Muslim Brotherhood-funded operation.

In a word, Huma was raised in a culture of Islam at its most barbaric and violent. It is now chilling to contemplate that for the four years of Hillary Clinton’s position of as Secretary of State, Abedin had access to everything Hillary did. And now the FBI has found 650,000 Hillary emails on her perverted husband’s computer.

Taqqiya is the Muslim “virtue” of lying to achieve your goal; of dissembling. And what better disguise for a female jihadi than to be married to a Jew?

And the deception in this spy story does not stop here. Consider Barack Obama’s first inaugural address (see 'The President’s First Insult”) in which he praised to the skies not America’s Judeo-Christian civilization but this country of “Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus,” and in the next sentence promised a new beginning with Islam. In the first case, he demoted the Jews from their traditional place as America’s second most important religion, displaced by Islam, and in the second, promised a new relationship with Islam that was deeply puzzling. Governments do not have relationships with religions but other governments. What did he have in mind?

Three months later, ironically on April Fool’s day, Obama crossed paths with the king of Saudi Arabia and bowed deeply to him, which was doubly an anti-American gesture. First, American presidents traditionally never bow to foreign kings because the American Revolution was not only about independence from England but a rejection of monarchy as a system of government.

Second, the king that Obama bowed to so obsequiously was not just any king but ruler of the country where fifteen of the nineteen Muslim sky devils on September 11, 2001 in those four hijacked airliners were raised in his religion and culture, as was their terror master Osama bin Ladin. The king of Saudi Arabia is also billed as the “Guardian of the Two Mosques,” the holiest in Islam in the birthplace of Islam, to this day a country where sharia law rules. What a truly America-identified, patriotic president, unlike Obama, might have done on meeting the king was demand that he bow down to him and beg forgiveness for what his fellow Arab-Muslims did to his fellow Americans.

Then came -- before Obama had been in office even a year -- the satanic massacre at Ft. Hood committed by a homicidal Muslim maniac shouting “Allahu Akbar!” After he murdered thirteen fellow American soldiers, Obama issued his fatwa that no one was to connect Islam to the massacre.

As president, he also ordered that all military texts be shredded if they contained language connecting Islam to terrorism and that new ones, without the offending passages, be printed, at taxpayer expense, of course. He had promised in his run for the presidency he was going “fundamentally change” America and surely this was part of it.

And when Muslims in the Middle East began to chop off American heads, Obama critiqued Christians for the Crusades.

He released important terror chieftains from Guantanamo who returned to terror in order to bring back one American traitor to Islam.

He toppled American ally Hosni Mubarak, which allowed the Muslim Brotherhood to come to power in Egypt after generations of Egyptian governments suppressing that cult.

Obama imported into the United States almost one million Muslims and virtually no Christians.

This list could go on with many more examples, including the alleged placement of suspected Muslim Brothers in U.S. government agencies. But as to the crisis at hand, viz. the crimes of presidential candidate Hillary Clinton: in earlier decades of the American Republic, a basic requirement for receiving a security clearance was the absence of any association with dubious characters. It was not enough for a person to be “innocent until proven guilty,” the standard for a civil court proceeding. A person had to be “above suspicion,” which he or she would not be if they associated with others who were not above suspicion. It was likely cowardice, fear of this difficult woman, that deterred government officials who hand out security clearances from telling Mrs. Clinton that Huma Abedin’s family connections were not above suspicion and so she would not be given a security clearance and could not work for her.

The future may uncover a real smoking gun or two as evidence of collusion between Obama, Abedin, and a Muslim Brotherhood that is publicly and shamelessly committed to destroying, or, in Obama’s words, “fundamentally changing” America.

But of more immediate concern, the Hillary Clinton-Huma Abedin relationship is enough to expose the former as either a jihadi herself, which is highly unlikely since she has no principles and believes in nothing but money and power; or, she is now exposed as utterly incompetent and incapable of functioning as president, whose first responsibility is Commander-in-Chief of the United States armed forces. The crime of having a private email, which likely was hacked by every hacker who wanted to, reveals less malevolence than gross insensitivity, indeed a colossal incompetence when it comes to the vital necessity of secure communications.

Hillary Clinton is not only, apparently, a major crook; she is a complete idiot in the field of national security, a fool who fell for Huma Abedin’s taqqiya. For this alone, her presidency would be a national disaster of unimaginable dimensions.



 

Tuesday, November 1, 2016

When BBC "discusses" sharia courts, it all instead ends up with a "discussion" about "islamophobia".




Trump (US) and UKIP (UK) got most of their voters because people are fed up with Human Rights violating sharia muslims.


Trump and original UKIP wanted (just as ordinary Americans and Brits) to vet/control for them and only let in "muslims" who don't sympathize with racist and sexist views on non-muslims - i.e the classic sharia that clashes head on with the most basic of Human Rights equality.

Just consider if what sharia courts are allowed to tell muslims would be applied to ordinary Americans and Brits. Hateful speech and hate crimes!

When BBC News today "discussed" sharia courts it predictably turned into blaming "islamophobia". Even the last word uttered (by one of the guests from the Labour party) was 'islamophobic'.

Noteworthy is also that the muslim who represented the 100 muslim women's protest against scrutiny of sharia courts, called herself a 'feminist'. And as you probably already knew, Klevius is in such a context to be called an "anti-feminist" because how could he possibly belong to a category that approves of robbing girls and women from their most basic Human Rights equality inscribed in the 1948 Human Rights declaration.

Always remember: Sharia courts constitute an exception from the law of the land. In other words, a black justice hole where girls, women and others are trapped due to the "muslim sharia community" playing on "tradition", "culture", peer/famil/kin pressure etc.


Muslim woman asking for sharia on BBC: Muslim women will be abused and it will go underground without sharia courts.

Klevius: So why would muslim women be more abused than non-muslim women UK?




.