The Saudi Fuhrer of Saudi based islamofascist OIC

Theresa May is for sharia and EU - but against EU's Human Rights Court which condemns sharia

Sayeeda Warsi like all sharia muslims is against basic Human Rights

If you don't agree on the most basic Human Rights, then you're a racist/sexist hater

Klevius is probably now the world's foremost expert on sex segregation (sad isn't it), and islam (the worst cime ever) is the foremost expression of sex segregation. By 'islam' Klevius means the same as true sharia supporting (and therefore against the most basic of Human Rights) muslims.

British muslim jihadists: Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo (who murdered Le

Tuesday, December 30, 2014

If you call for islam you inevitably also call for evil islam (i.e. the original islam)


OIC, the islamofascist  monster that hijacked UN which was supposed to be our bulwark against such totalitarian fascism


Why are muslims and Saudi islamofascists equally protected from criticism against their senseless Human Rights violations?


In fact, Human Rights are considered terrorism by the Saudi islamofascist dictator family - and by OIC.


Why are we afraid of veiled people? Klevius: Because they so often* turn out to be racist** muslims who hate us! But a more important question is what and who incite such islamofascist hatred?

* Compare the widespread muslim support for al-Qaeda, Islamic State, and numerous lesser muslim organizations and individuals.

** You're a racist (not to mention you're sexist too) if you're a muslim adhering to any type of sharia because sharia is against the most basic of the Universal Human Rights (compare how  OIC - all muslims world Ummah - had to violate Human Rights for the purpose of keeping Human Rights violating islamic sharia)  and disparaging non-muslims which they call "infidels" etc. And in doing this, muslims open themselves up for criticism. But not even this can be tolerated by racist/sexist muslims who want to criminalize criticism against their own violations against Universal Human Rights!



Abu Dhabi's burqa hiding muslim woman murdered a non-muslim mother in the restroom while the victim's two young children waited outside. Abu Dhabi encourages islam and sharia - so why do people even go there?




Eager convert proselytizer  Myriam Francois-Cerrah applauds islam while islam's guardian Saudi Arabia jails and lashes Raif Badawi fordaring to talk about Human Rights.


Without any objection heard there's a lot of racist and sexist smear going on against "white males" as a group - however not much against islamofascist Arab oil billionaires clad in sun/sand protecting Bedouin head scarves (indoors)! Why?!




Right, they belong to that overly protected vulnerable and easily offended "minority" called muslims who are under attack from a very few peaceful (but apparently so dangerous and disgusting) Human Rights defenders (i.e. not sharia compliant) called "islamophobes".

Raif Badawi is such an "islamophobe" whose friends and family now have chosen to distance themselves from or even turning against him. In other words, they have, like so many others, helped the Saudi islamofascists instead of a Human Rights defender.


Badawi did nothing wrong according to Western standards other than start a forum that was aimed at "a new generation of Saudi young men and women, who want to express themselves in a way that they can counter the overwhelming majority of clerics and religious people."

Now he has to kneel on the ground and receive 50 lashes every week until he has received 1,000 lashes. Happy now Myriam Francois-Cerrah? Right, Klevius almost forgot that the very fact that Saudi Arabia is the guardian of islam makes it having nothing to do with islam in your perverted thinking?


Klevius wrote

August 18, 2013

When Saudi blogger gets 600 lashes and 7 yrs in a Saudi prison, BBC only reports he was freed (from death sentence)

 

A screen dump on a Google news search today on 'BBC Raif Gadawi' gives this shameful result:





A general search gives this:





And this kind of utterly disgusting, not to say purely criminal, behavior from BBC just continues while it simultaneously uses all its resources to silence, misrepresent, or falsify facts about islam, Sharia and OIC while using every opportunity to air the views of islamofascists and their supporters.
 
 

Saudi islamofascism, a Saudi "islamophobe" and BBC's silence



How islamofascism works


When should "islamophobes" be designated authors of conscience, persecuted for not only peacefully exercising their right to freedom of expression but more importantly, for defending Universal Human Rights.


On July 30, 2013 Saudi media reported that Raif Badawi had been sentenced to seven years in prison and 600 lashes for founding an Internet forum that "violates Islamic values and propagates liberal thought". The court also ordered the website closed.

On 17 June 2012, he was arrested on a charge of insulting Islam through electronic channels, and in December of that year was also cited for apostasy, a conviction which carries an automatic death sentence. Badawi's website also hosted material criticizing "senior religious figures" and Badawi had suggested that Imam Muhammad ibn Saud Islamic University had become "a den for terrorists."

The family of Badawi's wife subsequently filed a court action to forcibly divorce the couple on grounds of Badawi's alleged apostasy.

On May 7, 2014 Badawi was re-sentenced to 1000 lashes and ten years in prison. He also received a fine of 1 million riyal (equal to about $267,000).

Badawi's lawyer Waleed Abulkhair has been jailed after setting up Monitor of Human Rights in Saudi Arabia, a human rights organization. He is being charged for "setting up an unlicensed organization” and for “breaking allegiance with the ruler”. His requests to license the organization were denied.

Badawi has stated that he was a Muslim but "everyone has a choice to believe or not believe.

According to Human Rights Watch in its review of Saudi Arabia's membership in the United Nations Human Rights Council, "Over the last year Saudi authorities have harassed, investigated, prosecuted, and jailed prominent peaceful dissidents and human rights activists on vague charges based solely on their peaceful practice of basic rights, particularly the right to free expression, including Mohammed al-Qahtani, Abdullah al-Hamid, Mohammed al-Bajadi, Abd al-Kareem al-Khodr, Omar al-Saeed, and Raif Badawi."



Ask yourself: Why hasn't BBC and their Saudi raised muslim sharia presenter Mishail Husain, properly informed you about this and OIS's sharia declaration?


These jihadists, Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo, may represent three main channels for spreading islamofascism: The reproductive, the cultural, and the militant.

However, the by far most important islamofascist power is Saudi based OIC and its sharia declaration through UN, steered by the Saudi islamofascist Iyad Madani. Even with Islamic State taking over Saudi Arabia it would become easier to handle because as it is now the Saudi islamofascist billionaires can freely travel etc in the West, while with Islamic State such would not be tolerated anymore.

The counting is still out but the Saudi dictator family has probably still caused much more suffering and murdering with its islamic hate mongering than has Islamic State so far.



First time Klevius read OIC's sharia declaration he thought it was a joke or some poorly done pre-college homework. Judge for yourself!

Acknowledgement: Klevius has simplified and clarified the text. However, make no mistake. The text hasn't lost anything of its original meaning.

This is OIC's disgusting and pompous  Human Rights violating sharia declaration (the so called "islamic human rights") that an islamist, or islamist supporting voting bloc managed to pass through UN. However, don't panic. It's not legal because the UN is supposed to be a democratic institution and as such can not logically uphold decisions against democracy and Universal Human Rights. In other words, what has happened in UN is a disastrous deception that has nothing to do with UN's original aim. It should therefore be seen as nullified through its own manifesto of which some articles are presented below.


Allah made the Islamic Ummah as the best community which should guide all humanity that is confused because of different and conflicting beliefs and ideologies.

Klevius explanation: Childish but dangerous totalitarian fanatism. The utterly naive expression can be understood only as a product of a pathetic balancing between language borrowed from the real Human Rights declaration from 1948 and then mixed up with islamic nonsense cherry picked to fit the Saudi dictator family plus, to a lesser and varying degree, their supporters.

Mankind is still, and shall remain, in dire need of islam.

Klevius explanation: Wishful fanatic thinking that islam should rule the world.

Sharia is an integral part of the Islamic religion and no one shall have the right to abolish it either in whole or in part or to violate or ignore it in as much as it is binding divine commands, which are contained in the Koran and which were sent through Muhammad. Safeguarding sharia is an act of worship whereas the neglect or violation thereof is an abominable sin.

Klevius explanation: A definition of a muslim.

All men are equal - in terms of basic human dignity and basic obligations and responsibilities.

Klevius explanation: All muslim men of the right sect are equal - but not women and non-muslims. Every country can have its own sectarian version of sharia (e.g. wahhabi sharia in Saudi Arabia). 'Dignity', 'obligations' and 'responsibilities' are code words for sex slave apartheid and the inferior status of women in islam.

All human beings are Allah's subjects, and the most loved by Him are those who are most beneficial to His subjects, and no one has superiority over another except on the basis of piety and good deeds.

Klevius explanation: 'Those who are most beneficial' moeans those wh best serve the Saudi dictator family.

It is prohibited to take away life except for a sharia prescribed reason.

Klevius explanation: In Saudi jurisdiction the support of Universal Human Rights is equated with terrorism - and due sentences.

Bodily harm is prohibited to breach without a Sharia-prescribed reason.

Klevius explanation: Wife and slave beating etc.

Parents and those in such like capacity have the right to choose the type of education - provided they take into consideration the principles of sharia.

Klevius explanation: Main aim being to make the kids muslim and see to it that they stay that way (apostasy ban etc).

Both parents are entitled to different rights from their children, and relatives are entitled to rights from their kin - in accordance with sharia.

Klevius explanation: Meaning the muslim man has the right to the kids.

Every man shall have the right - within the framework of the sharia - to free movement and to select his place of residence whether within or outside his country and if persecuted, is entitled to seek asylum in another country. The country of refuge shall be obliged to provide protection to the asylum-seeker until his safety has been attained - unless asylum is motivated by committing an act regarded by the sharia as a crime.

Klevius explanation: Only muslims have this right. And an apostate muslim isn't persecuted according to sharia because s/he is simply the worst of criminals.

Everyone shall have the right to enjoy the fruits of his scientific, literary, artistic or technical labour of which he is the author; and he shall have the right to the protection of his moral and material interests stemming therefrom - provided it is not contrary to the principles of the sharia.

Klevius explanation: Means that this right only applies to muslims and non-muslims who submit to Human Rights violating sharia.

There shall be no crime or punishment - except as provided for in the sharia.

Klevius explanation: Everything that is against sharia is a crime and could render punishment.

Everyone shall have the right to express his opinion freely - in accordance with the principles of the sharia.

Klevius explanation: You think this must be a joke? No, it's pure old fashion fanatic totalitarianism.

Information may not be exploited or misused in such a way as may violate sanctities and the dignity of Muhammad, undermine sharia or disintegrate, corrupt, harm or weaken islam.

Klevius explanation: They got at least that right. An empty parasitic slave ideology that lacks any other foundation logic than the mysterious Allah (whose intentions/will even the muslims admit they have no clue about) is in extreme need of protection from scrutiny. Extremely laughable was it not for all the people who have suffered and died because of this hateful ideology.

It is not permitted to excite nationalistic or doctrinal hatred.

Klevius explanation: You're not allowed to criticize the Saudi dictator family or wahhabi islamofascism.

Everyone shall have the right to participate, directly or indirectly in the administration of his country's public affairs. He shall also have the right to assume public office - as long as he complies with sharia.

Klevius explanation: 'Everyone' means a muslim who complies with the muslim dictator family. Remember, we are dealing with islam and its guardian in the first place. This is also the aim of the islamofascist so called "diversity training" that is sprayed all over our Western institutions etc. Sadly, it is aggressive islamofascism, not timid Human Rights voices that is let through.

All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic sharia.

Klevius explanation: What else?! This simply means the complete elimination of any possibility for an individual to take cover under the Human Rights declaration form 1948.

The Islamic sharia is the only source of reference for the explanation or clarification of any of the articles of this Declaration.

Klevius explanation: So why even bother to write this declaration when it gives full freedom for every member state to tailor their own sharia? The answer is of course UN. By having "islamic human rights" sanctioned via UN, OIC's member states in general but Saudi Arabia in particular, can avoid UN criticism against Human Rights violations.


Klevius concluding advice: When you're done laughing - start thinking! Honestly, isn't this the worst offense ever against what it means to be a human being! And as such, well in line with its origin - the worst ideological crime ever against humanity.


Muslims could have the freedom to look, behave and believe freely under the 1948 Human Rights declaration. But that's not enough for muslims - they want sharia, i.e, violation of Human Rights! 

Sunday, December 28, 2014

How many more Syrians are Saudi supporting Obama and Cameron prepared to let suffer and die rather than talking with Assad?

 

Saudi Arabia is the main cause of blood baths in Mideast - and the one state that takes the least responsibility for it


Saudi Arabia takes zero refugees from the disaster it created in Syria.


Amnesty International: 7 ways Saudi Arabia is silencing people online


1. Gagging anyone with an independent opinion

“Overall, the situation in Saudi Arabia is very bad, particularly from the point of view of people with independent opinions who go against the grain. Recently, there have been investigations, arrests and short-term detentions of journalists, athletes, poets, bloggers, activists and tweeters.”

2. Blaming everything on terrorism

“The authorities are fragile. They seek to gag and stifle dissent using various means, including the shameful Terrorism Law that has become a sword waved in the faces of people with opinions. Courts issue prison sentences of 10 years or more as a result of a single tweet. Atheists and people who contact human rights organizations are attacked as ‘terrorists’.”

3. Personal attacks on bloggers

“I have been harassed in many ways. The authorities approached the internet providers hosting my personal website and asked them to block it and delete all the content. They also dispatched security officers to tell me to stop what I was doing in my own and my family’s best interests. I was later officially banned from blogging and threatened with arrest if I continued. I succumbed and stopped in order to protect my family.”

4. Bans, false accusations and being fired from your job

“There are many cases of bloggers being restricted or banned. Some of them – whom I know – are still being investigated about blogs they wrote in 2008, even though they aren’t involved in blogging anymore. Saudi bloggers can also be fired from their jobs and prevented from making a living. Many face false allegations that they are ‘atheists’or ‘demented’. Restrictions are imposed on almost every aspect of the blogger’s life.”

5. Far-reaching online surveillance and censorship

“Censorship is at its maximum, especially after passing the Terrorism Law. A poet was arrested as a result of a single tweet which indirectly criticized King Abdullah using symbolic language. With millions of web users in Saudi Arabia, this means the authorities are keeping an eye on everything that’s being written. We have also received reports through international newspapers that Saudi Arabia uses surveillance to hack and monitor activists’ accounts.”

6. Deploying an electronic army

“The authorities have powerful cyber armies which give a false impression of the situation in Saudi Arabia to deceive people overseas. They launch websites, YouTube channels and blogs to target activists and opponents, and depict them as atheists, infidels and agents who promote disobedience of the Ruler. By contrast, these websites, channels and blogs often praise the state and its efforts. I have personally been the victim of such state orchestrated campaigns that harmed my reputation.”

7. Brutal punishments

“Raif Badawi’s case further demonstrates the brutality of a state that still rules through punishments from the Middle Ages, like flogging, hefty fines and exaggerated prison terms. The Saudi government needs to know that it doesn’t own the world and that it can’t silence the world’s voice with its money.”

The kingdom has also launched a powerful cyber army to create “a false impression of the situation in Saudi Arabia to deceive people overseas” and target Saudi activists and opponents, depicting them as “atheists, infidels and agents who promote disobedience of the ruler,” the blogger said.

Earlier this year, Saudi authorities sentenced Raif Badawi to 10 years in jail and one thousand lashes for only setting up a website.

Reporters Without Borders has named Saudi Arabia, which is ruled by a hereditary royal system, as one of the “enemies of the Internet” for its censorship and surveillance.

In July, then UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Navi Pillay, censured Saudi Arabia for harassing human rights activists under a failed judicial system.

Activists say there are over 30,000 political prisoners in Saudi Arabia.

Saudi authorities have also defied calls by international rights groups to end what has been described as violations of women’s rights in the monarchy.


Islam is the worst ideological crime history knows about and Saudi Arabia is the most intolerant Human Rights abuser - yet both are desperately protected by Western leaders


Jürgen Todenhöfer (German expert on the situation in Iraq and Syria): They (muslim terrorists) are extremely brutal. Not just head-cutting. I'm talking about the strategy of religious cleansing. That's their official philosophy. They are talking about 500 million people who have to die.

The West doesn’t want democracy in Syria. The biggest resistance to
democratic reforms in Syria comes currently out of Obama's and Cameron's policy. Obama once said: "Strong presidents talk to their enemies." Why doesn't he just do it? The fact that Assad is not a Democrat cannot be an obstacle. America's favorite friends in the Arab world, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Co. are not either.

The West 'has no concept' of how dangerous the group (i.e. original islam - Klevius correction) is and says they want to 'kill all non-believers and enslave their children'.

The West has underestimated the risk posed by Islamic State 'dramatically'. IS is 'much smarter and more dangerous than our leaders believe'.

'The city of Mosul [in Iraq], with a population of three million, for example, is controlled by IS with about 5,000 fighters. To crush them with bombs means reducing all of Mosul to rubble and killing tens of thousands of civilians.'

Todenhöfer said that he constantly heard the view that ISIS want to 'conquer the world'.

This is the largest religious cleansing strategy that has ever been planned in human history.

Klevius: I beg to differ. It's only a tiny top of the iceberg of the largest religious cleansing strategy that has ever been planned in human history.

In Syria, however, the protesters were met with fierce opposition from within their own population. To date Bashar Al-Assad has at least as many followers as the opposition, whether we like this or not. Almost the entire alawite, christian and other minorities have rallied behind him. They make up about 28 percent of the population. Also parts of the Sunni middle class do support him; the West has completely misjudged the situation.

The legitimacy of the Syrian protesters was lost, when in early May 2011 Qatar and Saudi Arabia began to supply the Syrian uprising with money and weapons

In line with international law, money and arms supplied for the support of uprisings in other countries remains a violation of international law and an unlawful encroachment on the sovereignty of states. Barack Obama or Angela Merkel would share this view, if Syria were to provide American or German insurgents with weapons.

The Sunni states of Saudi Arabia and Qatar pursue in Syria - tacitly supported and controlled by their big brother, the USA - other goals than the sympathetic Syrian protesters of the first days. In the downfall of the Alawite Assad they see an opportunity to weaken their nemesis, which is shiite Iran, and who is Syria's ally. Therefore they support in Syria specific Sunni extremists who regard Shiites and Alawites as heretics.

In late 2011 this remote-controlled war of faith and by proxy attracted like a magnet the Salafist-Wahhabi terrorist organization Al-Qaeda, which calls its Syrian branch Jabhat-Al-Nusra. Because of their member's great personal courage and fighting strength, it has become the most powerful and most potent rebel group in Syria. As is the general case of the global support for Al-Qaeda's terrorism it does receive its support and direction specifically from within Saudi Arabia. Its Saudi backers believe that this strategy will not only weaken Iran, but will also help in spreading the radical Salafist-Wahhabi faith, to which - and much to their chagrin - only two percent of the world's Muslim population adhere.

The number of muslim jihadists in Syria is more than 100,000, and counting.

The claim of the United States that they could ensure through inspections at the Turkish border that only "moderate" insurgents receive Saudi or Qatari weapons is almost killingly funny. Jabhat-Al- Nusra, being the strongest rebel-group inside Syria, has no difficulty to get to the weapons it needs.

The type of government most of the extremists aim for, is not going to be any better than the current system, it will be worse.

The majority of the terrorist insurgents, i.e. at least 60,000 are pious muslims. At least 5,000 are foreign "jihadists" from Tunisia, Libya, Jordan, Iraq and Europe. The "Free Syrian Army", have, at most, 20,000 fighters. Every day they do loose supporters to the pious terrorist muslims who pay and fight better.


Klevius: Doesn't take a lot to be smarter than Obama, does it. Without his skin color he could never have been "elected president". However, what is problematic with Jürgen Todenhöfer's analysis is his naive Western illusion of there being somewhere "a good islam" behind all that Allahu Akbar blood shed despite the fact that his own reporting 100% fits historical facts about the origin of islam as well as fits all the "puzzling" gaps.

Western taqiya islam has nothing at all to do with islam and its evil origin. Your local imam is either full of wishful thinking or taqiya.

And in the bottom you always have the inescapable - and deeply troubling - fact that the Saudi dictator family not only steers all the world's muslims via UN but also gets 100% support from leaders such as Obama and Cameron.


Iyad Madani, the Saudi Fuhrer of Saudi based OIC, the worst Human Rights violator.

Thursday, December 25, 2014

2014 - the year when muslim hatred against Human Rights and non-muslims peaked


Telling ‘the truth in love’


Klevius approach to mankind is and has always been love. And there can not be a better tool for universal love than the Universal Human Rights declaration. However, such love of the equality principle has now by evil forces been named "hate" while criticism against islamic hatred is called "islamophobia".

Muslim haters reject Human Rights - but do all muslims hate Human Rights?


Klevius answer: If you by 'muslims' mean sharia supporting muslims the answer is definitely yes. However, if you include as "muslims" those who reject sharia in all Human Rights violating forms, then Klevius and the majority of muslim top clerics as well as Saudi based and Saudi steered muslim world organization OIC don't see them as real muslims. According to Saudi Arabia and OIC some of the most basic of Human Rights are seen as grave criminal offenses against "islamic human rights" (sharia).
 


Supreme Court of Canada: 'speech may only be deemed hateful when assessed to be so objectively from the perspective of a reasonable person, with full consideration of the circumstances'

Klevius: Which makes sharia support a form of hate speech!

Under Human Rights a woman may choose to lead a sharia style life if she so wishes. However, under sharia women may no.

The "islamophobia" campaigners continue protecting the worst ever ideological crime on the planet! Why?!

Facebook: Our mission has always been to make the world more open and connected. We seek to provide a platform where people can share and surface content, messages and ideas freely, while still respecting the rights of others.

Klevius: This (i.e. Human Rights) is the foundation on which everything Klevius writes firmly stands on. In other words, the only muslims who could possibly be offended are those who support or commit Human Rights violations.

Facebook: While there is no universally accepted definition of hate speech, as a platform we define the term to mean direct and serious attacks on any protected category of people based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, disability or disease.

Klevius: So "infidels", i.e. non religious people are not protected. But muslim terrorists and Human Rights violators are!? Or is it just some muslims (who? sharia rejecting "muslims"?!).





The Islamic State constitutes a perfect time machine for those who want to understand the origin of islam


Islam, an ideology originating in and based on parasitism (e.g. slavery) and terror (jihad), is a monstrous hate crime throughout 1,400 years. Its victims can be counted in hundreds of millions (possibly as many as there are muslims today). Its Sharia is ALWAYS against Human Rights. Yet criticism of islam is called "islamophobia"!






'Telling the truth  with love', however, doesn't necessitate you to love the open or silent haters


Islamic State says it is prepared to murder as many non-muslims as it takes - no matter how many hundreds of millions. And the number of their supporters among silent muslims is high and counting.


The difference between hateful muslims and Klevius is that Klevius doesn't ask for retaliation - just the right to exist on an equal level with everyone else on the planet.



 So when muslim born (apostate?!)* Mr X** "president"*** Hussain**** Obama Soetoro (or whatever)***** wants to criminalize criticism of islamic hate speech, he has made himself sharia compliant and therefore against Human Rights.

* Born to a muslim father who hadn't committed apostasy (the worst crime in islam) made him a muslim. Moreover, he was also raised as a muslim because his adoptive father Soetoro was a muslim.
** All his records are labeled secret.
*** His mother was too young as the only US parent for to fulfill the constitutional criterion. He listened for some 20 years to one of the worst black supremacist racists' preachings. He used the race card in the election and he has violated the spirit of the US Constitution ever since.
**** more in line with his muslim heritage
***** sarcasm

Wednesday, December 24, 2014

Racial profiling of blacks and muslims - and the lack of intervention against black and muslim hate crimes


Klevius' dictionary entry of today: 


"Diversity training", meaning

1 support for islam and Saudi islamofascism
2 support for racial segregation* and agitation

* Do note that the first sentence on Klevius' first web appearance (re. Human Rights) goes like this: 'Peter Klevius' definition of The HOLY (negative) HUMAN RIGHTS vs. RACE & SEX SEGREGATION (i e rapetivism).'

NYPD officers turning their back against NY mayor Blasio who together with muslim born (apostate?!) Mr X "president" Hussein Obama Soetoro (or whatever) has been agitating in support of black racism. NYPD officers Wenjian Liu and Rafael Ramos (top left) were murdered by a black thug (with a long criminal record) while sitting in their patrol car.


Whereas every muslim is tied to Human Rights violating islam via its sharia, a black police has no such a tie to black criminals. However, because blacks in certain areas are hugely over represented in crime stats (hence also proportionally in general stats), it would be quite strange if equally many whites were pulled over, arrested etc. in such areas.

So when you see a muslim you can be sure he supports Human Rights violating sharia, otherwise he wouldn't be a true muslim according to all the world's muslims world organization Saudi based and Saudi led OIC which constitutes the biggest voting bloc in UN and which calls sharia "islamic human rights" for the sole purpose of duping you and now also making it possible to sell weapons to Human Rights violating Saudi Arabia despite the new UN initiative which forbids weapon sales to Human Rights violating nations. So the trick is simple. Saudi Arabia doesn't violate "islamic human rights", i.e. sharia, because Human Rights violating sharia has been incorporated within UN behind your back by the help of some of the worst Human Rights offenders, i.e. OIC the biggest voting bloc in UN. Moreover, the Saudi islamofascists also managed to exclude those muslim OIC member states it disliked by arranging for Syria to be suspended from OIC and Russia (an ally of Syria and Iran) to be included in the UN ban against weapon export.

Can you now see the bottomless hypocrisy and bigotry in your political leaders when they brag about not selling weapons to Human Rights violators while simultaneously forcing your kids, police etc with more islam propaganda "diversity training"?


Iyad Madani, the Saudi Fuhrer of Saudi based OIC, the world's foremost Human Rights violator.

So why hasn't BBC's Saudi raised muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain told you about this?




Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain (BBC's sharia presenter) and Michael Adebolajo all have islam and its Human Rights violating sharia in common

Sunday, December 21, 2014

How long will it take to understand why Klevius calls islam a racist hate crime?!

 

Muslim born (apostate?) Mr X "president" Hussein Obama Soetoro (or whatever) is ultimately responsible for the new wave of hate crimes in the US!




Islam is from its origin made a tool for hateful racism and sexism. That's the "secret" behind its initial "success" that PC historians and other islam supporters desperately try to blink



Hundreds of NYPD members turned their backs on de Blasio as he entered a news conference. The police officers, Liu Wenjin and Raphael Ramos were killed in the Bedford-Stuyvesant area of NY.


The murderer who just killed two NYC cops is a black muslim named Ismaaiyl Abdullah Brinsley. The two NYPD officers were a "white" looking man and a beardless Mongolic looking man, i.e. the first was probably seen as "a legitimate target" because of his (beardless) skin color and the latter because he was seen as someone typically not a muslim. Who knows what happened in the dark brain of the black murderer. However, one thing is absolutely clear - with more muslims in the police force we will see more similar crimes but now from the police side. Do we want that or do we even need it? And what about the majority(?!) of blacks who don't want to keep up race segregation based on hate.

This black muslim thug was allegedly on a revenge mission for Eric Garner and Michael Brown. As a side note they all three suffered from heavy overweight, something that seems to affect African-Americans more than other "races". Just like criminal behavior.

“A statement from the Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association said: ‘The mayor’s hands are literally dripping with our blood because of his words, actions and policies and we have, for the first time in a number of years, become a “wartime” police department. We will act accordingly.’
Bill de Blasio hit back: ‘It’s unfortunate that in a time of great tragedy, some would resort to the irresponsible, overheated rhetoric that angers and divides people.'”

“Officers have complained that the citizens, as well as politicians including mayor Bill de Blasio, turned their back on them, while protesters routinely refer to the police as murderers and racists.”

“Thousands are blaming the double murder on de Blasio following his recent support for protesters in the city marching in opposition to a grand jury’s decision to not indict the police officer who killed Eric Garner.
Hundreds have taken to social media to say that de Blasio has ‘blood on his hands’ and should ‘be charged with murder’ after the two men were killed ‘execution style’ in Brooklyn.
What’s more, many feel that de Blasio should not attend the officers’ funerals, this after many members of the NYPD signed a petition asking that the Mayor not attend their service should they be killed in the line of duty in light of his recent actions.

This as hundreds of NYPD members turned their backs on de Blasio as he entered a news conference Saturday afternoon.”

“Former New York City Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik told Newsmax: ‘De Blasio, Sharpton and all those who encouraged this anti-cop, racist mentality all have blood on their hands.'”

“New York State Assemblywoman Nicole Malliotakis said in a statement: ‘It is well past the time for our mayor and citywide leaders to call for a return to order in our streets, and take a hard stance that that lawlessness and aggression towards police officers will not be tolerated.

‘Extreme anti-police sentiment and public unruliness have been permitted to fester for far too long.’

A petition for de Blasio’s resignation has already amassed more than 5,000 signatures.

Harry Houck, a retired NYPD detective, went on CNN to attack both de Blasio and Al Sharpton.

‘I guess Al Sharpton got what he wanted,’ said Houck of the civil rights leader.
Houck then attacked the Mayor for not supporting the leadership in the police department, saying that he should not show up at the funeral or these two officers.

Furthermore, he said Saturday’s killings were inevitable as the protesters wanted to ‘take out a cop for Eric Garner.’


Klevius question to BBC's Saudi raised muslim sharia presenter Mishail Husain:


How come that BBC hasn't mentioned anything of the above nor that he was a muslim?

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo all have Human Rights violating sharia islam in common

Although islam is evil beyond belief it's also the perfect tool for agitation and political power. By forbidding islam much human suffering and Human Rights violations would be avoided. There is no future for sharia islam anyway simply because the equality logic in Human Rights will always win when people are just educated about it instead of being given "diversity training"  - so why letting even more blood flow on your hands?!

Thursday, December 18, 2014

Rapetivism, the female patriarchy and Human Rights violating islam


What's the difference between Sir Jimmy Savile and Bill Cosby?


And what's going on right now?









However, the worst rapetivism ideology is islam - is this why Human Rights violating islam (the by far worst ideological crime history knows about) is so popular among certain people? Not to mention the female muslim patriarchy.

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain (BBC's sharia presenter) and Michael Adebolajo all have islam and its Human Rights violating sharia in common


Klevius wrote


Tuesday, October 23, 2012

In Klevius series Sex Tutorials: The "culture and praxis" of pedophilia/sexual abuse in BBC and islam



Aeneas (ICLA – International Civil Liberties Alliance): "The BBC interviewer made excuse after excuse for Islam in response to Hirsi Ali’s cogent an analysis.  It seems that the agents of the BBC simply believe the taqiyya that they are fed by the Muslim establishment and take it at face value.  Perhaps the BBC needs to encourage its journalists to read up on the subject from all sides and stop accepting dogmatic nonsense.  The sort of naiveté that we witness at the BBC is the same sort that allowed the rise of Hitler and was the principle cause of World War II and the destruction and despair that ensued."

Klevius comment: No, it's not "naiveté " but deliberate misinformation to protect OIC! UK's leading islamofascist (i.e. supporter of Human Rights violating Sharia) Sayeeda Warsi is the "minister of faith (i.e. islam)" who represents UK before the Saudi based islamofascist muslim world organization OIC and its Fuhrer Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu which want to criminalize scrutiny/criticism or whatever that isn't in accordance with Sharia. And you, don't let anyone confuse you with talk about so called positive Human Rights (the Stalin "rights") that can be abandoned. What is at stake is the basis of all Human Rights i.e. what is called the "negative" (i.e. lack of imposition, or call it freedom if you like) true Human Rights!

Patriarchal pedophilia/sexual abuse and sex apartheid


As you dear reader know by now Klevius has for a decade boosted being the net's foremost expert on sex segregation/apartheid and that he consequently also is the only one seriously addressing the root cause of continuing islamofascism against Human Rights. Yes, it's sad but still. Although the holy Human Rights declaration (unlike Sharia) clearly states that a person's sex should not inflict on her freedom and equality, many still continue living in the sex apartheid past hence offering a dangerous cultural interface welcoming islamofascism.


BBC's Jimmy Savile was only a tiny part of the tip of an enormous embarrassing melting iceberg - actually the same as islam rests its foundation on!

Thousands of Brits honored Jimmy Savile, "the friend of all" on his posh funeral in a golden coffin.

Text on the headstone (now removed from Savile's grave and used as landfill):

 
"The first guy who presented back in 1964 the very first TOTP (Top of the Pop's) and went on to do much more.

There was nothing he didn't do.

as he crossed the country each person was his friend.

Knighted by our Queen he was and knighted by the Pope."

"It Was Good While It Lasted"

Paul Harris (DailyMail):



  • In the homily it was said Sir Jimmy can face eternal life with confidence
  • Thousands of mourners line the streets as 700 people pack the cathedral
  • Sharia supporting New York Times gets Sharia supporting pedophile-BBC's former leader


    Mark Thompson, BBC, is set to become the New York Times new president and chief executive. How much did he and others know? And why has BBC been so silent about muslim jihadist pedophiles committing hate crimes against white children while boosting islamofascism (e.g. Saudi based OIC and its Human Rights violating world-Sharia) to an extent that brakes all limits.




    Compare the above to this report from California, US 


    A "Fantasy Slut League" has been uncovered at Piedmont High School in California. According to Principal Rich Kitchens, the league was created by varsity student athletes. Female students are "drafted" and male students earn points for "documented engagement in sexual activities" with female students. Many students participated because they felt pressured to: "Participation often involved pressure/manipulation by older students that included alcohol to impair judgment/control and social demands to be popular, feel included and attractive to upperclassmen," Kitchens wrote. Students also recognized misconduct, admitting fear of disciplinary action against them if discovered, affecting college applications.


    Klevius comment: The disastrous combination of heterosexual attraction and sex segregation/apartheid leads to perverted social interaction (read What's sex segregation to get rid of your sexual ignorance).

    here's what Klevius wrote

    Saturday, September 27, 2008


    Heterosexual attraction and sex segregation in islam

    Quote of the day (Edmondo de Amicis visiting islamic Morocco some 100 yrs ago): "She appeared sad. Perhaps the reason was that her husband's fourth wife, a recently arrived young 14 yr old girl in his harem, had triumphed over her in a way that was clearly reflected in her husband's indifference." Klevius comment: Heterosexual attraction (HSA) combined with sex segregation is often disastrous for human relations! Only with full access to respective social spheres, as well as full awareness of the HSA discrepancy between the sexes (i.e. what möst feminists deny) an open de-sex segregated interaction is possible' HSA per se doesn't presupposes/determines sex of any kind - neither does women "need a normal penis several times" (S. Freud) nor does a male need to rape. What could the older wife possibly offer her husband behind an impenetrable wall of sex segregation when her physical attraction didn't work anymore? Only islam was satisfied because she had to continue her inescapable (Sharia & apostasy ban) fate of fostering new islamists!


    Klevius question: Was News of the World about to reveal BBC's pedophilia history and culture, or how can we explain BBC's overkill in their efforts to drown the world with negative Murdoch "news" and unfounded allegations about Milly Dowler's phone being erased, hour after hour, day after day, month after month (while leaving muslim pedophile rings attacking vulnerable children in "care homes" etc unreported)? And how much did the bSKYb bid affect it? Or were they intertwined?

    Wednesday, December 17, 2014

    Pakistan PM: There are no "good" Taliban anymore! Klevius: What about "good" islam?!




    Pakistan needs to get rid of islamofascism but can not do so before it gets rid of the blasphemy laws protecting islam

    Did you hear that Mishal Husain, BBC's sharia presenter with a background in Pakistan and Saudi Arabia? Or hasn't islam caused enough blood bath and suffering as yet!


    Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain (BBC's sharia presenter) and Michael Adebolajo all have islam and its Human Rights violating sharia in common

    Muhammad Umar Khorasani, Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP): "We selected the army's school for the attack because the government is targeting our families and females. We want them to feel the pain."

    However, Pakistan's Saudi steered and supported military and Inter-Services Intelligence agency (ISI), is accused of actually nurturing, training, supporting and equipping the Taliban movement behind the school slaughter.

    Bruce Riedel, Brookings Intelligence project: "ISI, has been providing the Taliban with safe haven and sanctuary in Pakistan for over a decade. The ISI participates directly in planning Taliban operations and target selection against Nato and Afghan targets. It helps arm and fund the Taliban and assists its fundraising efforts in the Gulf states."

    Richard Dawkins: Very few faith-heads are as evil as Taliban or IS. Yet what else but faith is CAPABLE of making people do such evil? Mental illness can drive a lone nutter to it. But an organised group needs an extreme motivation – faith, in something like a god or nazism.





     What Klevius wrote about a Taliban

    Saturday, June 19, 2010

    Islam's true evil face(s) & dirty feet

    The nice face of islam (a smiling muslim American, Faisal Shahzad, who is planning to murder as many people as possible for the sake of islam

    and the true face of islam


    and a muslim footballer (Nicolas Anelka) who calls his non-muslim (infidel) coach "a dirty (non-muslim) son of a whore"

    Another muslim footballer, Zinedine Zidane, made a fool of himself in the 2006 World Cup, due to a similar but milder expression. Btw, according to charlatan Wikipedia, Zinedine Zidane is a muslim, but does not practice it. I.e. much like Mr X "president"! However, what has been a trade mark for muslimhood throughout 1400 yrs is the spreading of social cancer, i.e. the very opposite to the argument from godism people that "religion" can contribute with anything good for the society! It can't, precisely because it always tries to segregate itself from the only possible social basis, the Holy Negative Human Rights!

    Klevius comment: These morons share the same ignorance abt islam as, for example, Bernard Lewis, whose belittling & glorifying of islamic slavery only compete with his complete lack of insight in the basic problem, sex segregation/rapetivism. It's like girls/women don't even really exist in Bernard Lewis' twisted historical mind.

    Another example of schizoid thinking abt islam: Richard Francis Burton and David Livingstone were two British 19th Century explorers who reported two extremely different realities abt islam. While Burton wrapped it in naive "spiritualism" Livingstone, Britain's (Scotland's) foremost anti-slavery campaigner, saw islam's horrendous slavery traces in the East African Nile river land (Tutsi/Hutu land, Idi Amin land, Ujiji land, etc if you like).

    The origin of evil islam (the worst ideological crime ever against humanity) lays in the Judaic slave trade interface during the Sassanian era. It's too complicated for a short single blogpost to explain but this framework then constituted the perfect opening for evil islam in the form of a looting sex slave jihadism, i.e. what muslims call the perfect example of Mohammed. However, due to the greatness* of islam's evilness it's almost impossible for most people to swallow, so they rather shoot the truth messenger than the murderous one!

    * The "greatness" of islam's evilness is directly connected to its original popularity. Sex & booty jihad combined with institutionalized rapetivism in a Sharia dead end (apostasy ban) made for rapid growth of the muslim population. So 1.5 Billion "muslims" don't prove islam's goodness but rather its evilness.


    The French World Cup team has deteriorated at abt the same pace as it has been muslimified
    Ever thought abt why most players in the French team are blacks/muslims, when 90% of the French population is white non-muslim, and, moreover, when the majority of the best football players in European countries are white, and when the absolute elite players of the world are predominantly "white" (no, Klevius is no racist but a logician - if you have read your Klevius you know his sites/blogs are all abt getting rid of racist/sexist segregation)?!

    Football is possibly the easiest sport to get into without financial support. Consequently most young footballers in the world are non-whites. But despite this fact the best players tend to be predominantly "whites". But saying this is considered racist while saying that the best black athletes (actually only some of the blacks rooted in West Africa - East African blacks are lousy sprinters) run faster (on shorter distances & straight forward - which car do you think perform better on a rally track, a stupid heavy costly non-greenish Veyron or a smart light inexpensive relatively greenish Subaru?) than the best "whites", is totally ok!?


    Islam is a horrendous insult against every citizen (incl. muslims) in the free world! Only problem being you need to open your eyes & admit reality!

    Islamic mosques, minarets, veils, customs etc. are insensitive reminders of the worst crime ever against humanity. It's offensive to non-muslims, including many from Arab countries. They see islam as launching a brutal "holy" war against non-muslims.

    Tuesday, December 16, 2014

    Muslim stupidity behind islam's misogyny


    Klevius, the world's foremost expert on sex segregation (sad isn't it), sex tutorial for muslims and their accomplices in their crimes against Human Rights





    Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain (BBC's sharia presenter) and Michael Adebolajo all have islam and its Human Rights violating sharia in common




    onislam.net (a deceptive but popular A/Q site for naive/ignorant people): By covering herself, a Muslim woman declares that she is equal to man and has brains. She closes the door to being seen as “a piece of meat”.

    Klevius: Really! Muslim women have brains! A muslim brain, is it? However, Klevius has always enjoyed seeing his infidel girlfriends and wives as heterosexually attractive (i.e. what muslims see as “a piece of meat”). However, unlike all true muslims (defined according to onislam.net) and many sexist non-muslims as well, Klevius has always seen women as equal to himself - even while appreciating their heterosexual attraction and during sexual acts. This approach seems to be radically different from muslim sex predators who, following the Koran and onislam.net etc., see "infidel" girls/women as sex slaves 'their right hand possesses'. In other words, whereas muslim women just belong to an inferior "race" in need of male dictators, non-muslim women are considered even lower than that. Klevius approach, however, goes in the very opposite direction and makes it possible for him to encounter, on an equal basis women with or without heterosexual attraction! Klevius is the opposite to Casanova or Don Juan and has never ever seduced a woman - and he is extremely proud about it. Why should he even try to lure her into something and consequently loose the human virginity in the relation?! And how could one fully enjoy a relation with a woman if there are mutual "no go zones" - not to mention restrictions laid on her? And what if the woman isn't interested in heterosex or sex at all? The fact that Klevius might appreciate the look of a woman's body doesn't make him believe the woman wants it. And although Klevius has nothing to say about voyeurism emanating from women themselves, he completely disapprove of peeping Tom. Likewise Klevius can not comprehend how anyone could be aroused by seeing a naked woman who isn't herself aware and positive to it. Klevius files such perversions under necrophilia. 

    onislam.net: As for women praying behind men, it is not, my dear (sic), because they are inferior. Muslim prayers involve bowing and prostrating. If women were next to or in front of men, their movements would be distracting. It is again, to keep their chastity and avoid focusing on their bodily existence.

    Klevius: Poor muslim men. They seem to be real extremists. Although Klevius would love to be unique, facts seem to prove him "extremely"* normal". Unlike muslims, the majority of civilized men have no problem seeing female bodies without connecting it to sex or sexism, not to mention rape etc. Where Klevius differs from many other civilized men is only when it comes to sex segregation, i.e. the prevalent but so problematic confusion produced by mixing heterosexual attraction with the human person. And in this both men and women have been guilty of upholding a perverted view on each other. This is also why Klevius always refers to the (negative) Human Rights declaration from 1948 which clearly states that one's sex ought not to infringe on one's Human Rights - as it does in islam and which caused OIC (all muslims Saudi based and Saudi steered world Umma organization) to abandon Human Rights and replace them with misogynist sharia.

    * Among 1.5+ Billion muslims and another 1.5+ Billion naively/ignorant (or purely evil) muslim supporters, Klevius normality has to be underscored in the same way as his normality in defending Human Rights isn't "extremism" but extremely important today.
    onislam.net: In Islam, the husband is responsible for all the expenses of the household. Then, in return, the wife is to guard his property and her chastity in his absence. She is to obey him in things regarding their life together.

    Klevius: An imprisoned whore!

    onislam.net: A Muslim husband has the right to order his non-Muslim wife not to serve pork or alcohol in the house. Yet, he is also responsible not to offend her creed or prohibit her from her given right of worshiping, according to her Christian or Jewish faith.

    Klevius: Only Christian or Jewish faith? What about people outside the book, i.e. the majority of the world's population? And is she allowed to eat pork? More to the point, Klevius would hate to be a family dictator. Why? Because Klevius believes in democracy. Which fact doesn't exclude criticism of bad decisions/opinions. And the best way to criticize is to highlight possible drawbacks and let her balance them just as she would do against his. I.e. that kind of criticism that isn't allowed against islam!

    onislam.net: But, if a Muslim woman were to marry a non-Muslim man and he ordered her to serve pork or alcohol, what would she do? What if he ordered her not to pray or fast?

    Klevius: She doesn't have to eat it, does she, precisely because he is a non-muslim. Or should we interpret it as muslim women aren't allowed to even touch wine bottles or pork packages etc. Islam is a laughably rigid system of restrictions and impositions. And a civilized non-muslim man would probably not "order" a woman at all. Only in the worst ever ideological hate crime is it today possible to even hint at such stupidities.

    onislam.net: A Muslim wife is originally obliged to obey her husband, in order to maintain peace and love with the family relations. Yet, off course a woman should obey Allah first. So, if there is conflict between the husband’s demands and Allah’s orders, it puts a great strain on the marriage. Thus, Islam prohibits a Muslim woman from marrying a non-Muslim man.

    Klevius: Not at all. The will of "Allah" is completely deleted in islam. The real reason is that the kids should become muslims. And this extreme one way immoral is perhaps the most striking feature of islam compared to civilized Human Rights thinking.


    onislam.net: Even if a non-Muslim wife doesn't respect Islam the Muslim husband has the right to demand certain behavior from her.

    Klevius: "Certain behavior" like domestic sex slavery and responsibility to foster her kids to muslim jihadis and not according to her own beliefs.

    onislam.net: Men and women do not have the same responsibilities and rights in Islam. For example, the wife has the right to  stay home and care for her young children. She can instill the best values in them. She can build a strong family… and strong families build strong healthy societies.

    Klevius: Healthy societies?! The majority of the most unhealthy societies are and have always been muslim caliphates, nations or muslim communities! No matter if a muslim nation is rich due to slavery or Western oil money, or poor when this is lacking - the result is always unhealthy societies!


    Iyad Madani, the Saudi dictator family's islamofascist leader of the world's muslims most important organization OIC.


    Saturday, December 13, 2014

    The Lucia (light) Day in Finland - a reminder of Christian crusades and islamic jihad

      Peter Klevius, a proud Finland-Swede, proudly presents the

    Finland-Swedish Lucia of 2014




    St. Lucy’s (Lucia)* Day on 13 December, is a Nordic light feast which by far predates the introduction of Christianity, and is celebrated in Scandinavia, with their long dark winters, where it is a major feast and charity day, especially in Finland and among the Finland-Swedes. A girl/young woman dressed in a white dress and a red sash (as the symbol of martyrdom - also hinting at "pagan" martyrs during the bloody Christian crusades in Finland) wears a crown of candles on her head.

    The Finnish celebration is historically tied to the Finland-Swedes (Swedish-speaking Finns who usually also master Finnish - for a background see Bilingual Goths and Vikings). Finland-Swedes like Klevius hence stand on both an Uralic as well as an Indo-European linguistic foot. And if you ask Klevius he will argue that the two feet go together if you follow their linguistic legs long enough.

    The Luciadagen (Lucia day) is celebrated on what was previously thought as being the correct Winter Solstice. It is celebrated as a “beacon of brightness” in the darkest time of the year. The Lucia of Finland has been elected since 1949 with candidates presented in Hufvudstadsbladet, the main Swedish newspaper in Finland. She is crowned in the Helsinki Cathedral. Local Lucias are elected in almost every place where there is a Swedish populace in Finland. The Finnish-speaking population has also lately begun to embrace Luciadagen.

    * It was during the Christian era Finland adopted this name for the pre-Christian feast. However, the feast has very little to do with Christianity even now.



    Helsingfors (Helsinki) Cathedral

    Helsingfors is named after a Viking called Helsing. 'Fors' means torrent/waterfall and is a very old word but applied later to Helsinge. 'Helsinki' is a Finnish form from 1819 but is based on the original name Helsinge which in turn ought to be considered in the context of Hälsingland in what is now Sweden but what used to be Finnish and Old Nordic speaking ("Finland-Swedes" of the time) Kvenland before the North-Germanic farmers had taken over most of it after the Viking age. Also, do note that Norway and Norwegian hadn't been invented as yet - only the 'Northern Way'. Old Nordic was clearly affected by Finnish which fact is quite natural in the light of Klevius' bi-lingual explanation to why the Viking age started in the Finnish speaking east long before it went to the west. As a consequence we have a line of Finnish affected languages from Norway to Iceland.



    Educate yourself on Goths, Kvenland and Vikings












    The first version at the top made 1583 and below how it looks today.
    The sword held over the lion's head represents the West whereas the one below the lion represents islam (via Khazars, Bolgars, Ottomans etc. - see text below).





    Finland/Kvenland - the home of Kalevala and the Vikings

    Background 


    Finland has two official languages, Swedish and Finnish. Finland is also one of the most secularized countries in the world. Finland (and huge parts of what is now Sweden and Norway) was Kvenland before the Christian crusades after which it became connected as part of Sweden for some 600 years until the 1808-9 war against Russia after which Finland became an autonomous Grand Duchy in the Russian Empire until Finland's independence 6, December 1917.

    After the 1808-9 war the Swedish speaking intellectuals started a campaign, "we are no Swedes anymore, and we don't wanna be Russians - so let's be Finns". This strive made many a Finland-Swede translate their name into Finnish. It also resulted in the collection of the Kalevala epos (which Tolkien used as a basis for his stories). However, Elias Lönnroth's Kalevala was heavily influenced by a monotheist understanding. Luckily Juha Pentikäinen and others have now initiated a rewriting of the text clean from Christian monotheist influences.

    Due to its location Finnish (and Saami) possesses extremely old words still in use (see below). And due to the interaction between old Nordic and Finnish a pattern emerged that can still be seen stretching from Finland all the way to Iceland (see below). 

    No one knows the true origin of the name Kvenland. However, Klevius qualified guess is based on its history of Nordic (and Finnish) speaking (agrarian) coastal Finns robbing beautiful girls with mongoloid characteristics (which pattern you can also trace in reading Kalevala) from its Saami and Finnish speaking neighbors. Raids with light boats was a Finnish specialty inherited from the Finnish and Russian water ways they still frequented (see Origin of Vikings). And when they heard (from the Volga Bolgars and the Jewish Khazars etc) about the enormous demand and price the muslim caliphate paid for these kind of girls the commerce quickly changed from furs to walking girls.

    Due to the mix of old Nordic speaking males and Finnish speaking women an early bilingual traditon was born, which helped dealing with both Swedes and Finnish speaking "Russians". At the beginning of the Viking age the "Russians" spoke Finnish which was the main language in what is now northern and mid Russia. This also explains how Fornjotur could be the King of both Finland and Gotland as well as how Rus could become so friendly with the pre-Russians that they asked him for protection against other Vikings, Jews (Khazars) etc. 

    Finland has for long suffered from what Klevius calls a mongoloid complex (2003). In 1952, only seven years after the end of Finland's disastrous connection with Germany in the World War 2, apart from having its first Olympics the nation celebrated the 17-year old Armi Kuusela's victory in the Miss Universe "beauty" contest, thus finally releasing the Finns from what was considered a traumatic connection with the East and its Russian/mongoloid inhabitants.


    Klevius' ethnicity


    The tiny (some 300,000) Finland-Swedish ethnic minority has, apart from the tiresome, bragging and annoying islamophobe named Klevius, produced such names as Edith Södergran (modernist poet), Westermarck (anthropology), Jean Sibelius (music), Georg Henrik von Wright (Wittgenstein's successor), Lasse Wiren (athletics - double-double Olympic winner on 5,000m and 10,000m), Lindberg (music - Kraft etc), Linus Thorvald (Linux), etc etc.

    This list clearly implies a Finland-Swedish complex or something (see Inside Klevius mind).


    Why surprised about the fact that English is a Nordic language? Klevius has informed about it for almost a decade on the web!


    * When Klevius shakes hand with native English speakers he loves to point out that 'finger', 'hand', and 'arm' all are Swedish words with exactly the same spelling and not too different pronunciation. This usually produces a nice "really". However, when he also points out that most of the non-Latin words in English also are Swedish a brief uncertain and incredulous retreat from the topic is noticeable. And, now finally the self-evident fact that even grammar is equal has been pointed out even by others.

    English is a Scandinavian/Nordic (Fennoscandian*) language


    * No one knows for how long Old Swedish/Nordic language(s) has been spoken in Finland. This is why not only the Scandinavian part but the whole Fennoscandian peninsula ought to be included.


    Jan Terje Faarlund, professor of linguistics at the University of Oslo. "Obviously there are many English words that resemble ours. But there is something more: its fundamental structure is strikingly similar to Norwegian.

    Klevius (who understands all Nordic languages incl. Finnish and most dialects): Norwegian language emerged after the Viking period (see Origin of Vikings). Its predecessor, i.e. what is called "Old Norse" but perhaps rather should be called Old Swedish or Old Nordic, is rooted in Kvenland from the cross pollination of Finnish and Nordic Germanic. Kvenish today is still very close to Finnish (more so than e.g. Estonian) yet it also contains such pecularities as meiðän ('our') which is simply meidän in Standard Finnish with a normally sounding d instead of the English sounding ð.


    Kvenland (Womanland) from Finno-Ugric/Uralic to Old Swedish/Scandinavian/Nordic*


    *aka "Old Norse" which might lead associations to Norway although there were no Norwegian speakers around long after the Viking age (see Origin of Vikings).

    Kvenland, aka Cwenland, Kænland, Queenland, Kvinnoland, Womanland etc, is an ancient name for an area in Fennoscandia. Compare Swedish 'Kvinna' (woman) and English 'Queen' as well as Norwegian 'kone' (woman) Swedish 'kön' (sex) and English 'kin' (yes, we have Indoeuropean 'gen' but so what, where did 'gen' emerge?).

    There exists a persistent "wikimyth" that Finnish language in Sweden and Norway are just a few hundred years old when in fact it's thousands of years old but due to national romanticism was explained away as caused by late immigration only.

    As I already said, no one knows for sure why it was called Kvenland. However, a strong hypothesis is that the name reflects sex-slave hunt for beautiful white girls/women who were most valued on the muslim slave markets by the islamic mosques. So the Finnish empire may have existed long before it was called Kvenland.The name was just applied from the outside as a marker of its notorious records.

    Kvenland appears in written sourdes from  the 9th century, and from Icelandic sources written in the 12th and 13th centuries. Since the 17th century most historians have located Kvenland somewhere around or near the Bothnian Bay, in the present-day regions of Swedish Norrbotten and Finnish Ostrobothnia as well as part of Norway where there are still a Kvenish population. The traditional East Finnish name of this area was Kainuu, and it has been suggested that the Scandinavian name of Kvenland and Kainuu share etymological roots.


    Around 890 CE a Northman named Ohthere visited King Alfred of Wessex who had his stories written down by Orosius.

    According to Ohthere, the Norðmanna land was very long and very narrow ... and to the east are wild mountains, parallel to the cultivated land. Finnas inhabit these mountains ... Then along this land southwards, on the other side of the mountain, is Sweden ... and along that land northwards, Kvenland (Cwenaland). The Kvens (Cwenas) sometimes make depredations on the Northmen over the mountain, and sometimes the Northmen on them.
    There are large [freshwater] meres amongst the mountains,[2] and the Kvens carry their ships over land into the meres, and thence make depredations on the Northmen; they have small and very light ships.








    Fornjotur* (ca 160-250 CE), the Finnish King of Kvenland and Gotland, and ancestor of the Swedish Ynglinga tree and William I of England

    * there is much reason to believe that the legend about Fornjotur has more truth underneath than for example the myth about Mohammed (who was allegedly born 400 years later). Hugh Kennedy (professor of Arabic language and Arabic history): "Before Abd al-Malik (caliph 685-705) Mohammed (dead 632) is never mentioned on any official document whatsoever..."


    Fornjotur, Fornjót, Fornjótr) was a king of Finland. His children are Ægir (the ruler of the sea), Logi (fire giant) and Kári (god of wind).
    The name has often been interpreted as forn-jótr "ancient giant", and sometimes identified with the primeval giant Ymir. But it is also possible, as was suggested by Müller (1818), that it is one of a well-established group of names or titles of gods in -njótr "user, owner, possessor", which would make Fornjótr the "original owner".



    How did primary stress on first syllable come from Kvenland to Iceland?



    There was of course another language, Kvenish-Finnish, that was present in Fennoscandia and somehow influenced the ancient Norse language.

    Finnish possesses some of the oldest words in the world, some of them still in their original Uralic form. In fact, the old Finnish stem seems to be closer to its distant roots than other Finno-Ugric languages despite the fact that Finland has been the most modernized of them all.


    Klevius linguistic question: How was the strange affinity between Indoeuropean Icelandic and Uralic Finnish created between Kvenland and Iceland?


    Whereas Indoeuropean languages are strongly rooted in a Neolithic agricultural past Uralic languages are rooted in hunting/gathering societies i.e. pre-Neolithic.

    Indoeuropean Old Norse developed into "Western" and "Eastern" variants. Western Norse covered Norway and overseas settlements in Iceland, Greenland, the Faroe Islands and the Shetland Islands, while Eastern Norse developed in Denmark and south-central Sweden and coastal Finland.

    The language of Iceland and the non Finnish or Saami Fennoscandia was practically the same up until the 14th century, when they started to deviate from each other.

    During the late Old Norse period and this period there was also a considerable adoption of Middle Low German vocabulary. Similar development in grammar and phonology happened in Swedish and Danish, keeping the dialect continuum in continental Scandinavia intact, but with greater dialectal variation. This process did not, however, occur in the same way in Faroese and Icelandic. These languages remain conservative to this day, when it comes to grammar and vocabulary, so mutual intelligibility with continental Scandinavia was lost.




    The Uralic languages belong to a single Eurasian belt of agglutinative languages together with the Altaic languages streching from Fennoscandia in the west to Japan in the east


    Not only typological parallelism, but also stress on the first syllable as well as lack of third person pronoun sex segregation (e.g. Finnish 'hän' instead of 'he/she' apartheid) is accompanied by areal adjacency, allowing us to speak of a distinct Ural-Altaic language area and language type we may call Eurasiatic.

    Some roots for Eurasiatic: mi (what?, mi/kä or mi/tä in modern Finnish), pälä (two), akʷā (water), tik (one or finger), konV (arm 1), bhāghu(s) (arm 2), bük(ä) (bend or knee), punče (hair), p'ut'V (vagina or vulva), snā (smell or nose), kamu (seize or squeeze), and parV (the verb to fly)

    Modern Finnish preserves old words equal or almost equal more often than other languages

    Examples of reconstructed Proto-Uralic words:

    Body parts and bodily functions: *ïpti hair on the head, *ojwa head, *śilmä eye (same as in modern Finnish), *poski cheek (same as in modern Finnish), *kä(x)li tongue ('kieli' in modern Finnish), *elä- to live ('elää' in modern Finnish), *ka(x)li- to die ('kuolla', and 'kuoli' in imperf), *wajŋi breath (in Finnish 'vainaja' means a dead), *kosi cough, *kunśi urine ('kusi' in modern Finnish), *küńili tear ('kyynele' in modern Finnish), *se(x)ji pus.

    Kinship terms: *emä mother (same in modern Finnish), *čečä uncle ('setä' in modern Finnish), *koska aunt, *mińä daughter-in-law ('miniä' in modern Finnish), *wäŋiw son-in-law ('vävy' in modern Finnish).

    Verbs for universally known actions: *meni- to go ('mennä', 'meni' in imperf in modern Finnish), *toli- to come ('tulla', 'tuli' in imperf in modern Finnish), *aśkili- to step ('askel' is step in modern Finnish), *imi- to suck ('imi' is sucked in modern Finnish), *soski- to chew, *pala- to eat up ('pala' is a piece in modern Finnish), *uji- to swim ('ui' is swim in imperf in modern Finnish), *sala- to steal ('salata' means to hide in modern Finnish), *kupsa- to extinguish ('kupsata' used for to die in modern Finnish).

    Basic objects and concepts of the natural world: *juka river ('joki' in modern Finnish), *toxi lake, *weti water ('vesi/vettä' in modern Finnish), *päjwä sun (same but also day in modern Finnish), warmth, *suŋi summer ('suvi' in modern Finnish), *śala- lightning ('salama' in modern Finnish), *wanča root ('vanka', 'vankka' means steady in modern Finnish), *ko(x)ji birch, *ka(x)si spruce ('kuusi' in modern Finnish), *sïksi Siberian pine, *δ'ï(x)mi bird cherry

    Elementary technology: *tuli fire (same in modern Finnish), *śüδi coal, *äjmä needle, *pura drill ('pora' in modern Finnish), *jïŋsi bow ('jousi' in modern Finnish), *jänti bow string, *ńï(x)li arrow ('nuoli' in modern Finnish), *δ'ümä glue ('liima' in modern Finnish), *lïpśi cradle, *piksi rope, *suksi ski (same in modern Finnish), *woča fence.

    Basic spatial concepts: *ïla below ('alla' in modern Finnish), *üli above ('yli' in modern Finnish), *wasa left ('vasen' in modern Finnish), *pälä side.

    Pronouns: *mun I (meaning mine in modern Finnish), *tun you ('sun' meaning yours in modern Finnish), *ke- who (same in modern Finnish), *mi- what (same in modern Finnish).

    The reconstructed vocabulary is compatible with a Mesolithic culture (bow, arrow, needle, sinew, but also rope, fence, cradle, ski), a north Eurasian landscape (spruce, birch, Siberian pine), and contains interesting hints on kinship structure.



    The Vikings were bilingual (Finland-Swedes) Goths who could communicate both with the Finnish tribes as well as with the old Nordic/German people



    In the Viking world the Jewish slave empire (Chazaria) played an important role in establishing the slave raid and trade system that served the enormous islamic hunger for white sex slaves.





    Karelia's old coat of arms.



    Karelia bordered the medieval Novgorod republic which was ransacked by muslim Bolgars who hunted for slaves. The southern part became an important hub in the islamic slave finance as Vikings and Kazar Jews etc served the islaic caliphate in the south and later on the Ottoman Turks.


    Fair skinned female sex slaves from northern Europe were the by far most valuable according to islamic price lists

    (see more about this here)



    Most of what you read about Vikings on the web is wrong. The Viking age started already before 750 in the east (because of islamic demand for sex slaves). So forget about Britain 786. Also remember that if you see the words Norway or Norwegians mentioned re. Vikings then throw the link/book away. There was no Norway or Norwegians or a Norwegian language during the Viking age! Educate yourself on Origin of the Vikings.

    In 882, Rurik's successor, Oleg of Novgorod, conquered Kiev and founded the state of Kievan Rus.




    After the Kievan Russian state began to disintegrate in 1132, slaves became much more numerous as inhabitants of neighboring East Slavic principalities (much of the territory between Poland-Lithuania and the Volga River) became fair game for enslavement.

    Jewish merchants took East Slavic slaves from Novgorod to western destinations. Other East Slavic slaves were continuously "harvested" by the Turkic peoples (Tatars) inhabiting the southern and eastern frontiers of Rus' and subsequently sold to buyers mainly in the Arab countries.

    The Mongol invasions into Rus' from 1236-1240 accelerated the disintegration of Kievan Rus' that had commenced in 1132.

    Continuous Tatar slave raids replaced those of the pre-1240 Turkic peoples who had roamed the Ukranian steppe. In these centuries the word "slave" was borrowed from the ethnonym "Slav."

    During the ensuing period of the "Tatar yoke" (1237-1480), the export of slaves through Novgorod continued and the Novgorodian slave market at the intersection of Slave and High Streets was the most active business locale in the entire Republic of Novgorod, which encompassed much of Russia north of the Volga to the White Sea.


    The Crimean Tatars had converted to islam in the 1300s and in 1475 the Crimean Khanate became a protectorate of the Ottoman Empire while itself still clinging to power over the Duchy of Muscovy.  In 1480, the Muscovites threw off the "Tatar Yoke" and began the unification of Russia under Slavic rulers.  By 1503, those rulers would declare Russia the Third Roman Empire, and take the title of Tsar.

    The Crimean Tatars made use of their strategic position between the Ottomans and the Russians and supplied slaves for the Ottoman Janissary corps from the neighboring peoples to an enormous extent yet to be fully mapped.