Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?

Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?

First UK people voted to join and share borders with EU. Then England voted to leave while Scotland and Northern Ireland voted to stay. And now UK politicians want to leave while keeping the Irish EU border open. UK lacks a modern constitution according to which a constitutional issue has to pass at least two majority votes.

Rabbi Sacks: "BBC runs Britain." Klevius: Pro-sharia BBC meddles worldwide.

Rabbi Sacks: "BBC runs Britain." Klevius: Pro-sharia BBC meddles worldwide.

Klevius CV

Are you or your representative(s) for or against basic Human Rights equality?

Peter Klevius global morality can only be challenged by violating the most basic of Human Rights.

Everything Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist. anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of 1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called "negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the 1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".

* This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex, religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights. The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an "islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to "security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.

This is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as "islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g. "islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.

Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.

Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is super intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):

* The son of one of Sweden's best chess-players and an even more intelligent Finnish mother. He was mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgensteins's successor at Cambridge. However, G H v Wright sadly didn't fully realize back then (1991) the true power of the last chapter, Khoi, San and Bantu, in Klevius book. Today, if still alive, he would surely see it.

1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.

2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).

3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.

4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).

Peter Klevius "islamophobia"/Human Rightsphobia test for you and your politicians

Racist UK Government and BBC

Racist UK Government and BBC

Warning for a muslim robot!

UK PM candidate Rees-Mogg: Germans needed Human Rights - we don't. Klevius: I really think you do.

TheresaMay's racist robbing of EU citizens' Human Rights

The Saudi Fuhrer of Saudi based islamofascist OIC

BBC's compulsory fee funded propaganda for Saudi sharia islam

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Sayeeda Warsi like all sharia muslims is against basic Human Rights

Theresa May is for sharia and EU - but against EU's Human Rights Court which condemns sharia

Klevius is probably now the world's foremost expert on sex segregation (sad isn't it), and islam (the worst cime ever) is the foremost expression of sex segregation. By 'islam' Klevius means the same as true sharia supporting (and therefore against the most basic of Human Rights) muslims.

British muslim jihadists: Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo (who murdered Le

Saturday, November 23, 2013

To BBC's islamofascist* Sharia presenter Mishal Husain: Why don't you tell the Brits that islam is against Human Rights?!

* i.e. a person who knowingly supports a totalitarian ideology that is against basic Human Rights

Have you noticed how racist and misogynist anti-Human Rights islam pushes women to represent itself?

Klevius suggestion to BBC's muslim islam propagandist Mishal Husain: Tell the license fee paying Brits about OIC's Cairo declaration and that it considers basic Human Rights (e.g. equal rights for women) a crime against basic Sharia! And Mishal, try to tell the truth about it. Yes, I know, it will hurt many muslims and "muslims". But, as Karin Boye (Swedish author of Callocain, a classic dystopia - well on pair with Huxley and Orwell - criticizing totalitarian ideologies) used to put it: 'Of course it hurts when buds burst'!

Klevius translation of Karin Boye's* poem:

* Karin Boye was born in Gothenburg, Sweden

yes, it hurts when buds burst
why should otherwise the spring hesitate
why should all our passionate longing
be tied to frozen bitter paleness
the envelope, though, was the bud all the winter
what is this new thing that taxes and bursts
yes, it hurts when buds burst,
hurts what grows and what confines

So why is Klevius targeting Mishal Husain? Simply because she represents a threat against the free world far more deceptive than the misled woman above and her bearded islamofanatic pals! Mishal Husain knows very well that Klevius tells the truth about islam, its parasitic origin, its slavery finance, its rapetivism etc - and if she doesn't I'm surprised and will forgive her just like I forgive all other ignorant muslims.

Listen to Mishal Husain's blood thirsty voice by playing this video

Mishal Husain was chosen by BBC allegedly to help adjusting BBC's skewed sex-ratio (not gender ratio - gender means culture*). However, the main reason was without a doubt because she was muslim (and the right sort of muslim of course).

* read Klevius sex and gender tutorial

Klevius comment: So in short, BBC managed to employ a woman who is against basic Human Rights for women while trying to make the public believe it was for equality between the sexes! I 43w5 my case.

Klevius question to Mishal Husain: Is it true that you have forgotten so much about your law studies that you don't realize that islam and Human Rights are each others very opposites and that that's the reason why OIC (all muslims world organization, i.e. islam today) abandoned Human Rights?!

Moreover, when your muslim Pakistani friends in Sheffield now are busy racially profiling Roma people, what do you think Mishal, should we call them with all the same names as we use to call other racial profilers?

Islam's horrifying Indian slave raids/trades:

Then came Islam - slaughter, slavery, rape, violence, pillage; destruction of religious sites, art and architecture; poverty, exploitation, humiliation, famine, forced conversion, decline in intellectual pursuits, social destruction and a worsening of social ills.  To Islam, anything that is not Islamic is from a time of ignorance –Jahiliyya- and must be destroyed (or appropriated and called Islam’s!).  The onslaught created the Roma (gypsies), destroyed ‘Hindu’ Afghanistan and formed Pakistan (Kashmir) and Bangladesh .

The cost of the Muslim invasions is massive in lives, wealth and culture.   Estimates suggest that  60-80 MILLION died at the hands of Muslim invaders and rulers between 1000 and 1525 alone (ie over 500 years-the population FELL).  (Lal cited in Khan p 216)  Impossible you think?   In the war of Independence of Bangladesh, 1971, the Muslim Pakistani army killed 1.5-3 million people (mainly Muslims ...) in just 9 MONTHS. (Khan p 216).  The world looked the other way—but don’t we always when it’s Muslims committing the violence!

Should BBC's presenter of Human Rights violating Sharia'h islamofascism, Mishal Husain be awarded as Britain's most hypocritical bigot*?

When muslims now racially profile and stereotype Roma people in Europe - the people that fled islamic terror and slavery more than thousand years ago - a tragic historical irony about Pakistan appears.

* A bigot is a person who strongly and unfairly dislikes other people, ideas, etc.
Mishal Husain says she's a muslim (how many hundred millions of muslims wouldn't say she's not?) 

Who is the worst hypocrite among muslim women in Britain? I know, it's a tough one. Competition is extremely hard. Just consider, for example, Sayeeda Warsi, minister of islamofascism and Britain's messenger at the Saudi based OIC - all the world's muslim's Sharia (Sharia'h) organization, which has clearly stated, via UN etc (look it up, ignorant) that it considers basic Human Rights a "crime" against islamic Sharia (Sharia'h)!

Apart from Klevius' rock solid islam criticism, here are some other critical voices on OIC's Sharia declaration for the whole world's muslim population. No offense!

The CDHRI has been criticized for being implemented by a set of states with widely disparate religious policies and practices who had "a shared interest in disarming international criticism of their domestic human rights record."

Article 24 of the declaration states: "All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Sharia." Article 19 also says: "There shall be no crime or punishment except as provided for in the Sharia."

The CDHRI has been criticised for failing to guarantee freedom of religion, in particular the right of each and every individual to change their religion, as a "fundamental and nonderogable right".

In a joint written statement submitted by the International Humanist and Ethical Union (IHEU), a non-governmental organization in special consultative status, the Association for World Education (AWE) and the Association of World Citizens (AWC), a number of concerns were raised that the CDHRI limits human rights, religious freedom, and freedom of expression. The statement concludes, "The Cairo Declaration of Human Rights in Islam is clearly an attempt to limit the rights enshrined in the UDHR and the International Covenants. It can in no sense be seen as complementary to the Universal Declaration."

The Centre for Inquiry in September 2008 in an article to the United Nations writes that the CDHRI "undermines equality of persons and freedom of expression and religion by imposing restrictions on nearly every human right based on Islamic Sharia law."

Rhona Smith writes that because the CDHRI's reference to Shariah implies an inherent degree of superiority of men.

Adama Dieng, a member of the International Commission of Jurists, criticised the CDHRI. He argued that the declaration gravely threatens the inter-cultural consensus on which the international human rights instruments are based; that it introduces intolerable discrimination against non-Muslims and women. He further argued that the CDHRI reveals a deliberately restrictive character in regard to certain fundamental rights and freedoms, to the point that certain essential provisions are below the legal standards in effect in a number of Muslim countries; it uses the cover of the "Islamic Shari'a (Law)" to justify the legitimacy of practices, such as corporal punishment, which attack the integrity and dignity of the human being.

Some random reports re. islam (from Pamela Geller's Atlasshrugs - you know, the Jew that wasn't allowed to enter England because UK muslims don't like truthsayers

In the "Stockholm Syndrome," now seen, ironically, in Sweden, victims start bonding with their abusers in the wish that if they share the same values as their abusers, their abusers might stop abusing them. "We must be open and tolerant toward Islam and Muslims because when we become a minority, they will be so toward us." — Jens Orback, former Swedish government minister.

The European Union [EU] is singling out Israel for sanctions. Not only are the officials at the EU failing to boycott other regions that legally count as occupied territories, but they are actively aiding at least one clearly occupying power, Turkey, in the Turkish-occupied northern Cyprus: in 2006, the EU approved a $259 million aid package for the Turkish Cypriot community there. In addition to that double-standard, the EU's High Representative for Foreign Affairs, Catherine Ashton, has revealed noticeable prejudice on multiple occasions, the latest example being when she felt compelled to compare the Toulouse massacre to "what's happening in Gaza," any similarities to which would objectively be hard to come by.

Hamas Threatens Israel with Genocide

You cannot make peace with an adversary that refuses to recognize your existence. You cannot make peace with an adversary whose goal is your annihilation.

You cannot make peace with a devout adversary whose religion demands the annihilation of the Jews.

    [You] Zionists, you have no place on the land of Palestine ... we shall expel you from our land and we will fight against you on it [on the land], we will kill you or expel you from it when you are submissive ... the jihad and the martyrdom in the way of Allah are our road and our track which are meant to fulfill our triumphs and fulfill and protect our [Muslim] nation.

And the world roots for the annihilationists. They loved Hitler, too, until he lost the war.

    "Hamas Threatens Israel with Genocide" INN, November 22, 2013
    Members of Hamas have recently implied that once the balance of power changes, the terror group will commit genocide against Israelis.

Muslim Couple held 3 women slaves in London for 30 years
Where is slavery still rampant and sanctioned? The Muslim world. "Two people accused of enslaving three women for more than 30 years had been on the radar of the authorities since the 1970s when they were arrested by police." "Asian" is UK media-speak for Muslim.

The pair, thought to be Asian and illegal immigrants, were first arrested by the Metropolitan Police almost 40 years ago. They were detained again Thursday morning as part of an investigation into slavery but were released on bail to a date in January after several hours of questioning.

This is consistent with Islamic teachings -- the taking of infidel women as sex slaves is in accordance with Islamic law.

Our ads offering help for vicitms like this are banned.

A spokesman for David Cameron, the British prime minister, said he regarded the case as “utterly appalling.”

Cameron's crocodile tears are transparent. He advocates and supports the very ideology that makes for this kind of abuse and slavery. What is utterly appalling is Cameron's craven dhimmitude.

The women — a 69-year-old from Malaysia, a 57-year-old from Ireland and a 30-year-old Briton — were subjected to decades of physical abuse and beatings after being brainwashed by their captors in a house in Lambeth, south London.

The women — a 69-year-old from Malaysia, a 57-year-old from Ireland and a 30-year-old Briton — were subjected to decades of physical abuse and beatings after being brainwashed by their captors in a house in Lambeth, south London.

“What [we] are trying to understand is what were the invisible handcuffs that were used to exert such a degree of control over these women. Trying to label this investigation as domestic servitude or forced labour is far too simple. What we have uncovered so far is a complicated and disturbing picture of emotional control over many years; brainwashing would be the simplest term, yet that belittles the years of emotional abuse these victims have had to endure.

In March 2012, 16-year-old Filali committed suicide in the northern town of Larache by taking rat poison after she was forced to marry her rapist.

Her death provoked several demonstrations and the Twitter hashtag #RIPAmina to demand the repeal of Article 475.
According to Article 475, a rapist can avoid a prison sentence by marrying his victim. The law is based on a similar measure in France.

Obama lifted the ban on child soldiers, reversing President George W. Bush's law, the  “Child Soldiers Prevention Act of 2008.” That law that made it a federal crime to recruit or use soldiers under the age of 15. The law also gave the United States authority to “prosecute, deport or deny entry to individuals who have knowingly recruited children as soldiers.”

British Students Threatened With "Racial Discrimination Note" For Skipping Islamic Field Trip
    Refusal to allow your child to attend this trip will result in a Racial Discrimination note being attached to your child's education record, which will remain on this file throughout their school career.

How severe the dhimmis are in enforcing, promoting dawah (proselytizing for Islam, a religious mandate). How stern. If only they had such conviction, such civilizational self-esteem. Parents should organize and protest, or will they, too, suffer a permanent mark on their record?

 Mishal Husain, OIC, Roma, Sayeeda Warsi, Sharia, Sharia'h, Sheffield

Saturday, November 9, 2013

Trying to hide the main (and evil) pillar of islam in the deep sea while it's still around and well


Listen to Mishal Husain's blood thirsty voice by playing this video

Mishal Husain was chosen by BBC allegedly to help adjusting BBC's skewed sex-ratio (not gender ratio - gender means culture*). However, the main reason was without a doubt because she was muslim (and the right sort of muslim of course).

* read Klevius sex and gender tutorial

Klevius comment: So in short, BBC managed to employ a woman who is against basic Human Rights for women while trying to make the public believe it was for equality between the sexes!

British soldier gets life in prison for fighting muslim terrorists while murderer Obama continues sitting in the White House

Here's an other muslim born* (apostate?!) supporter of Human Rights violating evil islam. He is still at large although he has committed exactly the same crime (i.e. murdering a muslim terrorist) as the British soldier who faces life in prison. Only difference being that Mr X "president" Barry Barakeh Husain Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever) from a calm and safe White House not only ordered the murdering (not the capture/arrest) of Osama bin Laden, but also ordered the desecration of his body by throwing it in the sea, whereas the British soldier was under extreme psychological stress in intensive action after having fought against a muslim who wanted to murder him and who had already and just before not only murdered his pals but also hanged their mutilated body parts around the place! And the British soldier not even murdered the muslim terrorist. Murder needs intent and he thought the muslim terrorist was already dead when he in his anger and stress shot a bullet in what he thought was a corpse. Wrong yes (i.e. desecration of a dead), but not a murder and not at all comparable with Obama's crime.

* Would you believe it! There are still media people blabbing the nonsense mantra that Obama isn't a muslim (or a muslim apostate)! Born to a muslim father makes you a muslim according to islam and the only way out is apostasy, period! It's the very basic principle of islam! And it doesn't help at all if your father wasn't an "active muslim".

For you who have not yet realized that islam throughout 1400 years is (by far) the worst ideological hate crime ever committed against humanity - please make yourself a service and study history! It's all there and the deeper you dig the more it will smell, believe you me! And this is the reason why islam supporters have to use such low means as "islamophobia", blasphemy laws, muslim "sensitivities" etc etc!

It's all up to you, either you support Human Rights equality or islamic Sharia racism/sexism!

Friday, November 1, 2013

Mishal Husain, BBC's Sharia presenter against Human Rights

Rat or mouse?

A "presenter"  of anti Human Rights evil disguised with "right" accent and "right" education

                                          play video and judge for yourself

This muslim woman was chosen by BBC allegedly to help adjusting BBC's skewed sex-ratio (not gender ratio - gender means culture*). However, the main reason was without a doubt because she was muslim (and the right sort of muslim of course).

* read Klevius sex and gender tutorial

Klevius comment: So in short, BBC managed to employ a woman who is against basic Human Rights for women while trying to make the public believe it was for equality between the sexes!

here's what Klevius wrote five years ago

Thursday, December 04, 2008

WARNING! Born antifascist, UN is now, 60 years later, the main defender of (islamo)fascism - by the help of spineless idiots!

Saudi Arabia, the homeland of islam, the worst crime ever against humanity, & the most intolerant, hate mongering sexist & racist nation in the world (btw, 15 of the 19 Wahhabi Arabs of the 9/11 attacks were Saudis following Saudi-born Osama bin Laden) has now taken over the institution that was created precisely as a protection against such nations & movements!

In November 24, 2008, U.N. passed a draft resolution against "defamation of islam", initiated by Saudi Arabia + 56 other islamofascist member states of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC).

The propaanda background was the 2005 Danish cartoon "controversy" which started almost half a year after the images of Muhammad were first published, but just before the UNHCR was about to consider the OIC's resolution on "Combating Defamation of islam". According to the National Secular Society in its Memorandum to the UK Parliament "the Danish cartoon crisis was manufactured…to exploit sensitivities around racial discrimination and to promote (or even exaggerate) the notion of 'Islamophobia' in order to restrict possibilities for open discussion or criticism of Islam….[M]easures calling for legislation banning 'defamation of religion' …. aim[] to remove religion, especially Islam, from public scrutiny and public debate".

A meeting, closed to the press, with Ban Ki-moon to which General Assembly President "Father" Miguel d'Escoto Brockmann invited member states, secretly discussed islamofascist Abdullah's initiatives. Ban Ki-moon's envoy Terje Roed Larsen, keen on Saudi funding, seems to have been Saudi Abdullah's eager errand boy in this deeply embarrassing & evil matter.

When Miguel d'Escoto Brockmann was asked about the "defamation of islam" resolution first he said he'd never heard abt it. However, when asked what he thought abt a resolution that violated freedom of expression, he said "Defamation of religion should be banned".

The OIC bloc of Islamic nations also demands us to stop using the word ‘islam’ in reports on islamic terrorism!

Klevius comment: extreme reality-avoidance
Indite islam! Fascism is a crime in most of the free, non-islamic world!

And make the story abt Ayaan Hirsi Ali compulsory teaching at school. And if you haven’t time enough, remove islam propaganda from the curricullum!

When will the world wake up? Too late again?!