TheresaMay's racist robbing of EU citizens' Human Rights

The Saudi Fuhrer of Saudi based islamofascist OIC

BBC's compulsory fee funded propaganda for Saudi sharia islam

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Sayeeda Warsi like all sharia muslims is against basic Human Rights

Theresa May is for sharia and EU - but against EU's Human Rights Court which condemns sharia

Klevius is probably now the world's foremost expert on sex segregation (sad isn't it), and islam (the worst cime ever) is the foremost expression of sex segregation. By 'islam' Klevius means the same as true sharia supporting (and therefore against the most basic of Human Rights) muslims.

British muslim jihadists: Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo (who murdered Le

Saturday, November 22, 2014

An attacking "peaceful religion"

Human Rights means diversity - islam/sharia means the very opposite! The only diversity islam knows about is its various ways to attack!


Syed Sadaqat Hussain, November 09, 2014: I always find hard to write on blasphemy because I am afraid to be a victim of the wrath of the so called illiterate pseudo Ulema among the Muslims, who have made my country (Pakistan) a hell for humans. Since 1980s, when the military dictator Gen. Muhammad Zia ul-Haq updated the old colonial laws that criminalized “insulting the religion of any class of persons”, the advantage of this law is being taken by the illiterate clerics of this country who can mobilize seventy percent illiterate people of this country against the minorities.

Klevius question to BBC's Pakistani (but brought up in Saudi Arabia) sharia presenter Mishal Husain: Are you an illiterate muslim? And do you still long for more effective muslim attacks on Jews?

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo all have islam and sharia in common.

Islam's "peaceful" attacks

Islam can never be peaceful. When islam is a "peaceful religion" it's dead because it then looses its attacking power and evil allure. Islam means submission, i.e. to put others down by referring to a third party for judgment or decision. This "third party" is called Allah but because he is never accessible the real "third person" is the licenced authority of being a true muslim against infidels. Although submission can be produced in different ways, e.g. by murdering the infidel or the infidel converting, what is always necessary is aggressive attack, the very soul of islam. As juat one example of islam's variety of attack strategies one may take the simple fact that the reproductive math in islam gives no peace for anything else than a muslim man. It's the muslim man who can marry whoever and who transfers the inevitable muslimhood of the sons while the daughters are forbidden to marry non muslim. Just make a game out of such rules and you will see it's inevitable that the other part will loose.

It's truly extremist and deeply immoral to support such an intolerant attacking racist sexist totalitarian hate ideology!





Islam's attack on little girls


Islam didn't invent the sword. So does this mean that islam has nothing to do with it when a muslim murders an "infidel" with a sword in accordance to the Koran, islamic law etc? That Muhammad's murderous attacks on Jews and other non-muslims had nothing to do with islam?

Female genital mutilation wasn't invented by islam (actually nothing has been invented by islam except the institutionalized jihad/rapetivism axis). However, it's among muslims it's by far most prevalent. In the biggest muslim country Indonesia it's practically 100%.

Susanne Mubarak, former Egyptian president's wife (2007): It is a flagrant example of continued physical and psychological violence against children which must stop.

Klevius: It was the hated western supported Mubarak regime that legislated against FGM in Egypt. Yet it seems to no effect. In Egypt more than 90% of muslim women have mutilated genitals. This 12 year old Egyptian girl, Sohair al-Bata'a, died after genital mutilation. Family and doctor freed from any responsibility. As was islam! The question should not be: What went wrong?

The question should be: Why did they do it to her?


Islam tends to attract evil people and evil deeds while those more ignorant about islam are usually less religiously evil yet prone to defend 'their faith' (read the immoral of their faith) against the West (read against Human Rights equality).


According to most surveys those who profess no religion or self-identify as a-theist or agnostic are more likely to be white or East Asian and less likely to be black, Mideasterner, West/South East Asian.

Klevius advice for an immediate and considerable reduction of so called "muslim extremists" i.e. true muslims: Stop telling lies about islam to our kids! The average muslim or non-muslim young student doesn't know the difference between sharia and Human Rights despite the troublesome fact that they all have been force fed with a massive propaganda education about islam!

Klevius (1992): Whereas God-religions (i.e. not to be confused with Buddhism, Shintoism, Taoism etc a-theist moral teachings) are mirrors, true moral ideologies are windows. And the ultimate moral window is the so called Negative Human Rights. Don't look so confused - look it up!

Also educate yourself with a comparison of OIC's disgusting sharia declaration.

Monday, November 17, 2014

A woman scored the goal of the year - but will it be dismissed because of sex segregation?


Some heroic Saudi women challenging islamic sharia* and

 Stephanie Roche who scored the goal of the year



Stephanie Roche began playing football with the boys on the streets of her native Shankill (compare Pia Sundhage in Klevius PhD thesis). After a brief spell with Valeview FC was curtailed by rules against mixed–sex football she started playing only with girls/women.

See some other beautiful female goals further down.

Btw, this website is already banned by FIFA!



Wonder why. Is it because it, contrary to sharia, defends ALL people's Human Rights or is it because it supports female football - or both?

* Some stupid brainwashed (or deliberately evil) people might try to argue that there are many islams (just like feminists used to say there are 'many feminisms' before Klevius intellectually made it an illogical joke back in the 1990s). However, it all works like this. Saudi initiated, Saudi based and Saudi steered OIC has (via UN) declared not only that sharia should apply to all muslims but also that every muslim country can decide by itself what their particular sharia version means. Moreover, OIC's own global "reference sharia" (the so called Cairo declaration on "human rights in islam") openly declares that sharia always tops Human Rights - hence making the latter a criminal offence against sharia.  







Islam is a dictatorship - even in sports


The extreme stupidity of normative* islam


* Saudi Arabia is not only the Guardian of islam but also the most powerful force behind all the world's muslims world organization OIC which is not only initiated by Saudi Arabia but also based in Saudi Arabia/Jeddah and led by an islamofascist from the Saudi dictator family.
What is the difference between muslim Ottoman harems and the organized and widespread child sex abuse among muslims in the West (compare the Rochdale case and many other similar cases in UK etc). The vulnerable girls were already taken as Ottoman slaves or as the target for insensitive and basically purely commercial state interventions not in the best interest of the child (see the most important sociological paper from the last century, Angels of Antichrist - kinship vs social state) before they were abused. However, just as in the islamic muslim sex slave harems, the abused Rochdale girls themselves often denied being abused because of some futile favors they first seemed to get.


So next time you see a wealthy Saudi woman "defending" islam/sharia, please consider the extremely simple fact that under Human Rights women can do what they like with their bodies, but under sharia there is always impositions and limitations! So why choose sharia when it means imposing your life choice on others, including vulnerable girls?!





There seems to be an almost total lack of sociologist challenging sex segregation. A possible exception is Pierre Bourdieu's cautious and defensive Masculine Domination which, by the way, may well be his thinnest book. Already the title seems to try avoiding a closer look on feminine domination (of females).

According to Bourdieu. the effects of social position may in some cases reinforce the effects of gender, or in other cases attenuate them, without, it seems, ever eliminating them. By contrast, intensive practice of a sport leads to a profound transformation of the subjective and objective experience of the  body. It no longer exists only for others or, it is no longer merely a thing that is made to be looked at or which one has to look at in order to prepare it to be looked at.
Instead of being a body for others it becomes a body for oneself; the passive body becomes an active and acting body. In the eyes of men, however, those women who break the tacit relation of availability and in a sense re-appropriate their body image, and with it their body, appear as 'unfeminine', even lesbian (Bourdieu 2001:67-68).

In this respect Bourdieu seems to echo Tertullian who, in the early years of Christianity, labeled women's wish to free themselves from the male gaze (heterosexual attraction) as a 'sport of Nature'. Bourdieu continues:

If the old structures of the sexual division seem still to deter-
mine the very direction and form of these changes, this is
because as well as being objectified in disciplines, careers and
jobs that are more or less strongly characterized sexually, they
act through three practical principles which women, and also
their social circles, apply in their choices. The first is that the
functions appropriate to women are an extension of their
domestic functions - education, care and service. The second
is that a woman cannot have authority over men, and, other
things being equal, therefore has every likelihood of being
passed over in favour of a man for a position of authority and
of being confined to subordinate and ancillary functions. The
third principle gives men the monopoly of the handling of tech-
nical objects and machines (Bourdieu 2001).

However, sex segregation is much deeper and multi faceted. Heterosexual attraction need not be a problem neither for women nor men - this has been showed by the West since the 1960s (yes, many men used the time for abuse but most didn't) - but it can easily be used in a confusing/self-confusing manner which opens up for totalitarian sex segregation.

Sex segregation - could also be defined as unnecessary limitations connected to physical differences that has nothing to do with these limitations. However, what is needed in sex segregation studies is the most natural follow up questions. Who questions 'femininity' and 'sexual orientation' and why?

When you pull up that net Klevius wouldn't be surprised to see some (most?) women as well.









What klevius said/showed

Sunday, December 27, 2009

Islamic OIC is an evil dead end of sex segregation whereas football is freedom

Do you see the evil cloud on the map? It's sex segregation: OIC consists of 57 racist/sexist islamic nations which have agreed to violate the negative human rights, i.e. the basis for freedom & democracy!
WHAT A MEDIA HYPOCRISY WHEN THE MUSLIM NIGERIAN TERRORIST IS DESCRIBED AS "EXTREMIST" WHILE HIS TALIBAN LIKE SHARIA ISLAMIC HOME TOWN (stonings, mutilations, corrupt "Sharia banking" etc) IS DESCRIBED AS "MODERATE"! North Nigeria is a disgusting reminder of islamic slavery & islam's devastating effects on Africa through 1400 yrs! AND CONSIDER THAT KLEVIUS HAS FOR LONG BEEN YOUR ONLY TRUE, INTELLIGENT & WELL INFORMED NEUTRAL (yes!) VOICE AGAINST EVILSEX SEGREGATION ON THE NET (the link is abt women's football as well)!




Did Germany's Birgit Prinz, score the best ever goal (incl. those of men) in 2009?

Klevius motivation:

1 The attack (from an in-throw) was as clean as it gets. Check out the video & consider how Simone Laudehr's extremely well placed pass (into an open but crucial area) is taken by Inka Grings who was initially further from the ball than Prinz, who runs in the opposite direction.

2 Inka Grings then does just the opposite to what one would have expected. Instead of running with the ball into the empty space from where she could have tried a cross to Birgit Prinz, she turns against & between two defenders and quickly squares the ball across the penalty area just before Birgit Prinz encounters the defenders.

3 Birgit Prinz accelerates strongly & manages not only to reach the ball before a defender crashes into her, but also to cheat the goalkeeper (see how the keeper moves to the wrong direction) while then perfectly turning her foot in the last fraction of a second to give the ball ultimate precision, before she is smashed to the ground by the flying defender.

Who said women's football is boring?


Size doesn't matter in football
However, although Birgit Prinz is a six footer (179 cm), in footbal you can be any size & still world class. Lionel Messi, the world's best male player 2009 is 169 cm/67 kg, while the next best (Xavi) is 170 cm/69 kg! Third place Ronaldo is 185 cm. Among women Marta da Silva (162 cm/57 kg) is the world's best player for the fourth year in a row, with Birgit Prinz right behind!

Football is the most emancipating sport in the world

This goal hasn’t even been mentioned among the best, perhaps because women’s football is hardly mentioned at all in the media. And the reason for this is the same as with evil islam, namely that so many women participate in directing girls into the sex segregation trap of their own *starting physically with Indonesian muslim women who mutilate every female child, to Western glamour feminists who push their daughters into the time consuming trap of empty & pointless artificial "feminization".

As Otto Weininger put it a century ago: "The main obstacle for women's emancipation is the Woman".
Klevius doesn't in any sense want to point out how women should behave, quite the contrary. He couldn't call himself intelligent if he would, could he! However, what Klevius does want to do is to help minimizing the number of girls who limit themselves or commit self rape becaudse of cultural sexism. In this Klevius stands in the deapest oppositition to islam, while Mr X US "president" says he "respect" islam (and no wonder, look at his islamofascist pals)!

Origin of islam & its evil parasitic booty/sex/slavery/reproduction formula
Btw, a professor friend (sociology) thinks I “uber-emphasize” sex segregation. My question then to him & to all of you is: How can one ever “uber-emphasize” something that affects negatively & directly HALF of the world population, & indirectly the WHOLE of the world population, & which is upheld on no logical grounds at all?! And which constitutes the cornerstone for the evil interface between islam & the rest of the world! And which constitutes the main difference in OIC's Cairo Declaration which (initiated by Saudi islamic theocracy) aims for the destruction of UN's 1948 Human Rights Declaration, combined with a global effort (via UN) to criminalize criticism of islam! Read more from Klevius (e.g. From Freud to bin Laden or What is sex segregation?) to understand why islam & feminism share so much & why the first feminists didn't support votes for women! And why feminists can't agree if Mary Wollstonecraft was a feminist or an anti-feminist!

Or perhaps Klevius Marriage, kinship & friendship

Or even better, the most important sociological paper from the last century: Angels of Antichrist - kinship vs social state


Sunday, February 19, 2012

Swedish Aftonbladet: Breivik’s and the West’s world view rests on three legs: anti-communism, anti-feminism and islamophobia

Communists, feminists and islamofascists dictate Swedish news media - but Klevius, the worst enemy of fascists and true feminists, doesn't fit their description at all. How come?

Åsa Linderborg (a communist islam loving feminist and chief cultural editor on Scandinavia’s biggest news paper who has profited on her dead working class dad by writing shit about him in a well selling book): Breivik’s and "the leader's of the West" (incl. "Christian members of the cabinet")  world view "rests on three legs: anti-communism, anti-feminism and islamophobia". The “politically correct”, she writes, has for decades been accused for destroying the West. That women should be women and that only the heterosexual nuclear family may produce sound citizens, is an opinion that Breivik shares with both think tanks and Christian members of the Cabinet. Fear of multi-culturalism (why not call it with its proper name Sharia?! – Klevius comment) constitutes the basis for populist government politics in the whole of Europe. The leaders of the West share Breivik’s opinion that muslims are people one is allowed to kill".


Klevius comment: Let's see. No, Klevius doesn't approve of communism and hence sadly has to admit that he "shares the view of Western leaders". And no, Klevius doesn't approve of islam either which fact, according to Saudi islamofascists and their world muslim organization OIC with its Sharia violation of Human Rights, renders Klevius and his stubborn defense of Human (incl. girls/women) Rights the status of being declared an "islamophobe". So what about feminism? Well, almost as long as Klevius has been able to write he has opposed feminism if by feminism we mean its original meaning namely that women should keep up artificial cultural "femininity" as to not "become men" (see e.g. Human Rights from Klevius without love) i.e. what is also called sex segregation and sex apartheid (the very core of islam and feminism).


Feminist opposition to football in England and Sweden

In 1921 England had the world's best female football team. However, due to feminist resistance against females playing football FA banned them from its grounds. The decision was based on a female feminist physician's expert statement that "...the game of football is quite unsuitable for females and ought not to be encouraged."

In Sweden, from the late 1960's for about about a decade feminists (the communist Grupp 8 - Sweden's main feminist movement) very actively opposed female football. Later on Swedish feminists still oppose female football although more under cover and in the form of spitting at penis equipped football experts dealing with female football as "patriarchal domination" when in reality it's been the lack of female ones that has been the problem. And this lack is of course to a large extent to be connected to the active female dismissal of female football. Which fact doesn't exclude the "religious" renaissance for sexist men, not the least via islam. As Klevius has always pointed out: Chauvinism and feminism are married!



In 2011 Japan became the world champion in female football (aka "soccer" in the US so not to confuse it with the "manly" handball game Americans call "football").

Karima Maruyama's 2011 World Cup goal was a real classic when it comes to football technique. Running at high speed towards the side of the goal and then, at the right microsecond,directing a kick just outside the opposite goalpost, hence utilizing the forward inertia in the ball curving it enough to be out of reach for the goalkeeper while still making its way to the inside of the post. Everyone who knows anything about real football honors these kinds of smart goals.And no, it wans't a crossball. She was alone´, she (and the ball) had full speed forward and she had to chose a direct shot at the nearest post or the trickier but under the circumstances right decision to go for the far end of the goal.

So why does Klevius keep ranting about it? Well, simply because this goal and the whole match as well as many other female goals/matches show that the better footballers these women are the more "manly" (or unisex if you like) their technique.


Islam and OIC's Sharia violation of Human Rights is all about sex segregation - and Klevius, not feminists, is, sadly, your best expert on it!

Sunday, November 16, 2014

Who is Allah's best friend - and the worst enemy of Human Rights?

There are now more British muslims fighting for the Islamic State than for Britain's military. And most true British muslims support Islamic State.

Islamic State rests on Saudi Wahhabism and Saudi funds. And Saudi Arabia is a close ally of Cameron (and enemy of Putin). Moreover, the Saudi initiated, based and steered sharia organization OIC is another close ally via Cameron's non-elected minister of faith islamofascism, Sayeeda Warsi whom he personally elected as baroness. In other words, Cameron's closest woman is a grave violator of the most basic of Human Rights because of her sharia support and UK representative in OIC. That's why Cameron hates Human Rights and paves the way for making Britain a Saudi Arabia outside the cradle of islam.



Islamic State to Putin: 'This is a message to you, oh Vladimir Putin, these are the jets that you have sent to Bashar, we will send them to you, God willing, remember that.

    And we will liberate Chechnya and the entire Caucasus, God willing," said the militant. "The Islamic State is and will be and it is expanding God willing.
    Your throne has already teetered, it is under threat and will fall when we come to you because Allah is truly on our side.


Paul J. Saunders: Putin often acknowledges the country’s significant Muslim minority, including during a major 2013 speech focusing on Russia’s national identity, during which he said that “Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, Judaism and other religions are an integral part of Russia’s identity, its historical heritage and the present-day lives of its citizens.” Importantly, Putin went on to argue, “It is clearly impossible to identify oneself only through one’s ethnicity or religion in such a large nation with a multi-ethnic population. … People must develop a civic identity on the basis of shared values, a patriotic consciousness, civic responsibility and solidarity, respect for the law and a sense of responsibility for their homeland’s fate, without losing touch with their ethnic or religious roots.”

Apparently responding in no small part to controversy in the West, in the months prior to the Olympic Games in Sochi, over Russia’s law imposing fines on individuals or organizations that present “propaganda” about homosexuality to minors, Putin has increasingly emphasized Russians’ shared moral values and to connect Russia’s “traditional” values to those in the Middle Eastern, Asian and other non-Western societies. “We can see how many of the Euro-Atlantic countries are actually rejecting their roots, including the Christian values that constitute the basis of Western civilization … and people are aggressively trying to export this model all over the world. I am convinced that this opens a direct path to degradation and primitivism, resulting in a profound demographic and moral crisis. … We consider it natural and right to defend these values​​.” While clearly identifying Russia as a largely Christian country, Putin is attempting to establish a dividing line between the shared values of believers in many religious traditions and those of the decadent secular West.

Putin was explicit about his foreign policy objectives, saying, “Russia agrees with those who believe that key decisions should be worked out on a collective basis, rather than at the discretion of and in the interests of certain countries or groups of countries. Russia believes that international law, not the right of the strong, must apply. And we believe that every country, every nation is not exceptional, but unique, original and benefits from equal rights, including the right to independently choose their own development path.” Thus, Putin is attempting to exploit huge differences in social values between the West and predominantly Muslim countries in the Middle East and North Africa to make Western values into a liability rather than an asset for Western governments. If consistently implemented over time, this may become Russia’s most significant effort to date to develop a soft power strategy to combat Western influence in the Middle East and elsewhere in the Islamic world.

Klevius:The above, dear reader, is what you really need to focus on. Logically a true muslim should not be allowed to vote as long as s/he doesn't reject sharia. However, as it stands now it's precisely the anti-democratic sharia muslims who multiply fastest due to islamic rapetivism ideology. And as long as their votes count politicians try to get them (no matter that most voting fraud happens in muslim communities). Spice this with oil/gas and you start seeing why Klevius writings are essential, not the least because of Klevius lack of financial or political motives.

And to top it all, non-religious Klevius seems to be your best analyst due to his superior (sad isn't it) understanding of sex segregation and its connection to the origin of islam.


Sunday, November 9, 2014

Communism is dead - islam is dying. Long live Human Rights!





Communism at its peak


 
and some Communist zombies clinging on

Acknowledgement: Care for proofread and edited text? Then start donating!

Now it's not IS (Islamic State) but IU (Islamic Ummah/OIC*) that is the worst threat to the free world

* The Turkish wannabe Ottoman Caliph (according to himself), Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, who previously used to lead the OIC Caliphate together with the Saudi caliph (yes, there have been more than one caliph before), who gets his position as “the Guardian of islam” because the Sauds’ right hand happens to possess the stolen land where Mecca and Medina are situated as well as the oil that generates the the wealth of the Saud family! OIC’s former Fuhrer, Secretary-General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu himself said “that for 13 centuries, muslims had shared a feeling of belonging to the muslim ummah, or global community, bound together under the banner of the caliphate that ended when the modern Turkish republic succeeded the Ottoman Empire in the years after World War I. Following the abolition of the Ottoman Caliphate, many muslims found themselves, for the first time throughout their history, facing the absence of the polity under which they lived for several centuries. The establishment of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (now name changed to the Organization of the Islamic Cooperation) can be seen as the embodiment of the concept of islamic solidarity in the contemporary world”. However, OIC was initiated by, based in, and now also led by Saudi Arabia.



Under a worldwide muslim sharia Umma (OIC) Saudi islamofascism is protected from Human Rights criticism


Had the Saudi islamofascist not been that stupid and presumptuous* that they created OIC as an open excuse for abandoning Human Rights, then the downfall of islam might had become less "revolutionary".

* spurred by ignorant or cunning islam supporters in the West (many of them communists)


The muslim UK ambassador of Saudi islamofascism implies that 'the vast majority of muslims around the world' are Wahhabists - or


Mohammed bin Nawaf Al Saud, Ambassador of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to the United Kingdom: Muhammad Ibn Abd al Wahhab, was a well-travelled, learned, scholarly jurist of the 18th century. He insisted on adherence to Qur’anic values and the teachings of the prophet Muhammad (PBUH) which includes the maximum preservation of human life, even in the midst of jihad. He taught tolerance and supported the rights of both men and women.

Klevius: See below, Klevius' more truthful description of this immoral muslim islamofascist cleric.

Mohammed bin Nawaf Al Saud, Ambassador of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to the United Kingdom: Let me make it perfectly clear. The government of Saudi Arabia does not support or fund the murderers who have collected under the banner of the Islamic State. Their ideology is not one that we recognise, or that would be recognised by the vast majority of Muslims around the world – whether they were Sunni or Shia.

Klevius: Nor would the Saudi ideology!

Mohammed bin Nawaf Al Saud, Ambassador of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to the United Kingdom: Under the leadership of the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques, King Abdullah, we launched an initiative for dialogue between all religions and cultures in 2008 with the establishment of the King Abdullah Bin Abdulaziz International Centre for Interreligious and Intercultural Dialogue in Vienna.

Klevius: Why not in Mecca?!

Mohammed bin Nawaf Al Saud, Ambassador of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to the United Kingdom: Following an international counterterrorism conference held in Riyadh in 2005, the UN counterterrorism centre was established with financial support of $200m from our government. We have been and are fighting extremism within our own borders daily, indeed hourly.

Klevius: Really! Counterterrorism? Meaning chasing down Human Rights defenders, Atheists etc "terrorists" and "extremists" in accordance with your new sharia laws protected by your own islamofascist UN organization OIC!

Mohammed bin Nawaf Al Saud, Ambassador of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to the United Kingdom: Firm action is taken against any imam who is found to hold extremist views (like the Shia imam you are about to behead) and who tries to incite their followers to violence (i.e. what you in other contexts name liberators). We have passed laws and warned our citizens that they will be arrested and prosecuted if they attempt to join Isis or any other international terrorist group, or to take part in any of the conflicts raging in any region. We have done and will do everything we can to stop the spread of this corrosive poison in our country and region and encourage all other governments to do the same.

Klevius: You are the 'corrosive poison' that has ruined so many peoples lives! Not only are you the world's worst per capita polluter, you are also the country with the worst Human Rights record. And no wonder because you have criminalized Human Rights equality. You are the most immoral and hypocritical state the world has ever seen!



David Commins, author of “The Wahhabi Mission and Saudi Arabia” and a professor at Dickinson College in Pennsylvania: Islamic State and Wahhabi doctrines overlap in puritanism and xenophobia toward non-muslims and Shiite”. A key difference is the caliphate agenda used by Islamic State’s leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi and a revival of a term used by earlier islamic leaders that suggests a wider ambition to rule all Muslims. That was never part of Wahhabi doctrine.

Klevius, the world's foremost expert on sex segregation/apartheid (sad isn't it) and therefore also origin of islam: Of course it was, it just lacked the means. Wahhabism means going back to the origin of islam and that inevitably means opening up for whatever totalitarian world conquering ambitions. Certainly bigger than Hitler and his German Nationalsocialists ever dreamt about.

James Dorsey, a senior fellow in international studies at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore: Abdulaziz halted his expansion once most of the Arabian Peninsula was conquered, and turned against the Ikhwan, whose main leaders later surrendered to the British. That history underscores another distinction with Islamic State, that between an established power and an expansionist upstart.

Klevius, the world's foremost expert on sex segregation/apartheid (sad isn't it) and therefore also the origin of islam: Established power? Like the Soviet union!

James Dorsey: The House of Saud wants to ensure its grip on power and doesn’t seek to expand beyond its borders or “create one unified Muslim state that would be ruled by a caliph. Islamic State seeks to topple existing regimes that it views as apostate.

Klevius: Then he pukes out the usual PC vomit: Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah, has tentatively promoted women’s role in the workplace since ascending to the throne in 2005 and encouraged thousands of young Saudis to study abroad through a state-sponsored scholarship program.

Klevius, the world's foremost expert on sex segregation/apartheid (sad isn't it) and therefore also the origin of islam:  Poor dictator "king" Abdullah, all women's liberator in his heroic fight against the unspecified dark forces in Saudi Arabia?! Really?

Fahad Nazer, a political analyst at JTG Inc., a consultancy based in Vienna, Virginia, who has worked for the Saudi Embassy in Washington: Comparing Saudi Arabia to the Islamic State “neglects the gradual but significant cultural change that has taken place since the 1990 Gulf War.

Klevius, the world's foremost expert on sex segregation/apartheid (sad isn't it) and therefore also the origin of islam: 'The gradual but significant cultural change' is nothing else than petrol-dollars and as such doesn't alter the evilness of original islam in any positive direction. Saudi fueled global street jihadism is directly proportional to the oil barrel price.



Wahhabism is more or less the same in Saudi Arabia and the Islamic State


A dominant strand to the Saudi identity pertains directly to Muhammad ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhab (the founder of Wahhabism), and the use to which his radical, exclusionist puritanism was put by Ibn Saud. (The latter was then no more than a minor leader -- amongst many -- of continually sparring and raiding Bedouin tribes in the baking and desperately poor deserts of the Nejd.)

The second strand relates to dictator  Abd-al Aziz's subsequent shift towards statehood in the 1920s: his curbing of Ikhwani violence (in order to have diplomatic standing as a nation-state with Britain and America); his institutionalization of the original Wahhabist impulse -- and the subsequent seizing of the opportunely surging petrodollar spigot in the 1970s, to channel the volatile Ikhwani current away from home towards export.

Based on the 14th century islamist Ibn Taymiyyah, Abd al-Wahhab, despised the decorous, arty, tobacco smoking, hashish imbibing, drum pounding Egyptian and Ottoman nobility who travelled across Arabia to pray at Mecca.

Taymiyyah had declared war on Shi'ism, Sufism and Greek philosophy.

One of the main tenets of Abd al-Wahhab's doctrine has become the key idea of takfir. Under the takfiri doctrine, Abd al-Wahhab and his followers could deem fellow Muslims infidels should they engage in activities that in any way could be said to encroach on the sovereignty of the absolute Authority (i.e. the "king").

There is really nothing that separates Wahhabism from the Islamic State other than that the latter is closer to Wahhabism than the Saud dictator family.

Like "prophet" Mohammad, Abd al-Wahhab was expelled from his own town and in 1741 he found refuge under the protection of Ibn Saud and his tribe. What Ibn Saud perceived in Abd al-Wahhab's novel teaching was the means to seizing power, again a repetition of the origin of islam. Their strategy, like that of the Islamic State today, was to bring the peoples whom they conquered into submission by instilling fear, and by "justifying" it as jihad.

Ibn Saud's gangsta clan, seizing on Abd al-Wahhab's doctrine, now could do what they (and "prophet" Mohammad) always did, i.e. raiding neighboring villages and robbing them of their possessions in true islamic manner.

In the beginning, they conquered a few local communities and imposed their rule over them. (The conquered inhabitants were given a limited choice: conversion to Wahhabism or death.) By 1790, the Alliance controlled most of the Arabian Peninsula and repeatedly raided Medina, Syria and Iraq.

A British official, Lieutenant Francis Warden: 'They pillaged the whole of it [Karbala], and plundered the Tomb of Hussein... slaying in the course of the day, with circumstances of peculiar cruelty, above five thousand of the inhabitants ..."

Osman Ibn Bishr Najdi: Ibn Saud committed a massacre in Karbala in 1801. We took Karbala and slaughtered and took its people (as slaves), then praise be to Allah, Lord of the Worlds, and we do not apologize for that and say: 'And to the unbelievers: the same treatment.'

In 1803, Abdul Aziz entered Mecca, which surrendered under the impact of terror and panic (as did Medina). Abd al-Wahhab's followers demolished historical monuments and all the tombs and shrines.

1803 a Shiite assassin killed Abdul Aziz (taking revenge for the massacre at Karbala). His son, Saud bin Abd al Aziz, succeeded him and continued the conquest of Arabia. In 1812, the Ottoman army pushed the Alliance out from Medina, Jeddah and Mecca. In 1814, Saud bin Abd al Aziz died and his son Abdullah bin Saud, was taken by the Ottomans to Istanbul, where he was executed after having been humiliated in the streets of Istanbul for three days, then hanged and beheaded, his severed head fired from a canon, and his heart cut out and impaled on his body.

18th century Wahhabism reignited when the Ottoman Empire collapsed during World War I. Compare this to the origin of islam in the wake of Roman withdrawal and the fall of the Sasanian empire. The Al Saud were led by Abd-al Aziz, who, on uniting the fractious Bedouin tribes, launched the Saudi "Ikhwan" in the spirit of Abd-al Wahhab.

The Ikhwan was a movement of armed Wahhabist "moralists" who almost had succeeded in seizing Arabia by the early 1800s. Now the Ikhwan again succeeded in capturing Mecca, Medina and Jeddah between 1914 and 1926. The Ikhwan and Abd-al Aziz, however, ended up in a civil war that lasted until the 1930s, when Abd-al Aziz by the help of Western technology had them machine-gunned down for good.

With the help from oil dug up and processed by Western technology Saudi goals were to reach out and spread Wahhabism across the Muslim world, thereby utilizing islam's "single creed" message for Saudi Arabia.

Sunni (i.e. Saudi) islam embedded Wahhabism educationally, socially and culturally throughout the muslim Umma, hence also
creating a western policy dependency on Saudi Arabia that has endured since Abd-al Aziz's meeting with Roosevelt.

Westerners chose to presume that Saudi Arabia was bending to the imperatives of modern life.




What Klevius has said before about Wahhab the father of Saudi islamofascism (2010)

The root man of Saudi islamofascism was Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahab who, during his studies in Basra in the 18th C, got seriously dazzled by glimpses of the European Enlightenment twinkling through the temporary crack to the West called the "Tulip period". He then retreated back into his medieval islamic darkness & as a result, came to position himself as the very opposite to the British "Glorious revolution" which fought against Catholic papacy, & which ended up in Lancashire's coal fueled textile industries as the beginning of the modern industrialized* world based on technology & rationality rather than on religious superstition & fundamentalism (also compare Shinto vs islam). A major outcome of industrialization was universal suffrage & the idea about negative human rights.

 * isn't it an irony then that Britain, who started the series of modern revolutions as well as industrialization, came to deeply embed itself with the most intolerant, racist & sexist constitution, i.e. the Saudi islamofascist state which was incapable of producing anything by itself except hatred & more fanatic muslims!

Together with the criminal "house of Saud" Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahab then confined the Arabs in islamic backwardness &, in addition, the Arab women in an islamic burka of extreme Sharia sex segregation/apartheid.

After having robbed Mecca & Medina, the Sauds/Wahhabis run the stolen country by the help of what they fleeced from visiting pilgrims. This was the main source of income until Westerners found/drilled oil & made the lazy islamist looters even wealthier.

(analysis taken from Homo Filius Nullius by Peter Klevius).

Klevius comment: And today this evilness threatens the free world through spineless politicians and UN! The banner of Enlightenment is now upheld by heroic women, e.g. African Ayaan Hirsi Ali who has suffered as a victim of islam(ofascism) and escaped to the West, only to find that she was abandoned by those she thought would protect her! In fact, Western politicians and media are busy implementing that very Arab-islamic oppression so many muslims have escaped!


Human rights vs islamofascist "rights"


According to Koran-islam only true muslims can be considered real humans. The rest of the world hence belongs to either category two infidels "of the book" and or category three infidels (without "a book" presumably). However, there's also a fourth category which can never reach a fully human level in accordance with Koran-islam. Those are girls and women!

Sex segregation is to be understood as lack of rights because of one’s sex as referred to in the UN Declaration on Human Rights from 1948: "Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in the Human Rights Declaration, without distinction of sex. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty."

This conceptualization may be compared to the sex segregated "rights", in the Cairo declaration from 1990: "All men are equal in terms of basic human dignity and basic obligations and responsibilities, without any discrimination on the grounds of sex."

The main difference between these declarations is that the former is negative, i.e. without room for interpretations and negotiation and due interventions, whereas the latter is positive, i.e. connected to “obligations and responsibilities”. Negative rights are here seen as not synonymous with natural rights, because the latter presumes the existence of certain rights, i.e. is in fact positive, whereas the former does not.

Whereas "entitled all the freedoms" is a negative right, "basic human dignity and basic obligations and basic responsibilities" are all positive rights. Through "responsibilities" negative human rights can easily be restricted & even eliminated.

Furthermore, "in terms of basic human dignity and basic obligations and basic responsibilities" are all tied to some imagined or real basic tenets which may include whatever tradition or belief about segregation that is at hand, i.e. the very opposite to freedom in the original UN charter. The very fact that "obligations and responsibilities" are mentioned and tied to "equal" opens up for inequality on the grounds of sex. If dignity, obligations and responsibilities are coupled to sex it inevitably means that they differ between the sexes.

So when Mary Wollstonecraft wrote A Vindication of the Rights of Woman the Saudi islamofascists were already busy with the opposite task, i.e. the original islam. In fact, the true nature of islam & its “Allah” is now slowly emerging in all its evil infidel racism & sexist confinement/rapetivism, easily traceable through 1400 years of heinous crimes (incl. physical genocides, hundreds of millions murdered & enslaved) against humanity, not to mention ethnic & cultural genocides - still ongoing in Sudan etc.

Don't let Arabian oil wealth obscure the true nature of their backward ideology - not because it's backward but because it's truly evil!

The stereotype of the “peaceful” muslim isn’t true. S/he isn’t necessarily peaceful but rather ignorant about her own "religion" which is in fact nothing but politics pretending as a faith.



Here's what Klevius wrote

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Before shouting "islamophobia", aswer this question: Do you support islam or Human Rights? You can't get both!

Always this tiresome, empty but utterly laughable islam excuse "not all muslims are..."! Quite the contrary, By calling yourself a muslim believing in islam you inevitably also support OIC and Sharia, and, as a consequence, violate Human Rights (see more about this fact below)!

This is Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, an Egyptian born Turkish islamist and der Fuhrer of OIC, the Saudi initiated and based islamist organization that has abandoned Human Rights and replaced them with Sharia, and which tries to criminalize all scrutiny of islam's atrocities! Are you for or against him and OIC?

So let's rather talk about what real islam is really doing! I try to make it short and easy:

1 Real islam is today undeniably OIC (Organization of islamic cooperation). OIC consists of 57 member states and has abandoned Human Rights and replaced them with Sharia in the UN (a fact most ignorant "revolutionaries" in the "Arabic spring" were quite misinformed about!

2 Because of the enormity of islam's slavery and genocide atrocities throughout its existence, and because of the share numbers of those poor (because of islam's innate parasitism and due impotency for producing other than new muslims) people not daring (apostasy ban) calling themselves other than "muslims", many feel it's impossibly to really point out how disgusting islam really is!

Hence the only option is to cover it up by calling it "defamation of religion" thus protecting islam from its own evilness. It was pure evilness (hateful racism and sexism) that paved the way for islam's original jihad slaughtering and enslaving and much later on, under Malik, became Koran and Mohammedanism, i.e. the atrocities were reformulated as "the will of Allah", i.e. blamed on "god". Not only that, islam's specific evilness also consists of its one way policy, i.e. that islam ideally wants to swallow individuals but never let them out again. Likewise, for islam it's impossible to accept full equality between the sexes. Especially this point makes it impossible for islam to exist in a world that follows the 1948 Human Rights declaration which clearly states that there should not be any limitation because of an individuals sex etc.

Of course one could imagine a scenario were islam reforms in accordance with the basic freedom principles in the original Human Rights declaration. However, that would be the end of islam itself and Klevius could immediately stop writing about it! This ideal scenario, however, has been made impossible by Saudi based OIC and those who naively or deliberately have supported it! Every muslim who doesn't accept this must rename to non-Sharia muslim or abandon muslimhood altogether.

Tuesday, November 4, 2014

It's not Medieval - it's evil! The origin of islam is repeated right now - in Mideast and London!


Cameron wants London to be islam's capital outside Saudi Arabia

This is why he made a foreign born migrant from Egypt Deputy (so far) Bank of England governor. Nemat Shafik's family left Egypt in the 1960s, and she lived in the United States as a child, later returning to Egypt where she graduated from high school and attended the American University in Cairo. After two years of working on development issues in Egypt she then studied economics at the notorious* London School of Economics.

* The affair of the LSE Libya Links refers to the various connections that existed between the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) and the Libyan government and its leader Muammar Gaddafi and his son Saif al-Islam Gaddafi. The NGO Gaddafi Foundation pledged to donate £1.5 million over five years to a research centre, LSE Global Governance, of which £300k were paid. In addition, LSE Enterprise established a contract worth £2.2 million to train Libyan officials. In 2008, the LSE granted a PhD degree to Saif al-Islam Gaddafi, the son of the Libyan leader, for a dissertation. Currently, allegations circulate that Gaddafi's thesis was ghost-written and/or plagiarised. In December 2010, Muammar Gaddafi addressed members of the School in a video link-up where he was addressed as "Brother Leader" and received an LSE cap previously given to Nelson Mandela. In connection with the civil uprising in Libya in February and March 2011, the links between LSE and the Gaddafi regime, and the conduct of individual members of LSE's staff, came increasingly to be questioned. As a result of the revelations, the LSE's Director, Sir Howard Davies, resigned on 3 March 2011, citing "errors of judgement". In a New York Times op-ed piece on 7 March 2011, Roger Cohen wrote, in reference to events that had transpired at the School, "It may be possible to sink to greater depths but right now I can't think how. ...The Arab Spring is also a Western Winter. ...How did we back, use and encourage the brutality of Arab dictators over so many years? To what degree did that cynical encouragement of despots foster the very jihadist rage Western societies sought to curb?"


However, according to Cameron, a majority (see below) of London's muslims have nothing to do with islam (i.e. if they support Islamic State)!


Most young muslim settlers in the UK support Islamic State



According to a Populus survey one in seven young British adults has “warm feelings” towards Islamic State.
5.2 per cent of 18 to 34-year-olds gave it a nine or a ten score. Overall, 14% of under-25s and 12% of 25 to 34-year-olds gave Islamic State a score of between six and ten, implying a degree of sympathy.

A tenth of Londoners view Islamic State favorably, but sympathy for the militant group reaches its highest levels among the under-25s.

Muslim settlers in London make up 12%. A majority of them, perhaps as high as 80% (a million), support Islamic State.




 Time for muslims to abandon islam and to respect Human Rights?

Or get abandoned from the civilized world, as Cameron has already suggested (i.e. removing passport and citizenship from foreign born - so what about UK born jihadists?).

Would that mean that only muslim money is allowed in London - not muslim flesh?!

However, Klevius has a better suggestion.Stop calling the worst ideological racist/sexist genocidal and totalitarian hate crime ever on the planet a "peaceful religion"!

And start by simple 2+2+=4, namely that according to all muslims' world organization, Saudi based and Saudi steered OIC, sharia not only tops the most basic of Human Rights but also makes the defense of Human Rights a criminal act of terror.

Or hasn't your muslim Minister of faith islam (Sayeeda Warsi) informed you about it?


 Islamofascist OIC Fuhrer Iyad Madani from hate mongering Saudi Arabia, the most intolerant and sexist country in the world.

Saturday, November 1, 2014

All muslims are the same! They all approve of sexist and racist sharia


So why doesn't BBC's British born muslim migrant (she grew up in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan after her migrant mother had delivered her in UK) and sharia presenter Mishail Husain admit that she is against girls and women's Human Rights?





Klevius sex tutorial: Roger Moore, Bill Cosby - and a 7-year Swedish girl accused by her female principal for causing the (muslim?)* boys to rape her at school


* It happened in Malmoe (where Mohammed is the most common name among boys and where Jews are escaping muslim hate criminals) in a muslim dominated school district.And even non-muslims

Rapetivism








According to Sir Roger Moore's friend Oxford-educated Princess Badiya (from Jordan), one of the co-founders of the Oxonian Society: 'The doctrine of islam counsels respect and peace with other faiths as well as an embracing of diversity.' Klevius comment: Except for this senseless majestic lie it should also be mentioned that Jordan and the Gulf states are ranked number one in terms of the number of  Islamic State fighters coming from those countries, followed by Africa and then Europe where UK is the number one exporter'of militant islamofascism.


Bill Cosby: 'We should all be more like Muslims. I’m a Christian. But Muslims are misunderstood. Intentionally misunderstood. We should all be more like them. They make sense, especially with their children. There is no other group like the Black Muslims, who put so much effort into teaching children the right things, they don’t smoke, they don’t drink or overindulge in alcohol, they protect their women, they command respect. And what do these other people do? They complain about them, they criticize them. We’d be a better world if we emulated them. We don’t have to become black muslims, but we can embrace the things that work.

Klevius comment: However, according to Barbara Bowman and many other women, Bill Cosby is a gangster who doesn't hesitate to drug his victims for the purpose of raping them. So islam's Koranic rapetivism slogan 'what your right hand possesses' seems already to have been incorporated in Bill Cosby's tragicomic life formula. Barbara Bowman was only 17 when Bill Cosby allegedly drugged her for rape.


Sir Roger Moore, although also extremely sexist, seems to have a more cautious approach to rapetivism. He allegedly only repeatedly fondled and grouped his inexperienced young victim Debbie Newsome in a Bond-like fashion to get her into the bed including notes, champagne, jewelery etc.


How many Swedish girls have got their lives ruined because of politically correct islam support?



 2004 Klevius launched The Swedish girl problem web page.


 A 2014 incident from the top of the islamofascist Swedish iceberg

In a muslim dominated Swedish public school in Malmoe a 7-year old girl gets raped because she had make up and painted lips. The female principal's first reaction was to ask the poor child victim if she had painted her lips and danced before she was raped.



A 2014 incident from the top of the islamofascist iceberg in US


 A Marine Corps father, Kevin Wood, has been banned from his daughter’s school after he complained about her homework assignment on islam.

His 11th grade daughter was asked to write an essay about islam’s five pillars, Mecca and Mohammed at La Plata High School in Maryland.

He argued that students can’t study Christianity in schools “but we can force-feed our kids Islam.”

Wood asked the school to give his daughter an alternate assignment, but officials refused and defended the subject matter.

“We’re not teaching religion, we’re teaching world history,” school spokesperson Katie O’Malley-Simpson said.

Part of those world history studies involves the economics of a region and part of that is the religion which relates to the economy of that part of the world. In the Middle East, Islam is the only religion and it contributes greatly to the economics of the region.”

Charles County Board of Education member Jennifer Abell: “The particular unit in question at La Plata High School is on the formation of Middle Eastern empires in which students learned the basic concepts of the islamic faith and how it, along with politics, culture, economics and geography, contributed to the development of the Middle East.

To ensure the 'safety of students and staff' at the school against this islamophobe, the school administration placed a No Trespass Order on this US defending parent.

Klevius comment: History doesn't know about any Mohammed. He is entirely a mythological construction kept alive by islamist clerics. So what does he or the five pillars have to do with history and economics? What they should have taught their students is that islam is an evil parasitic racist and sexist ideology that committed genocides and enslavement of hundreds of millions. And that it is today the main threat against equality in accordance with Human Rights.


Public School Textbook are Filled With muslim Bias?

A world history textbook being used in Florida public schools is raising serious concerns over its alleged Islamic bias. The textbook, used in ninth grade Advanced Placement classes in Brevard County for the past three years, is now under review by the school board.

New Proposal Could Bar Christians From San Antonio City Council

The book contains an entire chapter devoted to “Muslim Civilizations.” Sean Hannity noted that it has zero chapters on Christianity or Judaism. The chapter teaches about the Prophet Muhammad and how he became God’s messenger. It even describes jihad as a “holy war to defend Islam […] much like the Crusades to defend Christianity.”

Fox News Radio’s Todd Starnes has obtained a copy of the textbook. He told Hannity, “Through the entire chapter, Sean, Islam is defended. They talk about how wonderful Islam is to women. I mean, you’d think that they were having Victoria’s Secret stores over there.”

Starnes said the book attempts to re-write history by likening bad things in Christianity’s history to a “massacre,” but for Islam it’s referred to as an “occupation.”

Klevius comment: Islam is so evil that it has to be protected from scrutiny at whatever cost. And the reason there are so many muslims and that most of them are living in violent and backward communities, is because islam is based on one way rapetivism, i.e. reproducing as many muslims as possible while not allowing muslims to abandon islam.


Here's what Klevius wrote


Saturday, September 27, 2008

Heterosexual attraction & sex segregation in islam

Quote of the day (Edmondo de Amicis visiting islamic Morocco some 100 yrs ago): "She appeared sad. Perhaps the reason was that her husband's fourth wife, a recently arrived young 14 yr old girl in his harem, had triumphed over her in a way that was clearly reflected in her husband's indifference." Klevius comment: Heterosexual attraction (HSA) combined with sex segregation is often disastrous for human relations! Only with full access to respective social spheres, as well as full awareness of the HSA discrepancy between the sexes (i.e. what most feminists deny) an open de-sex segregated interaction is possible' HSA per se doesn't presuppose/determine sex of any kind - neither does women "need a normal penis several times" (S. Freud's notorious formula) nor does a male need to rape. What could the older wife possibly offer her husband behind an impenetrable wall of sex segregation when her physical attraction didn't work anymore? Only islam was satisfied because she had to continue her inescapable (Sharia & apostasy ban) fate of fostering new islamists!