The Saudi Fuhrer of Saudi based islamofascist OIC

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Mrs Theresa May digging a racist/sexist "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff

Sayeeda Warsi like all sharia muslims is against basic Human Rights

Theresa May is for sharia and EU - but against EU's Human Rights Court which condemns sharia

Klevius is probably now the world's foremost expert on sex segregation (sad isn't it), and islam (the worst cime ever) is the foremost expression of sex segregation. By 'islam' Klevius means the same as true sharia supporting (and therefore against the most basic of Human Rights) muslims.

British muslim jihadists: Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo (who murdered Le

Tuesday, December 29, 2015

So called British Broadcasting Company (aka BBC) blinks 1400 years of islamic sex slavery - but eagerly jumps on Japanese war crimes similar to those committed by UK, France, US, and others*

* Here's just a brief snapshot from WW2 1944:

General Alphonse Juin before a battle against Germans in WW2 to his (muslim?) soldiers: "For fifty hours you will be the absolute masters of what you will find beyond the enemy. Nobody will punish you for what you will do, nobody will ask you about what you will get up". His Goumiers then raped and assaulted at least 2000 girls/women in a short period of time while also murdering some 800 civilian men.


And today in Britain adherents to the worst sex slavery ideology ever are considered more vulnerable than others - meaning someone raping a muslim will get a harder sentence than a muslim raping a non-muslim!


 

The two evil caliphates and their evil caliphs


The world's biggest* organization, OIC, is muslim - as is the world's main military problem, IS!

* Although UN consists of more nations OIC is much more effective precisely because of its evil anti Human Rights approach which constitutes its main allure for dictators and other scumbags .

 These two evil muslims below right now represent the absolute majority of the world's practicing muslims. They both consider the most basic of Human Rights as "crimes against islam". Yet stating this indisputable fact makes Klevius an "islamophobe"!? So when the British socialist leader Jeremy Corbyn today wanted to say something that everyone in the British Parliament had to agree with him about, he consequently defended his anti war position with the "risk of creating more islamophobia".


al-Saud and al-Baghdadi



 So called British Broadcasting Company (aka BBC)  makes a huge number of Japanese soldiers in WW2 using "comfort women". Compare this to islam's 1400 years of sex slavery that so called BBC has never seriously addressed!

However, so called British Broadcasting Company (aka BBC ) makes no number at all about the world's by far worst and longest lasting sex slave nation, the Umma of islam. And this despite, or perhaps because, the so calle "British" Broad Casting Company is now anchored in the very center of islam, i.e. Mideast.

Underlying so called BBC's judgmental campaign against Japanese is not only a deep racist attitude against everything Japanese but perhaps even more so so called BBC's poorly hidden efforts to veil islamic atrocities by pointing to something else.

Btw dear reader, how many intellectually high quality independent non political and non religious sources do you really possess except for Klevius?

Sunday, December 27, 2015

The peanut man Jimmy Carter signs his lifetime of ignorance(?!) about Human Rights and sharia

.


Somehow Jimmy Carter now manages to do what no real muslims, incl. their "prophet" Muhammad and their world organization OIC, have ever done - making islam compatible with Human Rights.






Jimmy Carter: The truth is that male religious leaders have had - and still have - an option to interpret holy teachings either to exalt or subjugate women. They have, for their own selfish ends, overwhelmingly chosen the latter. Their continuing choice provides the foundation or justification for much of the pervasive persecution and abuse of women throughout the world. This is in clear violation not just of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights but also the teachings of Jesus Christ, the Apostle Paul, Moses and the prophets, Muhammad, and founders of other great religions - all of whom have called for proper and equitable treatment of all the children of God. It is time we had the courage to challenge these views."

 Klevius: No, now it's the time to challenge Jimmy Carter's extremely dangerous view, i.e. that following Muhammad is ok! "The children of God" for Muhammad following muslims means the the children of Allah, i.e. pure racism and sexism. And the only "respect" Muhammad paid to girls/women was as physical and cultural reproducers of as many muslim males as possible and as sex slaves.

And when it comes to sex apartheid in ALL forms of mainstream islam there is no way to avoid it without killing islam and its "prophet" in the process. This is very clear from the Saudi based and steered OIC declaration on islamic "human rights".



Why is Jimmy Carter defending a racist/sexist "prophet" and his ideology that started by slaughtering all the Jews in Medina.



First the Jews murdered Jesus and then the muslims murdered the Jews - no wonder religion seems to be the problem. Or do you really think that without Judaic religions there would still be the same amount of victims on top of other victims?! In other words, do you, for example, really think the Germans had murdered equally many without Nationalsocialism (aka Nazism)?


The ill-posed approach to why Mideastern slave and slaughtering religions emerged

When Klevius as a teenager studied the emergence of the weird "first mover" thinking he realized that it was a local, not general, phenomenon among cultures. All Atheist ("pagan", "polytheist" etc), i.e. not "monotheist" cultures (and not contaminated with "monotheisms") avoided this stupid question by asserting an infinite world (see Klevius on Origin of Universe). Whatever was "created" came out of something already existing. The Universe has no boundaries!



Having realized this simple fact Klevius concluded there must be a deliberately racist basis fpr all "monotheisms".

And for you really dumb out there: Although Human Rights consider all humans as equals that doesn't mean that one can't love some people more than others and even hate some people while respecting their basic Human Rights and the law. And dude, yes there are a lot of so called positive Human Rights that have nothing to do to with the negative basic Human Rights we here deal with.

Thursday, December 24, 2015

The little child in UK's Parliament that pointed to the biggest scandal ever since king John


 A miserable xmas break in the British parliament - and a new low mark in British history

Islam is naked said the little child peer representing more than half of the views of non-muslim (incl. so called "cultural muslim") Brits!

One brave peer, Lord Pearson, dared to reveal his "islamophobia" in full just before the Yule break. He said what couldn't be said because it's "blasphemy" according to sharia: "Islam is the problem"!

Result? Everyone either jumped on him or kept silent!

Lord Pearson: “Where there is contradiction in the Qur’an, its later, more violent verses outweigh its admirably peaceful early texts.”

Lord Ahmad (the muslim who killed a person while allegedly SMSing while driving and who was sentenced to some 12 days while a non-muslim got 12 years today for similar carelessness in traffic ): “Together with some Qur’anic scholars I have written a short summary of Islam which I will send to him and we are asking the Guardian (sic) newspaper to hold an open debate as to its accuracy.

Klevius: This sharia muslim who threatened England with ten thousand street jihadis if an islam critic was allowed to enter Britain is writing something about islam for non-muslim Brits! No wonder it will be short - the Koran stripped from its racist/sexist content can't cover many pages. 

Lord Pearson: “Given the seriousness of our domestic situation couldn’t the Government itself sponsor a council of our Muslim leaders in which they could clarify the modern meaning of their religion and cast the extremists out of Islam?”

Lord Ahmad (: “I look forward to receiving the noble Lord’s summary of the great religion of Islam Perhaps in his reflection he would have also noted that with the exception of one verse in the Holy Qur’an, every verse in the holy Qur’an starts with the words ‘In the name of God, the gracious most merciful’, which underlines the true sentiments and principle of that religion.”

Klevius:  The oldest parts of the Koran are all Jewish-Christian! The true original sentiments and principle of that so called religion called islam is pure racism. In accordance with this basic tenet "the gracious most merciful" in islam simply means those muslims who are approved of by whom happens to be the approver.

Lord Lamont: "A council of Muslim leaders is totally inappropriate”.

Klevius: Indeed! Just like ten thousand jihadis. The whole idea of islam is as a suitable tool for "conquest" (jihad) and parasitism in whatever location or circumstance that happens to be at hands.

Baroness Mobarik: “Such a debate as he advocates could be divisive and further exacerbate the current rise in Islamophobia.

Klevius: Such a "debate" as she advocates has long since proved divisive and further exacerbate the current rise in islamofascist radicalization.

Baroness Mobarik: “I, like the vast majority of the 1.6 billion Muslims around the world, was taught that peace, compassion and obeying the law of the land are fundamental. To me, that’s the nature of Islam.”

Klevius: "The vast majority of the 1.6 billion muslims" (incl. not practising "muslims") are kept in deep ignorance about Human Rights - and the rest are openly racist and sexist islamofascist supporters!


Here's Wikipedia's description of this disgusting* sharia muslim whom Tony Blair appointed a peer.


* What here qualifies as 'disgusting' includes Human Rights violating sharia plus the list below.

In December 2001, Ahmed claimed that his phone had been tapped by the government because of his opposition to its intervention in Afghanistan. He claimed he had a heated conversation with Foreign Office minister Denis MacShane, during which MacShane claimed to have transcripts of Ahmed's private conversations. The government denied that Ahmed was under surveillance, and MacShane said that his remarks had been misinterpreted.[28]

In 2002, Ahmed was accused by campaign group Baby Milk Action of changing his position on Nestlé's sale of baby milk in Pakistan at a time when he was negotiating a paid advisory role with the company.[29] He subsequently did become a consultant.[30]

On 25 July 2005, Ahmed, while interviewing with Robert Siegel on National Public Radio, said that the suicide bombers of 7/7 had an "identity crisis" and that "unfortunately, our imams and mosques have not been able to communicate the true message of Islam in the language that these young people can understand."[31] Christopher Orlet of The American Spectator did not agree with Ahmed's "identity crisis". He said, "That's not an identity crisis, Lord Ahmed, that's religious psychopathy. That's a bloodthirstiness that makes Dracula look like a teetotaler."[32] Ahmed did acknowledge, "the community leaders and religious leaders, who have kept very close contacts with South Asia and the Middle East rather than keeping a good contact with the British society where we live."[31]

On 30 November 2006, the New Statesman reported a claim by fellow Muslim and Labour parliamentarian Shahid Malik that Ahmed had campaigned against him during the Dewsbury election in 2005. He alleged that Ahmed instead backed Sayeeda Warsi, vice-chair of the Conservative Party, the daughter of a personal friend. According to the New Statesman's report, Warsi "welcomed Lord Ahmed's support". The New Statesman also printed Ahmed's refutation, saying "I never told any constituent of Dewsbury to vote for the Tories"[33]

On 3 February 2009, Melanie Phillips, a newspaper columnist, claimed that Ahmed had threatened to mobilise 10,000 Muslims to prevent anti-Islamist Dutch MP Geert Wilders from entering the House of Lords to speak at a screening of the film Fitna. Wilders had been invited by a peer to debate issues of social inclusion.[34] This claim was later denied by Ahmed, but the House of Lords authorities had determined to provide adequate security, if necessary. In the event, the film Fitna was broadcast as planned, but Wilders was denied entry to the UK, thus leading many commentators to deplore the action by the Home Secretary Jacqui Smith as appeasement.[35][36]
Fatal road crash and subsequent jail sentence

On 25 December 2007, Ahmed was involved in a crash on the M1 motorway near Rotherham in which Martin Gombar, 28, was killed. Gombar's car had been involved in a crash and he had left it in the outer lane. Apparently trying to return to his vehicle from the hard shoulder he was hit by Ahmed, who was driving his Jaguar X-Type. Ahmed's wife and mother, who were passengers in the car, also received minor injuries.[37]

On 1 December 2008, Ahmed appeared at Sheffield Magistrates' Court in connection with a charge of dangerous driving. Ahmed admitted sending and receiving five text messages on his phone while driving two minutes before the crash, and pleaded guilty to the charge before him. He was banned from driving until his sentencing. On 22 December, Sheffield Magistrates' Court referred the case for sentencing at the Crown Court on 19 January due to its "aggravating features".[38] This was later put back until 25 February.[39] Ahmed was sentenced to 12 weeks in prison by the presiding judge, Mr Justice Wilkie, which meant he would serve six actual weeks in jail, and he was disqualified from driving for 12 months.[40][41]

On 12 March 2009 Ahmed was freed by the Court of Appeal. Lady Justice Hallett said it was important to state that Ahmed's offence was one of dangerous driving, not of causing death by dangerous driving. Hallett said that there was "little or nothing" Ahmed could have done to avoid the collision and that after being knocked unconscious, he had come to and "risked his life trying to flag down other vehicles to stop them colliding with the Audi or his car". She said that while his prison sentence had been justified, the court had been persuaded it could now take an "exceptional" course and suspend the sentence for 12 months.[42] He was freed just 16 days into his sentence.[43]

In subsequent interviews, Ahmed has incorrectly stated that he has no criminal record and that his sentence was overturned.[44][45]
Bounty allegation

A Pakistani newspaper, The Express Tribune, alleged that Ahmed said "If the US can announce a reward of $10 million for the captor of Hafiz Saeed, I can announce a bounty of ₤10 million on President Obama and his predecessor George Bush", at a business meeting in Haripur, Pakistan, on 15 April 2012.[46] On learning of these allegations, the Labour Party immediately suspended Ahmed pending a formal investigation.[47] He later responded by stating "I'm shocked and horrified that this whole story could be just made up of lies...." Ahmed went on to say that he was not issuing a bounty but rather calls for the prosecution of George W. Bush and Tony Blair due to the "war crimes committed in Iraq and Afghanistan" in what he considers to be "illegal wars".[48]

Video footage of the meeting, released on 18 April, showed that Ahmed had been misquoted and instead had said, "Even if I have to beg I am willing to raise and offer £10 million so that George W Bush and Tony Blair can be brought to the International Court of Justice on war crimes charges."[49] The same day, The Express Tribune offered a "clarification" that it had "erroneously reported" Ahmed's statement and that their reporter had incorrectly cited the name of Obama. The article stated that the newspaper "deeply regretted" its mistake.[50] His suspension was later revoked on 25 June 2012.[51]
Malala accusation

In November 2012 Ahmed claimed that the attempted assassination of Malala Yousafzai might have been carried out by unnamed official elements in Pakistan as part of an effort to discredit the Taliban. He subsequently accepted that he gave the speech whilst having "no idea what happened" and that this was not the case.[52]
Jewish conspiracy comments

On 14 March 2013, The Times newspaper in London revealed that Ahmed had blamed a Jewish conspiracy for his driving conviction. In an interview given in Urdu, broadcast on a Pakistani television channel in April 2012, the peer claimed that he was jailed because of pressure on the courts by Jewish owned media: "My case became more critical because I went to Gaza to support Palestinians. My Jewish friends who own newspapers and TV channels opposed this." He also alluded to further Jewish involvement regarding the judge, claiming that Mr Justice Wilkie was specifically selected to judge his case having previously been appointed to the high court after helping a "Jewish colleague" of former Labour prime minister Tony Blair during an important case. The Times pointed out that neither of these claims about the judge were factually correct.[53][54]

Reactions were negative. Katie Wheatley, a criminal law expert, said that if Ahmed had made such claims in Britain he could have faced prosecution for a hate crime.[53] The Labour party immediately suspended him, saying it "deplores and does not tolerate any sort of racism or anti-Semitism." Jewish organisations condemned the comments, with the Board of Deputies of British Jews, saying, "We are appalled by Lord Ahmed's alleged comments which recall the worst Jewish conspiracy theories."[54] In contrast, the chairman of the UK-based Kashmir Watch International was reported by The Nation, an English-language Pakistani paper, as saying, "Lord Ahmed has, in fact, been made the target of a deep-rooted vendetta by the rivals – mostly the Jews lobby for his "crime" of exposing the increased anti-Muslim approach and policies of the Jews including their backed British media."[55]

Ahmed's initial response was that he had no recollection of making the comments and that he would have to examine the transcripts with his solicitors.[53] On 18 March he resigned from the Joseph Interfaith Foundation as a result of the allegations.[27] At about the same time, he ceased to be a member of the International Expert Team of the Institute Research of Genocide, Canada.[56]

Among the pieces written in the immediate aftermath of the revelation was one by Mehdi Hasan in The Huffington Post which claimed that antisemitism within some otherwise well-integrated sections of the British Muslim community was commonplace.[57] In the 28 March interview with Ahmed resulting from this article, Ahmed apologised, describing his comments as "completely unacceptable" and the product of a "twisted mind". He could not explain why he had made the comments.[58]

His appearance before Labour's National Executive Committee to determine whether his suspension should be lifted or whether he should be expelled was due to take place on 15 May.[59] On 9 May it was reported that he was considering preempting the hearing by leaving the Labour party[60] and on 13 May he resigned from the Labour party.[25] In his letter of resignation he again stated that he has no recollection of the interview, that The Times had failed to provide the footage in order for it to be forensically examined and, consequently, that he was unable to get a fair hearing. He alleged that the video was deliberately doctored, perhaps by "elements in Pakistan who bears [sic] grudge against me".[26]
Family life

Ahmed lives in Rotherham where some of UK's worst muslim child sex scandals surfaced.


Klevius wrote:

From Magna Carta in 1215 to Human Rights in 1948


Magna Carta Libertatum is the first rudimentary effort in a long struggle towards the final 1948 Human Rights declaration which PM David Cameron now again seems to betray by giving in for Human Rights violating sharia.



Back in 1215 Magna Carta (the first predecessor to Human Rights) was produced to stifle traitor King John's effort to islamize Britian. Compare this to the  British PM Cameron's attacks on Human Rights while seemingly proposing Britain as the center of islamofascism outside Mideast (beginning with London sharia finance).



King John the Traitor, PM David Cameron and the islamofascist "king" Abdullah who pretended to be "reformist" while steering the country in an even more intolerant direction by new sharia inspired laws by early 2014 (e.g. equalizing Human Rights, Secularism and Atheism with "terrorism" and due penalties - compare Raif Badawi and others).

King John in the early 13th century sent envoys to Mohammed al-Nâsir asking for his help. In return King John offered to convert to Islam and turn England into a muslim state. The muslim jihadist Mohammed al-Nâsir's view on King John: "I never read or heard that any king possessing such a prosperous kingdom subject and obedient to him, would voluntarily ... make tributary a country that is free, by giving to a stranger that which is his own ... conquered, as it were, without a wound. I have rather read and heard from many that they would procure liberty for themselves at the expense of streams of blood, which is a praiseworthy action; but now I hear that your wretched lord, a sloth and a coward, who is even worse than nothing, wishes from a free man to become a slave, who is the most miserable of all human beings." Mohammed al-Nâsir concluded by wondering aloud why the English allowed such a man to lord over them — they must, he said, be very servile and soft.


It's the original evilness* of islam that makes it so vulnerable for criticism that it needs to be protected by sharia compliant so called blasphemy laws (in the West called "hate speech" laws).



* For a starter islam's incompatibility with Human Rights as proved by OIC's sharia declaration in UN.



So what about muslim friends?


Immediately face your muslim friend with the question whether s/he supports Human Rights violating sharia or Human Rights equality? Or do you fear hearing the truth?

Klevius proposes that every muslim is invited to carefully be taught about Magna Carta and Human Rights and how sharia violates the most basic of Human Rights, i.e. the universal equality principle that makes sexism and racism (and due hate) redundant (Klevius 1992). This should then be followed up with the simple question: Do you want equality or Human Rights violating sharia? And those who choose sharia instead of Human Rights (i.e. the real muslims) ought to train themselves in looking at this picture without bursting into violence etc.

The war between muslims and Jews started when Muhammad slaughtered all the Jews in Medina. However, what made this war special was muslims' claim to be the only true branch of Judaism.

 Albert Einstein: "For me the unaltered Jewish religion like all other religions is an incarnation of the most primitive superstitions.


 Although the majority of the world's population is Atheist, religious dogma leading to racism, sexism and hatred is still allowed to be exempted from Human Rights equality logic.



 Klevius wrote:

Monday, April 16, 2012


In Klevius series muslims chasing muslims:


UK's first muslim peer Nazir Ahmed offers bounty for the capture of Obama

Nazir Ahmed, equalizes muslim born Mr X "president" with the muslim terrorist leader Hafiz Saeed who was behind the islamic mass murdering in Mumbai where 166 died.

Nazir Ahmed from Pakistan but now appointed muslim peer in UK (down to the right behind the JIHAD text on Klevius' classic Mr X pic) has allegedly offered a 10 million Pound bounty for the capture of the muslim born Mr X "president". Ahmed, who killed a person while SMSing in his car and who uses to threaten Bris with tens of thousands of jihadists if he doesn't get what he wants, is a good friend of an other muslim, UK PM's right hand Sayeeda Warsi, also from Pakistan, who uses to call other muslims "idiots" (down to the right below Nazir Ahmed on the Mr X pic). She has been admired among muslims and others for calling the truth about islamic atrocities "islamophobia".

Muslim Nazir Ahmed reportedly said: “'If the USA can announce a reward of US$ 10 million for the (capture) of Hafiz Saeed, I can announce a bounty of 10 million Pound (for the capture of) President Obama...”






.





This is Nazir Ahmed's friend in the British House of Lords. An other PC appointed muslim.












 
and here














Klevius question: When should the black racist troll "Ms Lucy Black" be arrested? She who wrote the postings below when the two girls on the pic (Samantha Sykes and Kim Frank) were probably jihad-murdered, i.e. islamic/muslim hate crimes. But nothing happens but silence and cover up. Instead the whole islamofascist propaganda apparatus is full of a Norwegian lone lunatic who did what the Black Panthers and other racist terrorist groups have done for years.





.





 

Saturday, December 12, 2015

Rape accused and sharia hate spreading Saudi islamofascist dictator family's "prince" Alwaleed bin Talal is a disgrace to civilized* non-muslim - and probably to some muslims too!


* Meaning civilized people who believe in Universal Human Rights equality - not sharia!

Ban him and his rape yacht wherever it shows up outside his islamofascist wahhabist/salafist caliphate homeland!


Who spread this extreme misinformation about islam that has  caused such a worldwide suffering and the death of these underage girls?


and who keeps supporting this disgusting sharia islam? You're certainly a disgrace to the world!



BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain, who was raised in Saudi Arabia, probably approves of Alwaleed bin Talal - just a qualified guess from Klevius side, not an accusation of any kind.


 Haven't we reached the tipping point of supporting islamofascism long since, people?! Only a single word stays between you seeing what's going on or being blindfolded: "islamophobia".


Alwaleed Bin Talal Bin Abdulaziz Alsaud awarded in Sudan by war criminal "president" Omar Bashir who is arrested in his absence by the International Criminal Court in The Hague for crimes against humanity (e.g. in Darfur etc). Even Kenya has ordered arrest of this muslim scumbag who here hugs and kisses his beloved Saudi supporter the muslim Billionaire scumbag rape accused hatemonger Alwaleed bin Talal.

Why isn't this scumbag Saudi muslim banned from every civilized country?!

This Saudi islamofascist tells Americans who wil and who will not become president in the US. What do Americans really think about it? No, Hillary, I didn't ask for your opinion this time.



















The disgusting racist/sexist Sharia boosting muslim islamist tycoon Alwaleed bin Talal bin Abdul Aziz al-Saud

 A main contributor to racist/sexist sharia hatred is the rape accused Saudi "prince" Alwaleed bin Talal (who btw didn't want to reveal his DNA for the court) who has eagerly helped the Saudi dictator family to spread the disgusting and hateful islamic racist/sexist propaganda not only to Universities etc but also to schools, streets, community centers, prisons etc






Klevius wrote:

Monday, December 12, 2011


Missed by Google News: Alwaleed bin Talal's rape/DNA case and the last anti-Sharia presidential candidate! Why? Islam propaganda of course.

A greedy Wall Street criminal is bad enough. So what about a greedy Wall Street thug who on top of it uses the money to impose hate mongering islamofascist Sharia?!

These two "Westernized" (with "Western" oil tech money) muslim thugs show many similarities although one of them is now waiting to be executed  by islamic Sharia and the other is fulfilling the original goal of islam, i.e. to rob infidels of their money and use it to impose that very same Sharia racism/sexism.

Alwaleed bin Talal, a nephew of the world's worst dictator, Saudi "king" Abdullah, doesn't want to reveal his DNA to be compared to semen found on a rape victim who said he did it.






Never forget: Islamic Sharia (OIC) is the extreme opposite to Human Rights!


The Saudi monster to the left of Saif al Islam, Alwaleed bin Talal, who works hard to undermine Human Rights while supporting racist/sexist OIC/Sharia, disguises himself in a veil of "business" (flipping/wasting/OIC-Sharia-agitating with oil money) and "charity" (the old Muslim Brotherhood Sharia trick with "Western" oil and welfare money) and buys cheap points on "reforms" for Arab women (compare the muslim woman who got Nobel's peace prize for advocating in favor of letting muslim women remove their face cover - what a huge "reform" for muslim women!). Fact is that precisely because of him being part of the Saudi dictator family he is exempted from the scrutiny of the islamic Sharia police and can lead the same "Western" life in Saudi Arabia as what he is allowed to (because of "Western" Human Rights) when he is in the "West" (which is most of the time).


Why this complete silence about the Spanish court's hunt for Alwaleed bin Talal's DNA to compare it with semen found on a rape victim?!









While poll leading ant-Sharia Newt Gingrich's name has been constantly missing in Google's quick search column poll lagging pro-Sharia Rick Perry has been there all the time! Also note that Google's top news is given to the Arab League islamofascists and their effort to smear the last defender of US against islam, the worst hate crime ever!

Update: After this posting Gingrich appeared on Google again together with the usual smear (Klevius doesn't propose any connection though).























Monday, December 05, 2011


How dumb and misled (?!) by Alwaleed & CO could a NATO top senior (S. Gass) possibly be about islamofascist Sharia and women's rights?!

These extremely intolerant  muslim scumbags are running around spreading islamofascist Sharia (i.e. violating Human Rights) under the title "tolerance" etc.!

The murdering and torturing islamofascist Saudi dictator family (don't let their oil wealth blind you) seems to be behind much of the distorted, misleading or suppressed "information" on islam that media people, politicians, educators etc vomit upon us on a daily basis. And two of its main scumbags are "king" Abdullah (who ordered the occupation, torture and killings in Bahrain as well as elsewhere incl. at home) of and his nephew Alwaleed bin Talal (the rape accused islamist Wall Street monster who has never made a single day of ccent work but tries to spread islamofascist Sharia by buying into media and education etc by the help of Western oil money).

Simon Lawrance Gass, a British diplomat and the current NATO Senior Civilian Representative in Afghanistan: "The Afgan government will esure women's rights"

Klevius comment: No, dude, it will not!Why not? Because in islam women have no real Human Rights. This is at the heart of OIC's notorious decision to abandon Universal Human Rights and replace them with islamofascist Sharia in UN (which, btw, was created to defend ALL of us against such fascisms).











Wikipedia's utter PC nonsense about women's rights in islam

Status of women under Islamic law prior to the 19th century

Islamic law grants women some legal rights they did not have under Western legal systems until the 19th and 20th centuries.[195] Noah Feldman, a Harvard University law professor, has noted:

Status of women under Islamic law since the 19th century

At this point in history the aforementioned exploration of freedom is no longer true — that is to say that whilst it is arguable that women had more extensive legal rights under Islamic law than they did under Western legal systems in the past, it is no longer true today.


Klevius correction: Would you believe this utter nonsense! This must be written by an islamofascist imam in desperation after having realized islam's miserable historical records (i.e. the, without a doubt, single worst ideological crime ever throughout 1400 years)!

An extremely childish and self-righteous tone is set by "islamic law grants women some legal rights they did not have under Western legal systems until the 19th and 20th centuries". This is of course utter nonsense and reflects
a will to whitewash evil islamofascism by trying to smear the development that stopped slavery and created the most powerful moral thought ever, i.e. what later on became the freedom part of the 1948 Universal Human Rights Declaration.

This tendentious and charlatan childish babble is then repeated as "whilst it is arguable that women had more extensive legal rights under islamic law than they did under Western legal systems in the past" under the title "Status of women under islamic law since the 19th century" is extremely polemic, not to say simply childish. Moreover, the statement doesn't contain even a trace of truth. There were never such things as "Western" or "islamic" legal "systems". And before Romans erred to Christianity their women were much freer than in any islamic society much later on. And whereas "Western" women, despite an oppressing Judaic-Christian tradition, easily managed to steer everthing from nations to armies, islam has always shown its impotency when it comes to women's rights.

Btw, the fictitious Khadija (the fictitious Mohammed's first wife who, at 40+, was a wealthy widow but already out of heterosexual attraction and child-bearing age) lost much of her power when obeying Mohammed's order to convert to islam!

So whatever you do, don't support Wikimedia before you're sure it's clean from evil islam propaganda!




Saturday, December 03, 2011


Did islam kill Michael Jackson too?

Islam is a murderous racist/sexist ideology that threatens all muslims

A muslim who stumbled on the "sword of islam" and now begs for Human Rights to resque him from islamic Sharia














Naive Michael Jackson's "friendship" with Alwaleed bin Talal al Saud (a member of the muslim Saudi dictator family) and islam turned disastrous when he realized he couldn't make the planned world tour that was aimed to complete his "conversion" to islam and satisfying financial and cultural expectations.


Klevius comment: A good guess is that after MJ's disastrous child abuse publicity , due trial (2005) and mounting financial problems (incl. debt to Alwaleed bin Talal al Saud) the idea was that by converting to islam MJ could be "reborn" clean and at the same time islam could take the honor of it (among Jackson fans etc) while Alwaleed bin Talal al Saud could get "his" (oil)money back and even gain on the affair. Just dig into the different enterprises and companies involved and you'll end up with this scumbag Alwaleed bin Talal al Saud and other Arab dictator associates. Just as if you dig into media corporations for trailing evil Arab oilislam influence explaining why open islamofascism gets no real criticism in media but instead is supported and advertised in true Nazi-Goebbel style!

Friday, December 11, 2015

The immoral religious inclusion of the immoral keeps the immoral immoral


Does the love for a racist hater (he hated "whites") with limited mental capacities (IQ 78) further increase proportionally due to the progress of his Parkinson's disease? BBC's in-house moral moron cleric, Giles Fraser, seems to think so when he today praised Cassius Clay (named Muhammad Ali by US worst hate organization, Nation of Islam) more than Jesus.

Cassius Clay's (aka Muhammad Ali) troubling timeline from a young racist supremacist via Saudi Sunni islam to old and sick sufi "muslim"*.

* Sufism is according to Saudi Sunni clerics "irreconcilable with true islam and corrupting modern day islam.


1964  Cassius Clay (aka Muhammad Ali) was classified as a 1-Y military after two mental tests found his IQ was only 78.

1967, Cassius Clay (aka Muhammad Ali) refused to be conscripted into the U.S. military, citing his "religious beliefs".

1975 he converted from the racist black supremacist Nation of Islam sect to Saudi Sunni islam after visiting Saudi Arabia. 

1980 he was again badly beaten in the ring to an extent that most probably sealed his Parkinson future.



1983 he was diagnosed with Parkinson's disease - most probably because of all the punches he had received, not the least against Larry Holmes in one of the most uneven high ranking boxing matches ever. The referee should have stopped the match long before - but he didn't. Why?

2005, when his disease had long since turned him into a wreck, he "embraced spiritual practices" of Sufi "islam".





Tyson Fury defends his homophobia with religion and refers to the Pope's homophobia.










Giles Fraser, a priest of the Church of England, doesn't at all share the immoral views of Anglican Church leader Chris Sugden - but is happy to work together with him "cause it’s just a family row".



Klevius: You've got a big family. Does this family also include hate mongers such as Nation of Islam, Saudi islamofascists etc Human Rights violating sharia muslims? Why not, after all, they are all "religious" aren't they.


Anglican Church leader Chris Sugden preaching homophobia - in a radical homophobic mosque.
Q: But it doesn’t sound like you and Chris Sugden (see pic above from approxim. the same time as this interview) are both in the same church, that one or other of you is going to have to go your separate ways.

Giles Fraser: No, no, no. Tony Blair didn’t invent the Big Church, the Big Tent, the Church of England invented the Big Tent. We are a Big Tent and the idea that Canon Sugden and I – and we actually agree on a number of other issues, we don’t agree on this issue but we agree on other things, it is uncomfortable, we row a lot but it’s a family row, I have to tell you it’s a family row and that sort of nature of us as a family, perhaps that’s why it’s so bitter, is because it’s a family row. So yes, we passionately disagree upon this issue but actually I don't think that we inevitably have to split up.

Klevius: Do any these guys belong to the "family" as well?

Wednesday, December 9, 2015

Islam returns to the West as a looser - for the third* time? And its victims cry while its accomplices call it "a great religion"...


* 1 Andalusia, 2 Ottoman, 3 Saudi based and steered OIC and its sharia declaration in UN (the so called Cairo declaration on "human rights" in islam). OIC pretends to be "non-violent" while its Saudi host custodian (OIC's Fuhrer is the Saudi islamofascist Iyad Madani - see pic below) oil money to spread Salafist/Wahhabist jihadism around the world and where it suits the interests of the Saudi dictator family.

Desperate "defense" of muslims: "They're 1.6 billions and most of them are peaceful - and my pal's a muslim!" Klevius: Is s/he really - a true sharia* muslim?! Then stop dealing with her/him and report her/him to authorities interested in sharia "radicalization".



* I.e. someone who is or supports the islamic violations of the most basic of Human Rights inscribed in a UN declaration 1948 for the purpose of hindering the spread of precisely such kind of ideologies.

"Non-violent" "moderate" muslims in the West and their Western accomplices


Klevius is your by far best source to the understanding of islam. Why? Simply because Klevius is still the only one (sad isn't it) to address the core issues: Heterosexual attraction and reproduction used for the purpose of parasitic* and racist "conquest".
* You know what 'parasitic' means, don't you! I.e. unlike symbiotic, it doesn't benefit the host.



Pamela Geller (a Jew who would have been slaughtered by islam's "prophet" in Medina if she had been around. On May 4 of this year, Trump tweeted: “The U.S. has enough problems without publicity seekers going out and openly mocking religion in order to provoke attacks and death. BE SMART.”

Klevius: Will this surprisingly fast pattern soon be followed by even more stubborn evil-islam deniers?

Original muslim conquests were only possible because they were assisted by willing "infidel" allies such as wealthy Jews and Christians.

The last ten years of Muhammad's life were spent mostly in Medina which served as his headquarters and base of the "Believers Community", i.e. the jihadi community, aka umma (which is today Saudi based and steered OIC). During these years, we are told in the Biography of Muhammad, the "prophet", raided and pillaged various places and fought against the "polytheists and pagans" ("infidels") of Mecca as well as against other Jewish tribes. It's important to understand that "Muhammad" (meaning 'the annointed' in Christian sources) was a Christian Jew, which fact explains much of the contradictory views on muslims and islam among Jews and Christians today.

In the beginning of the muslim "prophet's" stay in Medina, and after he had gathered enough young jihadis around him, he slaughtered everyone he considered a "Jew". We don't know his definition but we do know it must have been hard for him to have stolen a Jewish religion and then relabelled it while still having to deal with original Jews.

Muslims debate whether it is possible to interpret the Koran and other muslim documents as advocating religious "tolerance".
It is only possible if you develop a hermeneutical device that disconnects the interpretation of today from the historical context through which the text was proclaimed.

Ibrahim, a muslim "scholar": If you take the call for fighting the infidel to represent merely a historical incident that took place in the past in a specific situation within a specific context/time and affirm that that incident does not inform today's circumstances, then you can establish an interpretation that goes in harmony with what Obama suggested. Of course, this kind of interpretation would still be considered 'perverted' by some muslims who adopt and believe in literal interpretation of sacred texts."

Klevius: This muslim "scholar" doesn't have a clue about (or blink) what really made islam expand in the first place! The formula that was "successful" precisely because of its incredible evilness (even in its own time as witnessed in many sources, but today just dismissed as medieval Christian "islamophobia"): 


Klevius slightly updated writing from:

Sunday, June 22, 2014

Islam's evil history repeats itself exactly according to its evil original formula


Every true muslim is a Human Rights violator



ISIS is Ansar al Islam tuned to Saudi Wahhabism which, in turn, is tuned to the origin of islam - NOT TO ANY "WESTERN INTERVENTION"!


The only "Western intervention" is islam's incompatibility with Human Rights - the very same incompatibility that made OIC officially abandon Human Rights and replaced them with Sharia in UN. I.e. in the very world institution that was  created to defend Human Rights. In practice it means that the most basic of Human Rights are criminalized - just as in the world's most intolerant country, Saudi Arabia. It also means that every true muslim, due to whatever form of Sharia, is a Human Rights violator.

In Iraq Mullah  Krekar founded in 1999 Ansar al Islam organization with Abu Musab al Zarqawi, with whom he had contact since 1994. Through the cell of Abu Musab al Zarqawi in Amman Jordan. Their so called Jordanian millennium attack was scheduled to the 2000 new years eve. Ansar al Islam then developed to a copy of the original Caliphate including the Levant.


The Saudi dictator family plus its allies are the main contributors, both ideologically and financially, to the slaughtering, raping, torturing etc terror now going on. And of course they don't distribute the money with a tag marked the state of Saudi Arabia.

Günter Meyer, Director of the Center for Research into the Arabic World at the University of Mainz. Meyer, has no doubt about where ISIS gets its funding. 'The most important source of ISIS financing to date has been support coming out of the Gulf states, primarily Saudi Arabia but also Qatar, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates.'

However, just like original islam, ISIS utilizes financial possibilities in the wake of their slaughtering conquest. Sex slaves, pillaging and booty are the main incentives for jihadists. Piracy blessed by the Koran and Allah.

Charles Lister at the Brookings Doha Center: 'ISIS has made an effort to establish networks in society that generate a continuing flow of money. One example is the systematic extortion conducted by ISIS in the recently conquered city of Mosul. The exortion affects small businesses and big companies, construction firms, and if the rumors are true, even local government representatives. In addition, it's suspected that the organization levies taxes in the areas that it completely controls - for example Raqqa in northeastern Syria.'

According to Günter Meyer at the University of Mainz, there is no chance that money is flowing to ISIS from Sunni circles connected to the former dictator of Iraq, Saddam Hussein. The goals of ISIS are too different from those of people in Hussein's network. Both groups want to topple the Shiite government of Iraq, but ISIS wants to establish an islamic theocracy, whereas the Sunnis from Hussein's Baath Party want to establish a secular democracy.'


ISIS' looting of the central bank in Mosul, brought them some hakf a Billion $ in cash. Other banks in Mosul and other areas under ISIS control were also plundered.

Eliot Higgins, writing under the pseudonym Moses Brown: 'ISIS can now buy a lot of jihad. With $429 million, ISIS could pay 60,000 fighters $600 a month for a whole year.'


Klevius: After the Saudi dictator family, the Turkish Erdogan family and accomplices seem to be the most important supporters of the Islamic State's atrocities - especially when they are directed against Kurds.



Klevius question to BBC and its muslim Sharia presenter Mishal Husain: Do you see the pattern that exactly resembles how Klevius for more than a decade on the web has described the origin of islam?


Representatives of islam's three legs today: The physical reproducer; the cultural reproducer; and the militant destroyer




Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo all have sharia islam in common. But only two iof them openly admits it.


And always remember: 

'Before Abdul Malik, Mohammed is never mentioned on any official document
whatsoever, nor any form of religious pronouncement
'!


Muhammad (the anointed) was first a Christian-Jewish title that much later was made into islam's retrospective "prophet".

This is why the Saudis have put meters of concrete on non-existing tombs, early mosques etc. Islam is later modelling of a parasitic Arabic piracy formula "justified" via references to Judaic/Christian writings.


 This is what Klevius wrote after 9/11 on the web (not updated since):

 The root formula of Islam
Slavery+"infidel" racism+sex segregated rapetivism+anti human rights Sharia/apostasy ban. On behalf of today's and historical victims of Islam (in Darfur and globally), and on behalf of all humans who feel offended by the tenets/acts of Islam. Why isn't the worst crime ever against humanity criminalized, but instead protected by the very human rights it opposes?!* i.e. 1400 years of slavery/rapetivism/genocides
Without these evil racist/sexist/fascist extremist pillars and violent terror threats from so called "unislamic"* and confused morons Islam is dead!

AND ALL OF THEM ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL IN A DEMOCRACY BASED ON UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS! ISN'T THIS EXTREMISM IF ANYTHING?! FREEDOM OF RELIGION CAN'T MEAN PROMOTING DEATH OF FREEDOM!
.
Slavery (forbidden all over the world except in Koran/Islam) - It's well known that Islam allows slavery, although perhaps less well known that Islam emerged out of the very idea of sponging on institutionalized slavery. This is why Saudi islamofascist dictators, imams etc. terrorists and terrorist supporters don't admit that the Koran is completely wrong in a non-totalitarian world, not only because it allows slavery but especially in claiming to be some "god's" unchangeable word hence excluding even the possibility of reformation!
.
"Infidel" racism (forbidden according to the UN declaration on every humans equal value, but a basic tenet of Koran/Islam) - The moral cornerstone needed for taking slaves and abusing others. Today this alluring but evil racism is utilized in a variety of topics from the people of Darfur to the West in particular or general.
.
Rapetivism (globally forbidden because it's not in accordance with the principle that a person's sex shouldn't be used as a regulator of that person's freedom, but a basic tenet in Koran/Islam) - Rigid sex segregation for the purpose of abusing Islam confined girls/women as physical and cultural reproducers of Islam, i.e. as many new Muslims as possible.Sharia (forbidden in a democracy simply because it violates democracy and, like the other Islamic pillars, a bunch of human rights that democracy rests on) - Islam's jurisprudence for sex segregated rapetivism, apostasy ban etc. Ehsan Jami (Dutch ex-muslim): "We have an enormous problem with apostasy in Islam. We see a lot of problems where people want to leave Islam but they can't,"
.
Apostasy ban (forbidden because it limits a person's freedom of or from religion, but a basic tenet in Koran/Islam) - Children (commonly from birth) and adults (commonly via marriage/rape) are forced to become and stay Muslims.
.
These cannot be erased by mere "interpretations" but needs deep reformist castration! And in this sense "majority Muslims" are tightly connected to Islamic extremism, i.e. to Islam itself. And if that's just because of plain ignorance abt Islam they better educate themselves, e.g. in a Koran school true to the Koran and Islam! When coming out they then have two choices: Becoming an "extremist" (open or stealthy) or abandoning the message alltogether!

That Islam (Koran) allows and even encourages psychological and physical wife beating is just one of an abundance of "minor" ripples of the main pillars above. The naivity of Muslim feminism may be exemplified by Asghar Ali: "
...shari'ah also clearly lays down that if a man hides his impotency from his bride at the time of marriage and she discovers it after marriage, she is fully entitled to divorce on that ground. This itself clearly shows that she is entitled to sexual pleasure along with raising family." Rising what family?! The only reason for this rule is to safeguard that no woman fails to reproduce as many Muslims as possible!

The victims of Islam often reveal the same loyalty conflict as allegedly do victims of child abuse. However, some don't.
So why isn't the human rightsphobia we call Islam globally criminalized and indicted, and how come that many a "democracy" seem to care more abt islamofascist terrorists than supporting the war on islamofascist terror?! And why are we supposed to ask islamist imams, professors etc for advice?! It's like asking Goring how to deal with Hitler and his terrorist youth! The likely answer: "Don't question, criticize or mess with us but support us!

Tuesday, December 8, 2015

The shocking truth about CNN's view on muslims in America

 .

Muslim (Saudi & Co) sponsored media power vs. Americans 2007-2015. Can you spot any difference in how the candidates were/are portrayed!


CNN today really revealed the depth of the muslim problem - and Klevius asks why the simplest solution isn't picked up?


Holly Yan, CNN: A look at polls and studies conducted in the last few years show that Muslims have been crucial in helping law enforcement find terror suspects in the United States. Many have served in the military protecting the country against terrorists. And in many ways, they're a lot like other everyday Americans.

Klevius: !!! Why wouldn't "they" (i.e. some) be?!


Holly Yan, CNN: Here's the reality of Muslims in America -- and how it smashes stereotypes: They are a miniscule portion of the U.S. population



Klevius: Isn't CNN's stereotype much more worrying? How come that such a "miniscule (sic) portion of the population" causes proportionally so much mayhem, terror and suffering - not to mention CAIR's, OIC's and other muslim organizations "peaceful" but steadfastly gnawing on the most basic of Human Rights and the American Constitution.

Holly Yan, CNN: The fear of Muslims taking over and imposing Sharia law is unfounded. By some estimates, Muslims make up less than 1% of the U.S. adult population. Of all the Muslims in America, 63% are exactly the kind Trump wants banned -- immigrants.
 

Klevius: If 1% of the population can seriously threaten Human Rights and the US Constitution, then what could 2% do? With the help of Saudi based and steered OIC and other muslim sharia giants against basic Human Rights.






Saudi Arabia itself suppresses Shia muslims and non-muslims without anyone seeming to react.


An estimated 16 million natives of Saudi Arabia are Shia muslims. The Saud dictator family demand (but not necessarily for themselves) strict Sunni islamic Wahhabism which states that muslims should return to the interpretation of islam found in the Koran and the Sunnah. They also believe that muslims who seek intercession from holy men—such as the Imams Shia revere—are not true muslims. While attempts to force conversion of Shia have been infrequent, Shia have alleged severe discrimination in Saudi Arabia.

Saudi Arabia is also the home for all muslims' world organization OIC which is led by Iyad Madani, an islamofascist belonging to the Saud dictator family.

Calling oneself a true muslim automatically connects to sharia islam, the very opposite to Human Rights - e.g. as stated by all the world's muslims' Saudi based and UN sanctioned sharia organization OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation) and its islamofascist Saudi Fuhrer Iyad Madani.



A consequence of this is that a sharia supporting muslim's vote is undemocratic. OIC's 57 member state voting bloc in UN who supported Human Rights violating sharia as a guidance for muslim legislation all over the world was therefore also undemocratic.

Could there be any doubt that Mishal Husain isn't aware of OIC and its world sharia declaration? After all, it's even on Wikipedia.


Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo (who murdered Lee Rigby). Mishal Husain is BBC's top muslim presenter and BBC is the world's leading media. The only thing she needs to say is that she opposes Human Rights violating sharia - and thereby also opposes islam because islam without some form of Human Rights violating sharia is not islam anymore - it's just a private belief and won't bother Klevius a bit.

Holly Yan, CNN: They're better educated than most Americans. U.S. Muslims have the second-highest level of education among major religious groups in the country; Jews have the highest. And a greater proportion of them have college degrees than the general U.S. population.


Klevius: Mostly wealthy muslims reach America - so the comparison is truly idiotic - at best.

Holly Yan, CNN: They have more gender equality. While in many parts of the Muslim world, women are confined to second-class status, that's not the case among American Muslims. Virtually all of them (90%) agree that women should be able to work outside the home. American Muslim women hold more college or post-graduate degrees than Muslim men. And they are more likely to work in professional fields than women from most other U.S. religious groups.


Klevius: Really! They agree that women should be allowed to work outside home! When should American women follow suit? Ever heard about sharia and how muslim sharia in whatever color ALWAYS discriminates against women. However, most of those wealthy US "muslims" don't approve of such sharia. Yet by calling themselves muslims they contribute to the spread of exactly that sharia.

Holly Yan, CNN: They've been here since the birth of the nation ... Scholars estimate about a quarter to a third of the Africans brought to the United States as slaves were Muslims.



Klevius: Muslin "scholars" right? Or their accomplices. Truth is that almost ALL slave raiders/traders in Africa were muslims (read Africa's tragic history after the introduction of islamic slave raiding/trading in accordance with the Arabic Koran). Perhaps those were "wrong-muslims" or just poor people who didn't master to read Arabic Koranic texts to protect them from the "infidel" status that in islam gives muslim the "right" to see them as slaves.

Holly Yan, CNN: They're as religious as Christians ... The general perception of Muslims has one thing right: Most Muslims are very religious. About half say they attend the weekly Friday prayers. But that makes them similar to Christians: About 70% of Christians say religion is important in their lives, and about 45% go to a weekly service.



Klevius: No mentioning here about US biggest group, the Atheists (no dude, Klevius isn't talking about socialists but about non-religious people who anchor their moral on basic Human Rights).

Holly Yan, CNN: ... but they're not as dogmatic as they are portrayed. Much has been made about fundamentalist Muslims and their strict interpretation of the Quran. But most American Muslims are different. A Pew religious landscape survey found that 57% of American Muslims say there is more than one way to interpret Islam's teachings. A similar number says many different religions can lead to eternal life.


Klevius: "Eternal life"?! Can't believe I read this nonsense 2015. Holly Yan seems to share this medieval view of muslim jihadis in this respect. Read some Kierkegaard! It's only a couple of hundred years old. Klevius read it when he was 14. 

Holly Yan, CNN: There have been Muslims involved in terrorism ... Since September 11, 2001, until the end of 2014, 109 Muslim-Americans plotted against targets in the United States. And terrorism by Muslim-Americans killed 50 in the same time period. Contrast that with the deaths from other mass shootings just last year: 136 - more than twice as many as all the deaths from 13 years of Muslim-American terrorism.

Klevius: The minuscule 1% muslims, remember!

Holly Yan, CNN: ... but they've also spoken out against it. After every terrorist attack at home and abroad, the refrain rises, "Where is the Muslim condemnation?" American Muslims have spoken out -- and done much more. A Duke University study found more terrorism suspects and perpetrators were brought to the attention of law enforcement by members of the Muslim-American community than were discovered through U.S. government investigations. And a Pew survey found that roughly half of U.S. Muslims say their religious leaders aren't speaking out enough against Islamic extremism.

Klevius: Finally a good point in this thought morass! Muslim leaders aren't speaking out enough against islam. Why would they? After all, islam is by far the worst hate ideology our planet has ever encountered. And with a violent "prophet" at the core of the ideology, no wonder speaking about it clashes with the civilized world based on Human Rights equality.

Monday, December 7, 2015

"You ain't no muslim" actually means the London jihadi was seen as a muslim by an other muslim - and that the jihadi targeted what he thought were non-muslims


Muslim islamophobia


'Hate speech' (a legal invention to cover up islamic evil) often means a person (in most cases a non-muslim) who makes a statement considered discriminatory against a group (muslims).

However, 'muslims' obviously don't constitute a group - or do they?! And if they do, then isn't a derogatory remark from a muslim to an other muslim to be considered hate speech?

When a muslim says to a muslim terrorist who stabbed non-muslim Londoners while shouting "this is for Syria", that he isn't a muslim, this really proves this muslim saw the wannabe murderer as a muslim after all.

Klevius to the hashtag people: You're screwed! Making a "hero" of someone who don't follow the worst commands in the Koran is ill thought.

Klevius proposal:  Openly admit the bottomless fault line between real sharia muslims and anti-sharia "muslims"!

 Klevius wrote a year ago:

But I've got a muslim friend - don't generalize all muslims and all islam!

 Klevius answer:



 Ask your muslim friend if s/he supports OIC and its Sharia against Human Rights!


At this point you really also need to re-check your knowledge ignorance about islam: If you're not 100% convinced as yet that islam has been by far the worst slave raider/trader ideology in world history - then you need some really serious reading you won't find in yours or your children's school books.


Then ask her/him why s/he is against Human Rights for all! That will force your friend to either abandon islam or reveal that s/he is an islamofascist (i.e. against the most basic of Universal Human Rights - remember that when the Koran mentions 'humans' it only means muslims) under the surface!

Thursday, December 3, 2015

UK goes to war against original islam allied with its worst enemy, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (plus some Ottoman fanatic Turks), i.e. the custodian of "this evil ideology"

Sharia muslims are infiltrating all parts of society and as a consequence the dangers for non-sharia muslims increase. BBC could help pointing out this important dividing line between sharia muslims who reject basic Human Rights and non-sharia "muslims" who reject sharia and approve of Human Rights.

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo have sharia islam in common - unless of course, Mishal Husain is an apostate and too cowardice to admit it. Or is it too much to ask so called "moderate muslims" to show some courage? After all, it's extremely simple, especially for you Mishal Husain. Just use the so-called* BBC and honestly tell the Brits you are against Human Rights violating muslim sharia - or that you support OIC's (or worse) sharia!

* So called BBC is more Arab, Mideastern and muslim than British both in numbers and in finance. Still, the Brits are the only ones paying compulsory fees and taxes for its islam propaganda. A recent example is when BBC used the notorious CAIR to inform British listeners on the San Bernardino muslim terrorist attack. The muslim family of the mass murderers also turned to CAIR on the day of the slaughter. CAIR is an un-indicted co-conspirator in the largest terrorist-funding trial in US' history. Even UAE has designated CAIR a terrorist group. The CAIR press conference was a preemptive shot — to shut down discussion of the true motive behind the islamic attack in San Bernardino: jihad. Top CAIR representatives are pictured on Klevius Obama pic from 2009.



In 2004, Muzzammil Syed Hassan's wife Aasiya prompted him to develop "an American muslim media where muslim kids could grow up feeling really strong about their identity as American muslims. Hassan expressed belief that some moderate muslims could not identify with the extreme stereotypes often depicted in Hollywood productions and said that such muslims "think they are not accurately portrayed" and that "Bridges TV gives American muslims a voice and will depict them in everyday, real life situations. Every day on television we are barraged by stories of a 'a muslim extremist, militant, terrorist, or insurgent,'" Hassan said in the 2004 release. "But the stories that are missing are the countless stories of muslim tolerance, progress, diversity, service and excellence that Bridges TV hopes to tell." The Hassans received an award for this effort from the CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations). However, when Hassan's wife wanted to divorce him his muslim tolerance ended and he stabbed her nine times and beheaded her. It's also in this light Obama's hesitation to describe the San Bernardino attack for what it was should be understood.
.


BBC doesn't see "sympathy" for the Islamic State among British muslims as evidence enough of anti-British sentiments - yet the  same BBC shares the UK parliament's view that it's totally wrong to accuse anti-war MPs as "sympathizers of terrorism"!






 This islamofascist Saudi ally has now decided to behead Ashraf Fayadh, a Palestinian poet, for the "crime" of being an Atheist.

Klevius: Why are the so-called "anti-fascists" so silent about this?!


And here's an other muslim "ally":





 And here's Daddy himself:


 Erdogan: "It's a crime against humanity to question or criticize islam."

 Klevius: Well, perhaps not "humanity" but rather the Erdogan family and its accomplices who greatly benefit from islam - just as islam was meant to be in the first place - a tool for personal gain on the behalf of islam's victims.



.