TheresaMay's racist robbing of EU citizens' Human Rights

The Saudi Fuhrer of Saudi based islamofascist OIC

BBC's compulsory fee funded propaganda for Saudi sharia islam

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Sayeeda Warsi like all sharia muslims is against basic Human Rights

Theresa May is for sharia and EU - but against EU's Human Rights Court which condemns sharia

Klevius is probably now the world's foremost expert on sex segregation (sad isn't it), and islam (the worst cime ever) is the foremost expression of sex segregation. By 'islam' Klevius means the same as true sharia supporting (and therefore against the most basic of Human Rights) muslims.

British muslim jihadists: Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo (who murdered Le

Saturday, June 29, 2013

Humanrightsphobia


We need a European Spring against fascist islam - so not to repeat what happened some 70 years ago!




Nothing can be more fascist than islam! A totalitarian racist/sexist ideology that cannot accept basic Human Rights and which makes it extremely hard for muslims to leave the "faith" because of its apostasy ban and fascist organization (e.g. Saudi and Sharia based OIC which now more or less rules the UN that was created to stop it).

And our worst enemies are some of our own politicians and their connections with the worst scumbugs you can imagine.





Ha Ha "islamophobia"





Patrick Condell is an English writer, political commentator, comedian and atheist. internet personality. He performed alternative comedy shows during the 1980s and 1990s in the United Kingdom, and won a Time Out Comedy Award in 1991. He was also a regular panelist on BBC Radio 1′s “Loose Talk”. As of March 2013, Pat Condell’s YouTube channel has over 177,902 subscribers and 44 million video views.


Sayeeda Warsi is probably now the worst threat to the Brits' Human Rights



Douglas Murray: According to the Home Office if you are a non-Muslim and you make the following statement your presence will be deemed ‘not conducive to the public good’ and you will be barred from entering the United Kingdom:

    ‘It [Islam] is a religion and a belief system that mandates warfare against unbelievers for the purpose for establishing a societal model that is absolutely incompatible with Western society. Because of media and general government unwillingness to face the sources of Islamic terrorism these things remain largely unknown.’

If, on the other hand, you are a Muslim and you say the following then the UK government has no problem with you, and you can come in to the UK to do a speaking tour:

    ‘Devotion to Jihad for the sake of Allah, and the desire to shed blood, to smash skulls and to sever limbs for the sake of Allah and in defense of His religion, is, undoubtedly, an honor for the believer.’

In welcoming the decision to ban the first speaker, rather than the second, Keith Vaz, chairman of the Home Affairs Select Committee, has said:

    ‘The UK should never become a stage for inflammatory speakers who promote hate.’

Too late, Keith.  Too late.



Some comments on this:


Avatar
chan chan • 2 days ago

Cameron and his dhimmi government once again enforcing shari'ah law.
60

Reply

Share ›

Avatar
Julieann Carter • 2 days ago

Gosh! This is terrible! Why? Why? Why? There's no good reason! How utterly disturbing and sinister is this malicious and cowardly 'affirmative action'. Stand alone Muslims in government appear to be more powerful and influential than the rest of parliament combined. That what it seems like. Bloody creepy. You really have to question the motivation of Keith Vaz in wishing to bar those who would speak out
truthfully against violent Islam (as opposed to 'peaceful Islam')? I thought we were all supposed to be on the same side here?
57

Reply

Share ›

Avatar
Marky_D • 2 days ago

Wasn't that long ago I was hoping Theresa May would oust Cameron. Are there absolutely no free speech loving conservatives in the Conservative party any more?
Presumably Theresa May would ban those who came back from Nurembourg with scaremongering stories about that nice Mr Hitler and his National Socialist party...
55

Reply

Share ›

Avatar
retundario • 2 days ago

This is the most outrageous decision, and I will not vote for LibLabCon as a matter of principal because of it. Not only is it grossly unfair, it is also just stupidly dangerous, in the sense that many people are so disgusted and fed up with the UK political class's blatantly far (far, far, far) stronger repression of British people's right to express things from our ethnic point-of-view, as compared to the ultra-liberalism that applies to ethnic hatred against us and claims to Britishness from non-whites.
80 1

Reply

Share ›

Avatar
Old Fox • a day ago

The double standard to which you refer has been in place for many years. It arises from the "anti-racist" establishment's commitment to anti-white racism. Under the term's of this belief, all whites are collectively guilty for the alleged crimes of white Europe across recorded time. This of course is a form of collective guilt, one of the pillars of antisemitism. It also ignores inconvenient facts such as the Islamic slave trade, the involvement of black African chiefs in the Atlantic slave trade and the enslavement of more than a million white Europeans by the Ottoman Sultan. As a result of this belief only whites or those friendly to "white" values and society, such as Ayaan Hirsi Ali, are considered guilty of "hate-speech" or worse, because the rest of the world is merely giving vent to the just rage of the "oppressed". Why do you think the sexual exploitation of white girls by Pakistani perverts in northern England is greeted with such bland sang-froid? Why do you think our so-called "liberals" are so reluctant to highlight Islamic persecution of Christians and others across the middle east and so eager to prattle about "Islamophobia" in the west? Why do you think they have been so happy to flood Europe's heartlands with hostile newcomers - often from Islamic countries? Our ruling elite is in the grip of a morbid, self-hating attitude which heralds the persecution and perhaps the holocaust of European peoples. Unless we can overthrow these criminally treacherous scum we are heading for an unimaginable catastrophe.




The pic below illustrates at least two things: 1) How fascism hides behind gas, and 2) how islam and sex segregation (apartheid) are synonyms.

And sadly, Peter Klevius still seems to be the web's by far best informed (and intelligent enough) auctority on sex segregation. He feels quite alone though* so please come up with some competition. However, keep in mind that he has already long since eaten and burped both Judith Butler and Pierre Bourdieu. And he is a proud Atheist and therefore not vulnerable for "monotheistic" sexism.

* except, of course, that he is supported by the whole world in its inevitable march towards de-sex segregation. Compare his Demand for Resources (1981, and in book format 1992), Daughters of the Social State (1994), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Warning for Feminism (1998), and http://klevius.info/pathologicalsymbiosis.html (2004). Just to name a few.


Qatar is a main hub (together with Saudi Arabia and some other muslim states)  for the spreading of islamic hatred and Humanrightsphobia


How many have muslim fascists murdered, raped and tortured in Libya, Syria and elsewhere?

Having anything to do with them can only be excused with ignorance!

Sunday, June 16, 2013

How many murderous and sexist Allahs do muslims have?


Some 100,000 humans, mostly muslims, have now been killed in the islamic religious sectarian violence in Syria that is backed by the Saudi, Qatar, Turkey etc islamofascist leaders.



When muslims dislike other muslims they call them takfiri, i.e. an apostate who is not a true muslim, i.e. who believes in the wrong Allah.

And to make it impossible to decide whose Allah is the "right" one, islam has made Allah redundant in its praxis.

So the only function left to these Allahs is as a reference to why one commits what would be classified as atrocities etc. under Human Rights.


There are no "right" or "wrong" humans in Human Rights!


Because of islam's inherent incompatibility with Human Rights the Saudi based Sharia organization OIC with 57 member states introduced islamofascist Sharia via UN as an excuse for violating Human Rights.








Tuesday, June 11, 2013

Erdogan thinks introducing Sharia against the will of 88% is "democratic"!


Erdogan is not democratically elected because he deliberately lied by not openly telling the voters about his Sharia plans for Turkey! And although Klevius during the two last elections tried to inform the Turks via the web few were able to hear this crucial information due to the conventional media's noisy support of Erdogan and his party.


Two Turkish islamofascist fanatics





The origin of islam and its Sharia finance was parasitism centered on the enslavement of "infidels" and girls/women.


Erdogan now plans to build the world’s largest mosque in Istanbul, which is located in Europe. Moreover, he wants an islamic ruked Turkey to become the biggest member state in EU. And just like Hitler, Erdogan, though democratically elected (Hitler got first 33% and later more than 90% support from the Germans), he is for the introduction of Sharia which is undemocratic because it's islam and "islam covers all aspects of life".

Ihsanoglu, the leader of all muslims Saudi based Sharia organization OIC, in an interview said he wants to reinstate the Ottoman empire, which, btw, was nothing else than a Sharia financed slave market which fell in total misery and decay at the exact beat of the West's campaign against slavery.


Most Turks are islamophobes
According to an April 2013 Pew Institute survey, only 12 percent of Turks want Sharia (i.e. the very core of islam).




Shadowy Sharia finance
Businessmen who, together with pious muslim men and ignorant women, made up Erdogan's constituency, benefit from the AKP party’s spending via the public sector and government contracts etc.