Saudi steered Western evil against China good*.

* Without Sinophobia China would have been a normal country, albeit big. However, with the US initiated and backed Sinophobic smear campaign and demonizing, China has been forced to become the Jesus Christ among nations. So Peter Klevius asks you to figure out who is the Antichrist and who is his archangel (also see Atheist Peter Klevius article Angels of Antichrist for more on the concept). You can do it if you just open your eyes a tiny bit.

US should be ashamed of its government's extreme* and sinister Sinophobia campaign against China. US is becoming a global tyrant who wants to decide over smaller countries**.

* Do realize that whatever China would have done doesn't really matter for US because the only thing that matters is that China's tech success challenges US world hegemony  and the future of US freeloading on the dollar dictatorship which at every turn of events always benefits US financial elite while hurting the rest of the world. I.e. the very opposite to what China's spread of high tech and wealth means. 

** The people of these smaller countries aren't even aware of US dirty play via politicians and head of states. Take Finland for example, where the president goes behind the back of the people paving the way for NATO membership etc. Same thing happens wherever Pompeo makes a "visit". This militaristic cancer from US is dangerous and not good for the future.

And UK parliament should be ashamed of its racist Sinophobes.

The non-practicing "muslim" Sajid Javid who used his dog in his election campaign, now seems to turn more muslim again by joining US' Sinophobia campaign and accusing China for something he has no grounds for. There seems to be two Sajid Javids. Sajid Javid 1 with a dog used to oppose the use of "islamophobia" when Boris Johnson became PM, and Sajid Javid 2 who goes against China when no longer in Johnson's cabinet.


Human to human transmission  could not have been established with certainty because it was still unclear how the Wuhan health staff got it - especially as so many others didn't who also had been close to patients.

The most confusing fact about the 2019-nCoV coronavirus that can cause Covid-19 disease, was and still is that most people who have got it are free from symptoms

The most puzzling from scratch was the huge number of people without symptoms despite having been in close contact with sick people.

Also, many patients had no relation with the food market.

Moreover, the initial DNA test in December 2019 which wrongly indicated SARS contributed to understandable uncertainty until it was scientifically thoroughly controlled.

Trump’s trade adviser Peter Navarro: "China’s coordinated effort to hide the dangers of the Wuhan virus from the world." However, there's absolutely nothing except the accusations.


The fact that some medical staff were getting ill wasn't an unambiguous sign of human-to-human transmission, because they could also have got it from elsewhere.

Trump is creating the same fake media show against China as he himself was/is targeted by. But now his main enemy BBC is a close ally against China.

Is British rabies spread by British bats uncontrolled and muffled by the British government? What about the senseless slaughtering of badgers? And British hunting? And British halal slaughter? And spread of tropical etc. diseases?

China just happens to have one southern foot in a tropical zone that is connected to the world's evolutionary cradle. So for example, it's not China's fault that the seasonal flu always originate around there. Btw, Peter Klevius is working on a research project trying to clearify the role of bats in primate evolution. It seems that bats position between e.g. shrews and "true primates" may be the key to their prevalence as hosts for viruses such as corona-, hanta-, ebola- etc. human attacking viruses. Peter Klevius has personal experience of hantavirus in the 1990s but didn't need hospital care nor did he get any of the nasty follow-ups. Peter Klevius also got the tick-borne borrelia already in the 1980s but got away with it by getting antibiotics quickly because he knew about the danger. However, these two virus episodes made himaware of the intimate connections between mammals, ticks and these kind of human attacking viruses. Add to this the HIV/AIDS storm in the 1980s. Peter Klevius will keep you updated on this on his science blog. Sadly, the PC out-of-Africa religion has severly hampered research about human evolution and its pathogenes etc.

Aftonbladet's editorial by Pernilla Ericson is one of the worst example of fake media and Sinophobia racism - blindly obeying Trump's anti-China smear campaign.

Did she get this US made text via NATO and signed by Pompeo?! And a desperate preparation for utilizing this virus tragedy as a weapon against China in the future. However, Peter Klevius thinks this US led Western smear campaign for the purpose of protecting the world's worst freedoading bully may backfire - and hard. And Peter Klevius feels embarrassed by his Western look when he meets Chinese people. Btw, Peter Klevius uses Pernilla Ericson as an example - it could have been any US allied Western editorial steered by US/NATO and its islomafascist ally, the Saudi dictator family and Saudi based and steered muslim anti-Human Rights organization OIC. Also, not to forget that China was the first victim of this virus ambush. Yet China managed anyway to respond better and faster than most Western countries who were already aware of what had happened in China. And China's neighbors did better overall than the West.

Pernilla Ericson: China muffled.
Peter Klevius: Not a trace of any "muffling" simply because when you read the timeline in context, then there's simply not room for any "muffling".

Pernilla Ericson: China silenced Shi Zhengli.
Peter Klevius: Not at all. There had been a failed premature DNA test already in December, which wrongly indicated SARS, so it was quite natural to peer review and control that such failure didn't happen again. And the control (i.e. not "muffling") took only a few days.

Pernilla Ericson: Li Wenliang warned colleages but was taken by the police for spreading false rumours.
Peter Klevius: Wrong again. Li Wenliang, who was an eye doctor, not a virologist or expert on coronavirus, sent out the misleading DNA result prematurely on social media and later the same day apologized for his error. In which Western democracy would that have been tolerated? Sweden?!

Pernilla Ericson: Li Wenliang had to sign a document where he admitted his crime.
Peter Klevius: Indeed. The Chinese authorities thereby elegantly avoided prosecuting him.

Pernilla Ericson: Several weeks were allowed to pass and then China put a bone hard lockdown.
Peter Klevius: The timeline doesn't give room even for a single week!

Pernilla Ericson: China has done its best to change the picture of what happened.
Peter Klevius: No,China has done its best to correct your unfounded Sinophobia smear.

Pernilla Ericson: Consequences may follow. China's leadership is probably terrified about that day.
Peter Klevius: Again one can see the fingerprints from US. But the most likely scenario is that it's US/NATO and Pernilla Ericson whom history will lock to the pillory.

The whole of 2019 until the new coronavirus, had been a relentless Sinophobic anti-China campaign on every level. So Peter Klevius wonders why Chinese leaders would even think about anything else than being as open as possible?

The new coronavirus that can cause Covid-19 didn't come from bats but from some other animal. And although bats most likely had been one of the previous transmission steps, the fact is that we don't have a scientific understanding of how the bats get it either.

The reason the Chinese government wanted extra control of DNA results was the previous failed report (see below) which wrongly indicated SARS. However, British media (BBC etc.) blatantly lie about it and first accused Shi Zhengli's lab for spreading infected bats, while some weeks later making her a hero and accusing the government. And no, it didn't spread from bats - but possibly from civet cats. Suspected animals are now forbidden from the market.

UK/Matt Hancock (20200402): "We will work (against Covid19) with our friends and allies." Peter Klevius: That excludes the best, i.e. China, which you, on order from US, have declared an "unfriendly enemy"!

Peter Klevius fact check: "COVID-19 has a natural origin and there is no evidence that the virus was made in a laboratory or otherwise engineered" (Nature). China swiftly sequenced and shared the genome worldwide. China's remarkable response on all stages was praised by WHO (but not BBC) and is in line with its superior tech advances (Mao's China would never have made it). There isn't a trace of an alleged (by BBC etc. fakes) Chinese Covid19 reporting "delay" that wouldn't have been bigger in the West. And the reason is that
for China good reputation is all that matters - now when it has already won the tech competition. China's defense against West's smear campaign is called "propaganda" in the West. Dear US, it's time to behave! You lost the tech war to little Japan long ago. Now you've lost it against big China. Get over it. So Peter Klevius advises: Do as Wall Street, shake hands instead of producing unfounded Sinophobic smear propaganda!

Covid19 timeline

17 November 2019: A retrospectively confirmed case.
1 December 2019: The first known patient started experiencing symptoms but had not been to the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market. No epidemiological link could be found between this case and later cases.
8–18 December 2019: Seven cases later diagnosed as COVID19 were documented; only two of them were linked with the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market.
18-29 December 2019: Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) that will eventually be used for viral genome sequencing is collected from patients.
25 December 2019: Wuhan Fifth Hospital gastroenterology director Lu Xiaohong reported suspected infection by hospital staff.
26 December 2019: Zhang Jixian identified a CT scan that showed a different pattern from other viral pneumonia.
27 December 2019: She reported to Jianghan district CCDC with four cases. During the following two days, the hospital received three similar cases, who all came from Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market. The hospital reported to the provincial and city CDC directly which initiated a field investigation with a retrospective search for pneumonia patients potentially linked to the market. They found additional such patients and on 30 December, health authorities from Hubei Province reported this cluster to CCDC who immediately sent experts to Wuhan to support the investigation. Samples from these patients were obtained for laboratory analyses.
30 December 2019: Wuhan Municipal Health Committee informed WHO, Weibo etc. about an "urgent notice on the treatment of pneumonia of unknown cause". There had been "a successive series of patients with unexplained pneumonia recently." However, a DNA report inaccurately indicated SARS on one patient. Late same day (17:43) ophthalmologist Li Wenliang WeChatted "There were 7 confirmed cases of SARS at Huanan Seafood Market." He included a patient's CT scan. At 18:42, he admitted that it wasn't proven SARS.
31 December 2019: US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were alerted by China of an unexplained "cluster of 27 cases of pneumonia” in Wuhan.

Do realize that many (most?) early cases are only recognized in retrospect.

The Huanan Seafood Market was closed on 1 January 2020

US National Security Council office responsible for tracking pandemics received reports in early January predicting the spread of the virus to the United States.

On 2 January, 41 admitted hospital patients in Wuhan, China, were confirmed to have contracted (laboratory-confirmed) the 2019-nCoV (novel coronavirus); 27 (66%) patients had direct exposure to Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market.

US officials had been alerted to the initial reports of the virus by discussions between CDC director Robert Redfield and Chinese CDC Director Dr. Gao on Jan. 3.

7 January scientists of China's National Institute of Viral Disease Control and Prevention (IVDC) confirmed the novel coronavirus isolated on 3 January was the pathogenic cause of the viral pneumonia of unknown etiology (VPUE) cluster, and the disease has been designated novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia (NCIP).

According to prof. Mikhail Shchelkanov he got the DNA sequence of the novel coronavirus genome by the same day, i.e. 7 January.

US worst nightmare is a democratic China - which wouldn't change China that much but make it even more like one-party "democracies" in the West - because that would mean losing US only argument. 

US deliberately seeks Sinophobic confrontational aggression against China - which hampers the development and peace of the world.

US island puppets against China and EU. US, who used to treat Japan as it now treats China, is now parasitizing on former enemy Japan in an (in vane) effort to keep China high tech down, and on the much tinier UK ally to trouble EU.

Something sinister is behind when Sinophobic far right extremist politicians so desperately risk future development in UK with false accusations of "possible risks in the future", skewed presentations, and unfounded demonization of Chinese high tech. And while Klevius is posting this, all in his machine is spied on and sent to US. And why is BBC constantly only hosting Sinophobic guests who also happen to be supporters of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family and happy to allow US spying on you via US companies? The only risk Huawei poses is that the Chinese state gets fed up and makes it illegal to sell Chinese top tech to UK. China is the future of high tech, so stepping off the bus means retardation. Btw, the two main accusations against China could easily be made against US/UK as well. China wants to trade and therefore doesn't want to risk reputation. US doesn't bother about its reputation. And when it comes to clean up muslim "communities" from islamofascist extremists there's really no other difference than in numbers. Moreover, NATO/Turkey uses extremist Uyghurs against civilians in e.g. Idlib - and hypocritically accuse China when these jihadi return.

Klevius to women: NATO makes a deal with the Taliban to continue sharia oppression of women, and NATO+IS=true because NATO is the main culprit behind the suffering in Idlib. Without the support from NATO the worst muslim terrorist group would never have survived. Like IS, NATO ally Hayat Tahrir al-Sham wants to create an islamic state. Turkey/NATO backs SNA well knowing that it's together with HTS. I.e. a NATO member state invades its neighbor, sides with terrorists and gets full support from NATO when its soldiers get killed while helping the terrorists. And what about Yemen?!

UK's state media BBC is all against its PM - and China. And former Swedish PM's speech writer smears UK PM.

Former enemies BBC and Trump are now both united on the same line against China. But is it any good for the "Brits" and the "Americans"?

On top of BBC's agenda is Sinophobic China smear. Every day, and repeatedly so that BBC's compulsory fee paying listeners should really get it.

But isn't it strange that whereas Trump is against muslim migrants, BBC is the very opposite.

Peter Klevius thinks BBC's and Trump's Sinophobic agenda will hurt consumers because the best tech inevitably comes from China - and even more so in the future. It's like abandoning Japanese cars for Russian ones.

 Here are some of BBC's Saudi loving Sinophobes - are they the dumbest or most corrupted (or both) UK politicians? They certainly pose a bigger threat to UK people than Huawei does:

As Peter Klevius noted in his previous post, Swedish state socialism has a 100% grip on every political party as well as the state bureaucracy (the social state) and is now beyond rescue - unless it gets less Sinophobic and more "islamophobic". And unlike China, the Swedish political corruption is slowly diluting its tech and research power. If you master Swedish (i.e. original English) - which you should - listen to Markus Allard, a Marxist who has a problem with the political aristocracy and left the Swedish communist party.

Moa Berglöf, a former speechwriter for former Swedish Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt (conservatives), a noted proponent of mass migration, accuses UK PM Boris Johnson for a possible PR bluff for the purpose of hiding political irregularities.

 Moa Berglöf left the conservatives for the Centre Party which is even more positive to muslim immigration.

  She says: "Rather high play by Boris Johnson to get coronavirus and end up on an intensive care unit etc, just so he Here's the original: "Högt spel ändå av Boris Johnson att få coronaviruset och hamna på iva etc, bara så han kan lägga ut fina filmer som får en att glömma all annan skit han hållit på med."

The pic to the right has been on Peter Klevius blogs and sites since 2007. And since 2003 Peter Klevius has warned about islam inspired hate crimes and sexual abuse (many leading to suicide etc. by the victims) in Swedish schools, streets etc. where teachers and authorities just look the other way.

Translation: "White whores": Large mob brutally beat celebrity women. Were suddenly attacked by10-15 Africans. "They have got their faces destroyed."

BBC sees no problem with islamic sex slavery. However, Peter Klevius has some issues with it. E.g. that the ongoing history falsification in favor of islam has made most people completely unaware of islam not only being the biggest slave master ideology since its origin - but also that the very basis of islam's origin is the supremacist racist idea that by naming others "infidels" you can do whatever to them.

Peter Klevius was stunned when he realized the deep ignorance still about Swahili. 15 years ago he asked Abba's Björn Ulvaeus to help publishing the book Roots Origin which was based on Peter Klevius research about the early islamic slave trade system along the coast of East Africa which created the Swahili language between muslim slave traders and local big men who sold slaves delivered via rivers out to the islands where the muslim Arabs had their basis and slave trade mosques. Moreover, this system was connected in a rough "wind triangle" connecting the islamic slave trade all the way to Aceh in what is now Indonesia. This owBjörn Ulvaeus withdraw from the project, possibly because of the threat from muslims in Sweden, who knows. The manuscript is still way ahead of anything else in this topic - incl. a collection and investigation of the functional structure of the earliest mosque environment.

Atheist Peter Klevius spring greeting: Is China our last hope for Human Rights against religious orthodoxy?

Jewish despise for Jesus Christ* - and Sweden's road from Chinese Atheism to US backed Saudi (OIC) islamism.

* Educate yourself by reading the most important article in sociology from the last century, namely Angels of Antichrist by Peter Klevius (1996). Btw, according to Transparency International, Sweden is the most corrupt of the Nordic countries. As such, Seden would have benefited from the same anti-corruption campaign Xi initiated in China.

Judaism's view on Jesus from Wikipedia, the politically correct encyclopedia:

In Judaism, Jesus is viewed as having been the most influential and, consequently, the most damaging of all false prophets.[1] However, since the traditional Jewish belief is that the messiah has not yet come and the Messianic Age is not yet present, the total rejection of Jesus as either messiah or deity has never been a central issue for Judaism.

Peter Klevius: What?! "Never been a central issue for Judaism". Right, like "god" never been a central issue for Atheism.

Wikipedia: Judaism has never accepted any of the claimed fulfilments of prophecy that Christianity attributes to Jesus. Judaism also forbids the worship of a person as a form of idolatry, since the central belief of Judaism is the absolute unity and singularity of God.[2][3] Jewish eschatology holds that the coming of the Messiah will be associated with a specific series of events that have not yet occurred, including the return of Jews to their homeland and the rebuilding of The Temple, a Messianic Age of peace[4] and understanding during which "the knowledge of God" fills the earth."[5] Since Jews believe that none of these events occurred during the lifetime of Jesus (nor have they occurred afterwards), he was not the Messiah (i.e. Christ, the anointed one).

Wikipedia then continues with a row of dissident Jewish "scholars" who try to squeeze in Jesus in a less damaging way. But these "scholars" have never been accepted anyway in mainstream Jewish orthodoxy!

Precisely because of its size, China's "democracy problem" is in fact smaller than that of e.g. Sweden*.

* The Chinese government is called socialist/communist but has nothing in common with Mao's China - or with any other failed communist countries for that matter. China can't fail simply because if it turns democratic almost nothing will change and it will continue to be a copy of Western "democracies" except for the fact that it's technologically much more advanced.

China in relation to US is approximately as US in relation to France, Italy or UK.

Do note that socialist Sweden (read Peter Klevius Angels of Antichrist) and China today are almost identical - except for in size and view on extremist sharia muslims. Both countries rest on technology, although China is already far ahead - and 140 times smaller.

Unlike China, Sweden has abandoned Atheism for islamism.

The disgusting history of Western and, to a much lesser and briefer extent, Japanese interventions in China, combined with political use of Sinophobia racism, made it important for China to have a stable government. However, the Chinese constitution (which is extremely weak in Sweden - and completely lacking in UK) keeps Xi in a tight grip.

The speaker of the Swedish parliament proposes the PM but in practice it's usually the socialists who decide it. And the few times Sweden has had a non-socialist majority, the heavy bureaucratic heritage from a century of socialist governments and civil servants - i.e. the social(ist) state - has made it impossible to change almost anything - other than in an even more social(ist) state direction (again, read Angels of Antichrist).

The Swedish PM may pick whomever from the street as ministers in the government. As a consequence, the Swedish government is more distant from the eletorate than in most s.c. democracies. Add to this the Swedish constitution that is all about keeping the Swedes at bay. This also explains why the "democratic" state dictatorship in Sweden is so politive to muslim immigrants who usually vote for socialists/communists, greens and the centrists - well knowing that only a few of them will have any democratic say over the governing of Sweden except for tose few whom the system will swallow into itself. However, what is missing here is the threat from islamism.

The Basic Laws of Sweden (Swedish: Sveriges grundlagar) 

includes the following exemptions from the right to access to public documents are defined in the Public Access to Information and Secrecy Act (Offentlighets- och sekretesslagen)[5] which succeeded the Secrecy Act (Sekretesslagen)[6] in 2009. The act details which information government agencies can keep secret, under what circumstances, and towards whom. According to the Chapter 2, Article 2 of the Freedom of the Press Act: "The right of access to official documents may be restricted only if restriction is necessary having regard to

    the security of the Realm or its relations with a foreign state or an international organization;
    the central finance policy, monetary policy, or foreign exchange policy of the Realm;
    the inspection, control or other supervisory activities of a public authority;
    the interest of preventing or prosecuting crime;
    the public economic interest;
    the protection of the personal integrity or economic conditions of private subjects;
    the preservation of animal or plant species."

This list is exhaustive and the Parliament may not legislate about restrictions outside the scope of this list, and any restrictions have to be legislated into the Public Access to Information and Secrecy Act previously mentioned.

Secrecy is limited to a maximum time of 70 years (when relating to individuals that is 70 years after the person's death).

Limited free speech in Sweden

    Sweden protects free speech in its Constitution. However, freedom of the press and freedom of expression may be limited by law. For example, Sweden criminalizes a number of behaviors aimed at groups and individuals, including hate speech (racial agitation), enticement, and defamation.

    Disruption of certain public gatherings, such as public deliberations in the Swedish Parliament and religious ceremonies, is also criminalized. In addition, disorderly conduct aimed at aggravating others is criminalized.

    Public speech (such as at town halls and demonstrations) may be limited by law. Demonstrations require a prior permit. Police may break up public speeches or other groupings of people if there is a risk to human life or of a disruption to traffic or the immediate surroundings. 

    All Swedish broadcasters must apply for a permit to broadcast in Sweden. Broadcaster licenses may be revoked and broadcasters may be fined for violating regulations applicable to them. While foreign media may operate in Sweden, Sweden does not oversee foreign broadcasters that broadcast from abroad to a Swedish audience. For instance, several channels are offered to Swedish viewers from the United Kingdom.

    Foreign journalists may receive accreditation from individual institutions and events and may have the same accreditations revoked for misuse.

I. Scope of Protection of Freedom of Speech and the Right to Interrupt Public Speech
A. Constitutional Protection of Free Speech

Sweden protects freedom of speech in its Constitution (Instrument of Government).[1] Freedom of speech is further protected and regulated in two separate constitutional acts—the Freedom of the Press Act and the Fundamental Law on Freedom of Expression.[2] In addition, freedom of speech is protected in the European Convention on Human Rights.[3] Sweden introduced its first freedom of the press legislation in 1766.[4] The document was adopted by Royal acclamation, and removed the need for publishers to attain preapproval from the King prior to publication.[5] A special Fundamental Law on Freedom of Expression covering non-print media was adopted in 1991.[6]

While Swedish law generally protects freedom of expression, there are limits that may be imposed.  For example, the Freedom of the Press Act allows the legislature to regulate press freedom, such as by adopting laws that limit the use of advertisements and criminalize child pornography.[7]
B. Civil Ordinance Rules and Use of Freedom of Speech at Public Gatherings

Peace and order in public places is regulated in the Swedish Civil Ordinance Act.[8] The Civil Ordinance Act applies to public gatherings and seeks to guarantee the safety and security of those present.[9] Public gatherings may not be held in Sweden without a prior permit.[10]  In addition, certain gatherings may be prohibited, either based the gathering’s geographical location or content.[11] Public gatherings may be dissolved if they are disruptive.[12] Previous disruptions at similar events may also be a reason to deny the issuance of a permit for a public event.[13]
1. Application and Permit Requirement

Public gatherings may not be held in Sweden without a prior permit.[14] Applications must be made to the Swedish police.[15] The Police may request that the applicant provide additional information with regard to the event before issuing a permit.[16]
2. Police Rights to Break Up Public Speech Events

The police may dissolve gatherings held without a permit[17] or that are disruptive.[18] The fact that a specific gathering was previously disruptive may be a reason to refuse a permit for a public event.[19] In addition, a public gathering to perform an artistic production or a public event may be dissolved “if the gathering [in itself, or by] the use of sound or in any other way entails considerable disruption of the public order in its immediate surroundings. This does not, however, apply when the gathering is conducted in accordance with an issued permit.”[20] Public gatherings may only be dissolved if a less invasive measure is found ineffective.[21]
C. Criminalized Speech
1. Disruption of Public Deliberation or Public Gatherings

Noise disruption (such as heckling) at a “religious service, marital ceremony, funeral, court proceeding, or other state or municipal meeting, or public deliberation” is a separate crime in Sweden.[22] An example of a disruption of a public deliberation includes hecklers at the Swedish Parliament. Such disruptions are punishable with a fine (böter) or up to six months of imprisonment.[23]
2. Disorderly Conduct

In addition, disorderly conduct (förargelseväckande beteende) intended to aggravate (förarga) people is also criminalized, and punishable with monetary fines.[24] The disorderly conduct provision explicitly includes noise disruptions.[25] To be punishable the person must “make noise in a public place or behave in public in a way that is intended to arouse public anger.”[26]

Disorderly conduct may include expressive conduct like waving a flag with offensive symbols.[27] The crime has a long history and was included in the Criminal Code as early as 1734.[28] As recently as the early 1900s it was also used to sentence persons who voiced opinions that were controversial.[29] This changed when an explicit prohibition on punishing opinions in the 1940s was included in the legislative history to the amendment of the Penal Code, where the legislators explained that it was the behavior not the content of what was said that should be punished.[30] Examples of behavior that has led to convictions include a person who sang and played music in his private home with the windows open in order to disrupt a political meeting that was being held outside his property.[31] Thus, heckling a political group is likely to fall within the constraints of disorderly conduct even if it does not specifically meet the requirements to be deemed disruption of public deliberations and gatherings mentioned above.
3. Racial Agitation

Sweden has criminalized “hate speech” when it amounts to “racial agitation” (hets mot folkgrupp), defined as ”a statement or other message that is spread and disseminated that threatens, or expresses condescension against, an ethnic group or another group of persons based on race, skin color, national or ethnic origin, faith, sexual orientation, gender, or gender identity or expression.”[32] The provision only protects the enumerated groups of people, and publication of untrue statements in itself is not considered hate speech. It was first introduced in a government bill in 1944 as a response to racial agitation against Jews.[33]
4. Enticement

Sweden criminalizes enticement (Uppvigling), defined as “orally in front of a public gathering, [or by other means in writing], [trying] to entice others to commit a criminal act, betray a citizenship duty, or disobey a government agency.”[34]
5. Offenses against Individuals

In addition to the specific crimes mentioned above, which target behavior against groups of people, crimes directed at individuals, such as threats (hot),[35] defamation (förtal),[36] and insults (förolämpning)[37] are also criminalized.

The truthfulness or accuracy of an insulting or defamatory statement is generally not a legitimate defense against prosecution for such crimes under Swedish law.[38] Thus, if a truthful statement (e.g., person A has been convicted of rape) is spread with the intent of causing that person harm, or harming his or her standing in society, it is still defamation.[39] However, statements made by the press without the intent to cause another person harm may be excused because they are true if the publication (for instance, of the person’s name) was necessary.[40] These crimes are punishable with a fine or imprisonment of up to six months for insults, and two years for defamatory statements.[41] These crimes can also be committed against a deceased person, provided that it is hurtful to his or her family, or because of the short period of the time that has elapsed since the person’s death.[42]

Peter Klevius fact check of BBC's fake news and lies

BBC Radio 4 repeatedly lies about NHS Nightingale hospital being built in 9 days.

Peter Klevius fact check: It wasn't built at all - it was the already existing ExCel exhibition centre that was filled with hospital beds. And it took 9 days - not a week.

However, the Chinese Wuhan hospital was built from scratch in less than two weeks.

.